Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Best Hub In Europe?  
User currently offlineScotspanGSM From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2005, 51 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 9953 times:

in your opinion who is the best europen hub ?, LHR, CDG, AMS, FRA, MAD????, and why????

21 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineUpperDeck79 From Finland, joined Feb 2005, 1139 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 9928 times:

HEL (Helsinki-Vantaa, Finland)!

Very quick transfer time, clean, easy to navigate, great signaling (also in Chinese and Japanese!!!), helpful personnel, great architecture etc. And home to a great airline!  Smile

AY and ANA rock!
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 22865 posts, RR: 53
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 9922 times:

Of the ones I've visited (CDG, LHR, FRA, MUC, AMS), I'd have to say AMS. Easy to navigate (albeit quite spread out), no buses to deal with, doesn't look like it's under construction all the time, and has an excellent variety of shops (plus a killer observation deck  Smile ).


7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineFlymunich From Germany, joined Mar 2004, 171 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 9864 times:

1. MUC
2. MUC
3. MUC

User currently offlineMucflieger From Germany, joined Jun 2005, 126 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 9826 times:

1. MUC
2. MUC
3. MUC

User currently offlineAJRfromSYR From United States of America, joined May 2005, 454 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 9817 times:

Quoting ScotspanGSM (Thread starter):
and why????

User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 9779 times:

I'd vote for AMS -- easy to get around, no terminals to switch between, well lit, and generally decent views of airplanes.


User currently offlineCarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 3049 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 9765 times:

Big hub: FRA
Smaller hub: VIE

User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 29179 posts, RR: 50
Reply 8, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 9750 times:

Air France's hub at CDG offers the greatest number of connection opportunities of any European hub.
The airport also has the largest capacity growth potential of the current major European hub airports.

However if one want to look at it on a per carrier basis, Lufthansa ranks number one with the greatest connectivity, but this is only accomplished via split hubs in FRA & MUC.

From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineEHHO From Netherlands, joined Dec 2005, 815 posts, RR: 7
Reply 9, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 9729 times:

Yes, I'll join the AMS choir: give me Schiphol anytime!!

Only one terminal, great connections, including many LCCs, a wonderful place to do a stopover (well-connected with the rest of the country), great observation deck..

And.. Mind your step!  cheerful   melting 

"Get your facts first. Then you may distort them as much as you please" -- Mark Twain
User currently offlineDstc47 From Ireland, joined Sep 1999, 1609 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 9627 times:

AMS - by a long measure is the most user friendly, with a pretty good home carrier too.

CDG is confused, crowded and smoke filled. Less than helpful Airport staff add to the pleasures.

FRA is nearly as confused, with ambiguous signage - easily rectified but never is.

LHR is just the pits, long walks, slow service.

User currently offlineBrightCedars From Belgium, joined Nov 2004, 1291 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 9626 times:

I'll cast my vote for AMS! Although BRU is very nice too but lacks the essential quality of a real hub nowadays: lots of routes and airlines!

Actually, I'm starting to prefer driving to AMS (2 hours from home at 0€/$ with my company car) than to fly from BRU (10 mins drive from home).

The fact that I'm finding cheaper fares out of AMS on the same airlines and same days than BRU is also part of the equation (got an AZ return AMS-BEY for a factor of 1 while their BRU-BEY on the same dates was like 1.6 and the cheapest from BRU - on OA, if they exist by then - was like 1.25).

I want the European Union flag on airliners.net!
User currently offlineBA757 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2832 posts, RR: 13
Reply 12, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 9614 times:

AMS no doubt.

MUC is also pretty damn good.


User currently offlineSK909 From Denmark, joined Nov 2005, 261 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 9540 times:

CPH  Smile

The best airport in Europe. Open, wide, light, and user friendly. Although there aren't as many destinations as other airports.

Life's for Living!
User currently offlinePavlovsDog From Norway, joined Sep 2005, 667 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 9507 times:

1. CPH- Really nice. Great shopping. Like a smaller, nicer Amsterdam
2. AMS- Good but not as good as CPH.
3. MUC- For a new airport it could me more stylish. It works fine but it's like they didn't want to spend any money on embellishment. Lack of English signage at some of the service establishments is a big minus.


LHR- I gladly pay more to transfer elsewhere. One time flying OSL-LHR-YYZ on SK/AC I missed my flight due to the absurd security procedures. My flight from OSL got in 25 minutes late. I thought that would be no problem. There was still 45 minutes until departure. The gate for the AC flight was opposite from where the SK flight arrived so I thought I had plenty of time to spare. At the gate there was security with a metal detector and the whole nine yards. As I approached it I was told that I would first have to go through the security at the center of the terminal. The lines there were of course long. I can't see that the security procedure there was any more comprehensive than that at the gate. I missed my flight.

That was 7 years ago and the last time I used LHR as anything but a destination.

User currently offlineCedars747 From Norway, joined Dec 2005, 2723 posts, RR: 17
Reply 15, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 9500 times:

My heart says CPH and my head says AMS

Tengo una pasion por la aviacion !لدي شغف للطيران !I have a passion for aviation !Jeg har en lidenskap for luftfart!j'ai
User currently offlineB707321C From Norway, joined Sep 2005, 172 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 9486 times:

AMS - Probably the best, Very clean. Everything at one level. Good connections.

CDG - Very good, when you get used to it (except transfer between Term 1 and Term 2). Probably have the best connections. Friendly staff.

MUC- Very nice terminal with good connections.

LHR - My least favorit. Very dirty, difficult connections, staff not very helpful.

User currently offline777klm From China, joined Apr 2005, 567 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 9403 times:

Off course I like my home airport AMS, good connections, clean, more than enough shops, a lot of space, clear announcements, and a very good home carrier!
I also like the Scandinavian airports ARN and CPH, always clean, nice people and state of the art!

Next flight: AMS - BCN - EZE
User currently offlineCph757 From Denmark, joined Sep 2005, 684 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 9378 times:

I think AMS i a bit better than CPH, offering more services, and they have the observation deck. But CPH Is a really nice airport, and even though you something have to walk a lot, it's much less walking than AMS.

Those two are my favourite choices.

When it comes to CDG, i would call it the worst I have experienced.

Quoting B707321C (Reply 16):
CDG - Very good, when you get used to it (except transfer between Term 1 and Term 2). Probably have the best connections. Friendly staff.

You have to get used to it, because the navigation and signing in terminal 2 is awful (read: French). The staff is not especially helpful. The design makes the terminals hard to maneuvre in no time because of crowding. The shops close even before the sun goes down, and they are not where people want them. Transferring inside T2, you have to exit a sterile area and re-enter another, resulting in another time consuming security check, why? The only nice thing I can think about with CDG (having only visited T2) is the departure monitors at the long haul gates, showing destination and weather information, and off course the skywindow in Terminal 2E Big grin

Last flight: SAW-CPH on H9 on 02/11/09 - Next Flights: 23/12/09 CPH-AAL on QI, 30/12/09 CPH-LHR on SK, 19/01/10 CPH-CDG-
User currently offlineBuckieboy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 9371 times:


My vote also goes for AMS for many of the reasons stated above. Also, I feel that I am never more than 20 minutes walk from any two gates. I've never stepped outside the terminal, so I cannot say what its like to get hire cars etc (a particular gripe with LHR), however as a transit passenger I have never had any negative experiences.



User currently offlineACDC8 From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 8029 posts, RR: 32
Reply 20, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 9351 times:

AMS is my favourite Hub, since it's the home of KLM. Easy to connect as well and a pleasant airport overall.

FRA is a great Hub, thanks to LH and it's strong Star Alliance Presence there, your destination possibilities are almost endless. The airport is somewhat crowded, hard to navigate (for first timers) and dirty, yet it does have some charm. Not to mention the worlds most incredible observation deck.

A Grumpy German Is A Sauerkraut
User currently offlineHjulicher From Liechtenstein, joined Feb 2005, 936 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 9302 times:

I've flown through FRA, AMS, CDG, PRG, MUC and BCN and of course SVO. Whenever possible, I try to connect in AMS. Ever since I was young, AMS offers more to its passengers than any other terminal in europe. In terms of ease for airlines, AMS is tricky and taxi times are longer than say MUC, but for passengers once in the terminal, I think AMS is much better than MUC. MUC is a nice airport, but for how new it is, it's very outdated is some respects. In AMS schengen countries are nicely split between concourses, making connecting an ease. The staff is incredible helpful, and the airport is constantly being upgrades. KLM/NW is also a great alliance to fly with when travelling to/from North America. They have great shops as well as many restaurants, and I even remember the very important internet cafe someplace on the 2nd floor. Getting into AMS is very easy as well, and much faster than from CDG and much, much, much faster/shorter than from MUC.

MUC is a great airport, but for being built only 10 years ago, it suffers some flaws that you wouldn't expect. This is true of CDG as well. Why is it that once you enter the gates area in these two airports, you're stuck sitting there with no place to roam or go? It would make more sense to me to have the gates area filled with shops and places to eat while waiting for the flight. Also, terminal one has 4 concourses, and you cannot walk to each one without re-entering germany. This of course isn't very convenient. When arriving from AMS, I had to go through a pseudo passport control, and them baggage arrival is sort of awkward too. Nevertheless pleasant and not negative. I didn't like the long underground walk from the terminal though to get to the train station. I like walking, but it was all underground, and with all your stuff... skis, two bags, carry-on luggage, it's a far distance to walk.

BCN also has a nice airport, but I know that it is in no way a hub like the others.

LH 442
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Ryanair The Best LCC In Europe posted Wed Jun 1 2005 13:11:13 by Ncfc99
Help! Plane Best Airports In Europe For Spotting posted Thu Mar 24 2005 00:59:15 by Jumbojet
Best Airline Australia-Europe In Y? posted Sat Apr 29 2006 02:09:00 by QANTASforever
Best Route Out Of Any Airline Hub In The U.S posted Tue Aug 10 2004 23:58:01 by Bushcheney2004
Best Airport In The U.S. posted Fri Nov 17 2006 03:19:26 by DC10extender
AMS - Best Airport In The World! posted Wed Oct 18 2006 15:52:19 by RicardoFG
Best Hub For The New Varig posted Sat Jul 29 2006 19:11:25 by C010T3
Spotting Trip Using LLC's In Europe posted Wed Jun 28 2006 20:43:40 by Egmcman
Best Window In UA 777 (Econ Plus) - Help Please posted Fri May 26 2006 06:36:01 by Capt.Fantastic
Help Needed - LX Or LH In Europe? posted Fri May 5 2006 15:58:46 by Airlinefreak1