LegendDC9 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1887 times:
There are two categories right now. The new PS service that UA has started between JFK to LAX and SFO it is a cut above their basic domestic first class. I flew on the LAX JFK earlier this month and it was pretty comperable to intl. business, very nice. other domestic F/C's are pretty standard across the board.
RoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9637 posts, RR: 52
Reply 3, posted (9 years 9 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1768 times:
It is a competitive product with the rest of the airlines in the country. Seat pitch is on par with others in the 36-38 range, and the seats are generally comfortable. It changes widely depepnding on which plane you are on as far as IFE and service go. The entire domestic fleet has the same seats with the exception of the 767s which have narrower seats due to cabin width. I always have had good experiences on it, but would never actually pay for it. The product is not worth the astronomical prices that they charge for it. Most passengers are upgrades, and that is how I usually fly as well.
The meal service is good for flights over 2 hours. They give an option of hot meals for lunch and dinner. Lunch is usually a salad or warm sandwich option, while dinner is a choice between chicken and another warmed entree. Usually they are pretty good for what you will expect in the sky. The flight attendants try their best to give a good service, and the meals are usually served well, but not in multiple courses with menus like in the past.