USAF757300 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (10 years 5 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 6099 times:
In Feb. I will be traveling to London from Phoenix, and I would like to fly into LHR, so that leaves me with NW/KL via MSP & AMS, AA via ORD, BA N/S, or UA via ORD. I have never flown long-haul with any of those carriers, so please share your experiences and recommendations.
Fbgdavidson From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 3774 posts, RR: 26
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 6095 times:
What class of travel are you looking at? If it is down the back you might want to break it up with a stop at ORD/MSP (as per your suggestion) although to be honest I'd say flying BA has to be a winner in my eyes in that it is non-stop!
"My first job was selling doors, door to door, that's a tough job innit" - Bill Bailey
ACDC8 From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 7776 posts, RR: 33
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 6086 times:
I'd go NW/KL because it gives you 3 sectors, 3 take-offs and landings, 3 different a/c types, 4 airports. KLM is a great carrier (even if only the T7's have PTV's), plus you may get more points in the FFP as opposed to only 2 flights or non-stop.
FlyMIA From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 7477 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 6085 times:
Well if you want to have alot of fun than take KLM/NW sounds like fun AMS MSP and LHR. I have flown AA 777 international and it is great. Very nice aircraft. That would be my second choice. UA is also good because of channel 9! So hard decisions here. Have you ever been to any of these airports? Every flown KLM? Every flown a T7?
"It was just four of us on the flight deck, trying to do our job" (Captain Al Haynes)
USAF757300 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 6080 times:
I was also leaning toward NW and KL because I would fly a DC-10-30 from MSP to AMS, and then a KLM 767-300 into LHR. I dont really want to fly into London City because I would really like to see Heathrow.
Desiguy2447 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 96 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (10 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 5997 times:
UAL to LHR was really good service in business class from IAD on the 747.
I also flew on UAL on the 747 from London to IAD in economy class. The food service was great we also got ice cream for dessert. The bad part is the 747 seating. There is no leg room in the UA 747's economy class along with no PTV just the old style TV monitors.
I had the chance to fly on a UAL 777 from IAD and in economy class each seat had PTV along with some leg room. If your going in economy class and flying UAL then try to get on a 777.
Airlinerfreak From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (10 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 5994 times:
I would take AA because they will still have the MRTC on their 777's. The 777's are last to get the MRTC out. But the MRTC is great on a long haul flight. So I would take AA, I know I am very redundant sorry about that, I just think AA is the best going to LHR.