Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
What Are Your Views On The A350?  
User currently offlineHolidaycharter From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 202 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 12 months 10 hours ago) and read 5419 times:

I think airbus are doing a superb job bangin these new planes out what are your views?

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLeigh pilgrim From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2000, 392 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 12 months 8 hours ago) and read 5409 times:

I personaly think its a rush job to compete with the 787, it seems identical to the A330, the 787 seems to have had a lot more thought been put in,BUT THATS MY OWN OPINION!

User currently offlineDoona From Sweden, joined Feb 2005, 3768 posts, RR: 13
Reply 2, posted (8 years 12 months 7 hours ago) and read 5399 times:

Don't really have an opinion. Should be the A330-500. Pictures show a slightly different A330. Like a 737-100 compared to a 738 with winglets and no eyebrows. Sort of boring, perhaps. I'd like to see something new. Like a two-floor narrowbody or something...

Cheers
Mats



Sure, we're concerned for our lives. Just not as concerned as saving 9 bucks on a roundtrip to Ft. Myers.
User currently offlineCheco77 From Peru, joined Oct 2004, 1345 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (8 years 12 months 1 hour ago) and read 5383 times:

I think that the A350 is just a copy of the A330 lauched specificaly to compete against the 787 which Airbus forseed to have great succes (which is really happening). The A350 program sucks and the 787 will be more succesfull, no doubt. Just my opinion.
Regards,
Adam



Czech Boeing lover living in Lima
User currently offline727EMflyer From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 547 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 5378 times:

I like the publicity that has gone along with the 787 and the A380. It seems the A350 isn't getting much of a spotlight, but folks on the forum claim it "is" this and "is" that.... Gives me the feeling that the aircraft will be a design chasing a set of specs intended to beat Boeing; which in turn sounds like a recipe for disaster. Whatever it ends up being I hope it is equally as successful as the 787. The industry would be best served if one did not dominate the other IMHO.

User currently offlineGQfluffy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 5374 times:

Like others have said, I think it's a "rush job". Why stick with the same fuselage width as the A330/340? From what I've seen/heard on A.net, it'll have a new wing, MUCH more composites built in, new engines and some tweaked avionics, but nothing like the clean-sheet 787. I think Airbus could offer a much better product (and maybe beat the 787) if they scrapped what they have now, and start over. But...you won't see that happen. Right now, it's still too early to know what exactly the A350 will develop into to, but Airbus keeps giving me a "rush job vibe".

The next question is...Will airlines wait in line for months/years to have a 787 when a product which is almost as good is sitting there just waiting to fly more or less the next month???

fluffy


User currently offlineAerlingus330 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 834 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 5362 times:

I think in the public eye it can be seen as a "rush job", but look at this. Would you spend millions on an aircraft if it where to be a rush job, just after putting a lot of money on the A380....I dont think airbus are. Also it is in its first stages...the design will change.

AerLingus330



Aer Lingus Airbus A330-300
User currently offlineJeffry747 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 963 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 5333 times:

I was hoping for a new and unique design, but in the end it just seems to me to be a "souped up" A330. From the pictures I have seen, I cannot tell the 330 from the 350.


C'mon Big B, FLY!
User currently offlineHorizonGirl From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 807 posts, RR: 15
Reply 8, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 5326 times:

Quoting Jeffry747 (Reply 7):
I was hoping for a new and unique design, but in the end it just seems to me to be a "souped up" A330.

I'll second that.
I don't even like the A330 that much, and I had high hopes
for the A350, but it's just that. A suoped up A330.  Sad







Devon



Flying high on the Wings of the Great Northwest!
User currently offlineUsAirways16bwi From United States of America, joined May 2004, 1004 posts, RR: 4
Reply 9, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 5319 times:

Quoting Leigh pilgrim (Reply 1):
I personaly think its a rush job to compete with the 787, it seems identical to the A330, the 787 seems to have had a lot more thought been put in

I somewhat think that too. But it saves money by not changing the design too much. Plus, the A350 will be more fuel efficient. I also agree that airbus is competing with the 787.


User currently offlineMygind66 From Spain, joined May 2004, 1058 posts, RR: 12
Reply 10, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 5307 times:

I think what happened to the 787 has been a good advertising product. Shark tail...etc... and finally what you have is a modern product better than the airbus one ( well its the successor of the 757...and it should be compared to this one ). All the rest is PURE merchandising.
Airbus will produce a good a/c, similar to the 787 or even better because it has to if they want to take an slice....

Just my opinion

Enrique


User currently offlineBA380 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 1466 posts, RR: 8
Reply 11, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 5259 times:

Quoting UsAirways16bwi (Reply 9):
I also agree that airbus is competing with the 787.

no sh** Sherlock! that's the whole point!

Quoting Mygind66 (Reply 10):
I think what happened to the 787 has been a good advertising product. Shark tail...etc

sadly the shark's tail has been ditched

I can't beliwve some of teh comments on this thread... the success of an airliner does not depend on whether some enthusiasts think it looks sufficiently different from another successful member of the family. The success will be determined by total cost of ownership for airlines (commonality, fuel, cost price etc etc).



cabin crew: doors to automatic and cross-check...
User currently offlineGARPD From UK - Scotland, joined Aug 2005, 2643 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 5251 times:

Hmm its a tough call trying to figure out what the A350 is about.

I have a brochure here from Airbus that makes the A350 sound like an all singing all dance wondermachine. Of course, one should not expect any less. But their claims are misleading.
On several occasions they mention the 787 and then quote themselves a nice big fast improvement in fuel efficiency which leads you to believe it is compared to the 787.
Well, the A350 will be heavier than the 787 so they'll need to break the laws of physics in order to gain 20% fuel efficiency over the 787 using the same engines!

From everything I seen, I'm certain Airbus got caught with their pants down with. They had their heads stuck in the A380 program for too long.

Leahy and his cronies repeatedly went on record to say that the A330 was all they needed to compete with the 787. Then Boeing released more detailed information. Airbus suddenly saw the 787 was not just a pipe dream.
Then finally EK goes public and says the 787 is too small for their needs.

And that is the reason why I think Airbus are planning the A350 to be the size it is. They're running after EK and QR.

They seem to think that adding more seats is the best solution to beating the 787s proposed fuel efficiency. But Airbus seem to forget that size is not everything. Something evidenced by EK's apparent reluctance to order the A350. I read that they were not happy with Airbus's equations on the A350s CASM.

If Airbus want to get a piece of the 787s market pie... they need a similar sized jet with similar seating, range and efficiency. Not a bigger, heavier, slower and less efficient overhaul of an existing aircraft.

Oh sure, Airbus will sell the A350. They can sell ice to Eskimos and make the Antarctic sound like the Bahamas with their superb PR spin.

Overall, I think the A350 will fly. But I am certain its going to be another A340-600. A derivative which is too heavy and falls short on its promised performance.



arpdesign.wordpress.com
User currently offlineJMJAirways From Sweden, joined Apr 2005, 216 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 5242 times:

I will be the firstone to say ! I love the A350 and I hope it will be produced!

Best regards



I am willing to pay extra for a A346 flight !
User currently offlineSan747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 4942 posts, RR: 12
Reply 14, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 5235 times:

Quoting Leigh pilgrim (Reply 1):
I personaly think its a rush job to compete with the 787, it seems identical to the A330, the 787 seems to have had a lot more thought been put in,BUT THATS MY OWN OPINION!



Quoting Checo77 (Reply 3):
I think that the A350 is just a copy of the A330 lauched specificaly to compete against the 787 which Airbus forseed to have great succes (which is really happening). The A350 program sucks and the 787 will be more succesfull, no doubt. Just my opinion.
Regards,
Adam

I'm joining the bandwagon. I believe the A350 is a knee-jerk reaction to the 787 and will not do well against it, and trust me, I'm not an A or B man, I just believe this is whats gonna happen.



Scotty doesn't know...
User currently offlineLHB727230Adv From Germany, joined Mar 2005, 255 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 5224 times:

The 787 wins this duel by a mile, the A350 is just too much of a rush job to compete. I don't like the idea of a plane simply being modified to compete against another plane which is outside its class (And thereby stalling the production of the well selling A330). I hate to say this, but COME ON AIRBUS, YOU CAN DO BETTER THAN THIS.

Cheers,
Alex  bigthumbsup 


User currently offlineStall From Switzerland, joined Apr 2004, 257 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 5213 times:

Boeing did a great job with 737NG. I think Airbus will do the same with the A350.

The 787 will be more advanced but it won't be a huge advantage vs the 350( the same as the A320 vs 737 NG).

It will be a tight commercial fight between A and B. The real winners will be the airlines and their passengers.



Flying is fun
User currently offlineGARPD From UK - Scotland, joined Aug 2005, 2643 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 5205 times:

Quoting Stall (Reply 16):
Boeing did a great job with 737NG. I think Airbus will do the same with the A350.

People use this argument all the time. But unfortunately you cannot compare the projects 1 to 1 like that. They are not the same, despite external similarities.

But you are right, Boeing did a great job with the 737NG, its actually lighter than the A320 on a per seat basis. Not bad for a fuselage essentially 30 years old in basis.



arpdesign.wordpress.com
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Are Your Views :viking Airlines posted Mon Jul 10 2006 20:40:02 by Samair
What Are Your Thoughts On Monarch? posted Tue Aug 9 2005 22:36:00 by Holidaycharter
What Are Your Impressions Of The New ISP Terminal? posted Tue Aug 17 2004 03:17:23 by IslipWN
What Are Your Flying Plans For The Summer? posted Wed May 19 2004 03:44:44 by COEWR2587
What Are Your Upcoming Trip Reports? posted Thu Oct 12 2006 20:49:49 by Buck3y3nut
Your Verdict On The F100 posted Mon Sep 18 2006 13:49:56 by Curious
Your Views On Excel Airlines posted Tue Jul 11 2006 10:42:59 by ABfemme
Your Views On ATA Airlines posted Sun May 7 2006 23:08:14 by N808NWatMSP
Your Views On Virgin Atlantic posted Thu Apr 13 2006 20:49:59 by Akeytravel
Overnight/'Red Eye' Flights: What Are Your Opinion posted Mon Mar 28 2005 19:39:41 by Pe@rson