Monorail From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 628 posts, RR: 4 Posted (10 years 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 7689 times:
The title pretty much covers the question. What changes would you make if you had the authority? To the airport itself, but let's not include new airline routes
Change parking structures?
Aesthetics inside the terminal?
Or anything else?
AZjetgeek From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 235 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (10 years 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 7656 times:
My home airport is PHX. I've flown into and out of this airport since I was just a little boy (I was probably 3 or 4, but the earliest I can recall was when I was 5). I had the "pleasure" of actually flying out of old Terminal 1, which has since met the wrecking ball. I also recall when Terminal 2 opened. It was such a marked improvement over No. 1.
Unfortunately, it appears that the Sky Harbor people and City of Phoenix have become so enamored with Terminal 4, which houses HP, WN, BA and WestJet, among others, that they only seem to make improvements there while ignoring Terminals 2 and 3. Terminal 4 is fantastic and one of the best I've ever flown out of or into. Unfortunately, there are marked differences at 2 and 3, especially Term 2.
I believe the following improvements should be made at Terminal 2 so that it could absorb some of the traffic from Term 3:
1. Enlarge gate lounges. Very crowded and uncomfortable.
2. Add more restaurants and other amenities.
3. Add more gates. Between 8 and 12 more would be a good start.
By expanding Term 2, Sky Harbor might be able to shift some of the airlines with minimal service in and out of PHX. These include Midwest, Frontier, and ATA. Even JetBlue could be accommodated from Term 2 if such improvements were made, unless B6 has plans for major expansion.
Another improvement I'd like to see is adding more international carriers. At present, BA is the only major one flying into and out of PHX. Lufthansa cut out PHX several months ago. I'd like to see Qantas, Virgin, and Aer Lingus join the gang at Sky Harbor.
Mkeflyer717 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 431 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (10 years 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 7653 times:
MKE has recently built a new parking structure, started renovating concourse C, and is in the process of widening a few taxiways, but to improve MKE even more I would extend runway 1R/19L to handle at least rj's or even some 717s so we would have 2 parallel runways. Also I would want to build a new concourse southwest of concourse E (maybe 8-10 gates) and renovate the international gate area to handle the increasing amount of charters from Mexico and the Caribbean. Lastly I would make another viewing area to make watching planes much easier at MKE.
PlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11787 posts, RR: 60
Reply 6, posted (10 years 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 7643 times:
Wow, great timing for this topic, have just finished redesigning my local airport (PLH) as part of a University portfolio. Below is how the airfield currently looks, it is owned by Sutton Harbour Holdings, who also own Air Southwest;
Closure of runway 06/24
Extend runway 13/31 to the East from 1161m to 1500m
Construct a new terminal and aprons parallel with runway 13/31 capable of handling four RJ100 sized aircraft
Multistory car park linked to the terminal by covered walkway
New approach road underneath runway extension linking to B3432
Duelling of the B3432 between the A38 Devon Expressway and the A386
Demolish current hanger and construct larger structure on same site to accomodate 3 RJ100 sized aircraft along with full maintainance facilities
Create cargo ramp on the former threshold of runway 06
Relocate flying school and executive aviation services to the West of the airfield, next to the A386
Currently Plymouth airport is served by Air Southwest and Air Wales, flying to;
This uses a mix of ATR42s and DH8-311s, other visitors to the airport are D228s, D328s, F50s and the occasional BAe146 on diplomatic buisness. Loads on all flights are restricted due to the short runway, the extension would allow aircraft such as the ATR72, 146/RJ series, EMB135/145, DHC8-400 or other aircraft of similar size to depart with a decent or full load. My intention is to attract BA back to the airport and other carriers such as Aer Arran, FlyBe, Aurigny Air Services, Iberia and Britt Air (choice to the very popular ferry service to Bilbao/Roscoff) amongst others.
Currently the A386 road to the west of the airfield is being rerouted to allow for a 90m safety area, required to be in place by 1st January 2005, works are currently running about a month behind scheduld and can be seen in the shot below.
In reality though, something is going to have to be done soon about either relocating the airport or enlarging the existing one, one multinational company has already pulled out of Plymouth stating the appauling transport links as a contributing factor, and two other companies have backtracked from relocating here due to the same reason. One French company employing about 300 people is now almost certain to leave after Air Southwest failed to announce Paris as one of their new destinations.
Well, I can but dream I suppose
...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
SE210Caravelle From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 258 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (10 years 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 7625 times:
I live near Ohare International and it it's self is a pretty good airport. Especially the United terminal which is designed very nicely by the somewhat famous architect Helmut Jahn. It includes a modern design with cool light works etc, etc. I am sure most of you have been there! It's just to bad that United can't be as nice as their home terminal!
Anyway if I could improve the airport in whole (not just the United terminal) I would actually do very little. Of course this is all assuming of an unlimited budget:
Have a large observation deck with a panorama view located above the main terminal that would allow passengers to view planes departing, landing and taxing. It would be enclosed by large plane glass windows and use the same blue metal infustructure that the United Airlines terminal uses. It would be sound proof, air conditioned or heated, decorated nicely with lounges. In the center would be a decent resturaunt. It would be easily accesible from all parts of the airport and would also allow people viewing the planes to log onto the ATC radio communication! Of course for the convience of people using the airport you would be able to hear when your flight would be boarding by announcements made over the PA system!
A state of the art exhibit in the airport that would highlight the great moments of flying and monumental times in flying. It would include photos, computers, movies interactive features, a chance to learn how a plane flys, a interactive flight simulator (where you choose the plane you want to fly) and an actual plane inside the building. It would be located near the airport and would be accessed either by it's -- the exhibits -- main entrance or an underground walkway that would lead from ORD to the exhibit. This walkway would be designed as a runway with runways lights and signs and would be dark. The exhibit would idealy be free!
Finally there would be more gate seating! Instead of the ugly blue, leather chairs there would be white lounge chairs which reclined slighty. In the seats there would be a power-port for a laptop! There would be more TV's which showed differant channels (not just the usual CNN channel they play) and lastly there would be an area for children.
Ltbewr From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13250 posts, RR: 16
Reply 8, posted (10 years 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 7618 times:
My 'home' airport, and who's code is part of my screen name here - EWR - has plans for major renovations for Terminal B in the next 5 years. There has been extensive changes done to Terminal C over the years too. Terminal A will be due for renovations/revisions in about a decade. EWR has it's monorail/light rail system connecting all the terminals, some parking, rental cars lots and to mainline rail lines to NYC and Phildelphia.
Of course, EWR could use a second main runway parallel to the ones there today, and sufficiently spaced to allow closer and tigher in/out of flights, especially when the weather is bad. This is pretty much a no go as the area around the airport is already been heavily developed, with the NJ Turnpike taking up the most sutiable area many years ago. I would also put in more and cheaper parking, especially short and long term with more fequent and expanded bus services. There has been extensive expansions of parking, with new garages in the last several years, but it isn't enough. I would love a free or low fee 'spotters zone' within the airport property, and not be subject to the whims of local cops.
Andz From South Africa, joined Feb 2004, 8485 posts, RR: 10
Reply 10, posted (10 years 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 7605 times:
JNB has undergone some radical changes in the last few years, including a new domestic terminal and many internal improvements to the international terminal. I think they could do with an SAA terminal, there is plenty of space between the parallel main runways to build one, this would free space at the existing terminals and eliminate the need to park international flights at D apron and bus passengers to the terminal. Jetways at B apron and an underground moving walkway to the main terminal would also be a great improvement.
After Monday and Tuesday even the calendar says WTF...
Salso From Slovenia, joined Dec 2004, 205 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (10 years 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 7561 times:
My home airport (actually the only international airport in Slovenia with scheduled service) is LJU - Ljubljana Brnik airport. It's a small airport with approximately half a million passengers annually.
1.) I would remodel the whole terminal. The old one is outdated and small, even though large enough for such an amount of traffic. But I would like more shops inside the departure lounge (at the moment there's only one) and more bars airside (also only one currently). I also woulsn't mind one or two jetbridges instead os airstairs. The check-in area though is large enough, bright enough and nicely furnished.
2.) Parking until recently wasn't very nice (only uncovered parking spaces, which could also be pretty far away from the terminal. And you have to walk there). But now they are building a new three-story garage which will be opened soon. So no changes needed here.
3.) In terms of destinations and schedules, there in my opinion nothing needs to be changed. The airport has enough services to places all over Europe and it is not hard to find a flight to actually anywhere in the world.
JetBlue190 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 122 posts, RR: 16
Reply 16, posted (10 years 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 7550 times:
-lengthen both runways from 8600 to 12000 ft.
-get rid of terminal B and create something new
-add a state-of-the-art international terminal to acommodate widebodies
-modern shopping centers in all terminals
-more check-in counters in terminals A and B
ANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (10 years 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 7547 times:
ANC: Two terminals, north and south. South has an awesome new "C" Concourse, opened this last fall. Its A Concourse is in need of renovation, there isn't any service past Security. There used to be a small shop and a small bar/lounge but not any longer. B Concourse is scheduled for renovation, although I think it's in great shape now. Plenty of things to do beyond security (airside).
The North Terminal used to house strictly international flights, but now pays host to DL, HP and F9 also.
The two are not connected. One must take a bus to go from one to the other. It's quite inconvenient, since it's a straight line and less than one quarter of a mile from terminal to terminal.
There needs to be an enclosed (this is Alaska, of course it must be enclosed) connector, with movnig walkways built between the two . . .
Stlual747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 167 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (10 years 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 7536 times:
Well in STL lets start with demolishing the main terminal. I would rebuild it to look something like DEN. I think our gate area is like a dark hallway. It is very narrow if you compare it to some place like DEN. I would also put in moving walkways and new Departure/Arrival screens. Ours are getting quite old. I think there needs to be more of a selection of restaurants to eat at as well.
Oh and I would also do everything in my power to attract more flights.
Jfrworld From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 365 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (10 years 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 7511 times:
Although I don't live in PHX anymore, I did spend my first 23 years in PHX and I still consider it my home airport.
I think a few others have touched on the following:
1. Demolish T2. Its such an embarrassment because its so old and outdated.
2. Expand and Remodel T3. Add a second concourse to both the South and North side. Move all the T2 airlines to T3.
3. Demolish the old Honeywell Industrial Complex that runs along the North side of the aiport. Flying into PHX is beautiful especially when landing from the East and you descend over Scottsdale, the Papago Buttes and Camelback Mountain, then as soon as you touch down you see this massive ugly greenish series of buildings along with the runway that proudly say Honeywell. The whole thing looks like it was constructed out of corregated metal.
4. I agree with Airbus3801 - 86 the carpet. The Hopi print is a bit outdated.
Flymia From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 7298 posts, RR: 6
Reply 22, posted (10 years 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 7508 times:
MIA it being changed but I hope they make the Check Area's much better. I was just in EZE and wow there Checkin area is awesome! Whish MIA could be like that but no room. The Bag claim area could be alot better too. And where you get the buses and taxis. But the airport is going to imporve as the D gates are very nice already. And J councourse is going to be great. Along with the new D Terminal.
"It was just four of us on the flight deck, trying to do our job" (Captain Al Haynes)
Andz From South Africa, joined Feb 2004, 8485 posts, RR: 10
Reply 24, posted (10 years 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 7470 times:
Frank and CB I'm right with you there, thank God this was never allowed in South Africa, it's bad enough trying to fight your way through the rubberneckers into the check-in area, I can't imagine how awful it must be having them all the way to the gate!
After Monday and Tuesday even the calendar says WTF...
: Also for EWR, the biggest thing I would change is the cop situation. They always seem like they are out to get you, and they have no respect for aviat
: BOH- A new terminal would be nice. One has been planned but I don't know if I'm going to see it in my lifetime! New arrivals hall on the existing term
: For a start, I would put in a viewing gallery. NCL used to have one, on the rooftop, so you had the best possible view, apart from the control tower,