Crox1 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 308 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2952 times:
I have the opposite problem to my fellow country person Amy, I have a fat arse and short legs, but it would not matter which option I took as my partner goes on every flight I do, and has this annoying habit of falling asleep before take-off and occupying her seat and a significant part of mine.
The things we do in the name of love, still won't give up the window seat tho'
If it came to a straight fight between a flight on a 777 or a MD11, it would have to be the 777, MD11's are rather cramped; like their forerunners the Dc10, 777's seem roomier and have their own PTV's etc.
Both optimists and pessimists contribute to the society. The optimist invents the aeroplane, the pessimist the parachute
727EMflyer From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 547 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 2919 times:
I recently flew in a 10 abreast DC-10. It was a cheap flight/vacation package, HNL-LAS-HNL, but after the flight HNL-LAS I knew I would shell out and upgrade to mainline coach next time! My legs are longer than my tush is wide, but I was uncomfortable just sitting. When it came time for the meal it was all I could do to keep from bumping into my neighbors every couple seconds. Even with long legs, I can always stow my carry ons above and stow my feet underneaththe seat in front of me (and I'm sensible enough to get an aisle, nice as a window seat is).
Aside from the seat comfort, the extra seat means the aisles are teeny tiny! With a normal width aisle you can creatively squeeze by the service carts. No way imaginable are you going to do that in one of those sardine cans.