Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AC, BA Or Zoom To LHR From YVR  
User currently offlinePpostro From Canada, joined Jun 2005, 36 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 9296 times:

I am travelling to London for some project work in late January for a few weeks. I am looking at my options for carriers. Looking at just price BA is the most expensive at $876.00 return in Y class (i am traveling in Y class), AC is second being $790.00 return and Zoom is the cheapest at $649 return, however they fly into LGW not LHR. Who offers the best seat, service, meal, entertainment and overall value on this route? I am thinking AC might be the way to go, but then Zoom has had fairly positive reviews. I've heard BA World Traveller 32" seat pitch is not as a good as AC at 34". Any thoughts, comments, advice is welcome!

The über airline nerd
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineIMatAMS From Netherlands, joined Feb 2005, 326 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 9267 times:

For entertainment, BA I think has PTV's in Y. AC's 343's don't. However they usually have a quite good mainscreen selection.
Can't compare them to ba, 'cause I never flew BA longhaul, but AC's economy seats on the 333 and 343 are VERY comfy. good seat pitch and, most important, a very good seat design that keeps you really comfortable... I'd go for AC, but then, can't really compare the different options..


User currently offlineMKandiah From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2005, 11 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 9152 times:

Over the past 25 years, I have done this route more times than I care to remember on both AC and BA - I've never flown with Zoom. I prefer BA because of their in-flight entertainment - not only do you have PTV but you also have a number of channels to choose from. I don't tend to like AC's selection of films because, inevitably on a flight as long as the one from YVR and LHR, there'll be a mediocre Canadian film and I don't think they pace the entertainment well. As I find it impossible to either read or sleep on flights, I find having constant and varied in flight entertainment to be a great bonus. Additionally, I generally find BA's catering and general level of service to be better than AC's. AC's flight attendants, with some notable exceptions, tend to be a rather lazy lot. Personally, I don't find much difference between BA's 32 seat pitch and AC's 34. Consequently, if I can afford it, I fly BA.

User currently offlineDavidT From Switzerland, joined Oct 2005, 478 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 9147 times:

I'd go with BA. Good service, okay seats and a lot of tv to choose from. Plus its a 747  Smile

User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19610 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 9123 times:

You're gonna get a lot of bias based on where each member comes from.  Wink

"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlineLongHauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 6053 posts, RR: 43
Reply 5, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 9085 times:

I have always found BA to be a very civil airline, with a sterling reputation. Every flight on which I have flown has always been the same .... good on-time departure record, clean aircraft, professional flight attendants. In-flight service has always been leading edge. And that goes back to the old BOAC days when flying on a VC-10 from ANU to JFK, or LHR to NAI!

While, AC is no less safe, and also has a "diabolical" internal drive to be on time, we seem to be hit and miss on flight attendant friendliness. But I would have thought the YVR based f/a's would be friendlier than the ones we encounter from time to time out of YUL. Catering is subjective, but I feel AC has the edge on comfort. As far as IFE, it depends on whether you encounter an aircraft with the new AVOD PTVs, as they are being installed as we speak.

But if I were choosing .... I'd go with Zoom, just for the "adventure" factor alone. LGW is fine if you are not looking for connections. And hey, its probably an airline you have never flown, possibly an aircraft type you have never flown and certainly a safety card you don't have!  Smile

Just because I stopped arguing, doesn't mean I think you are right. It just means I gave up!
User currently offlineCPDC10-30 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4992 posts, RR: 22
Reply 6, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 9083 times:

Deleted post, missed that you are flying from YVR and not YYZ

[Edited 2006-01-07 17:12:22]

User currently offlineDreamflight767 From United States of America, joined Dec 2008, 147 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 9020 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Go ZOOM! We need information/reports on them. You can be the guinea pig LOL. (Is that spelt right?)

User currently offlineYVRtoYYZ From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 679 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 9018 times:

I would suggest Zoom. I flew them in Sept/Oct 2005 YYZ-GLA return in their Premium Economy. Outstanding service, approx. 36" pitch, leather seats, dedicated front cabin, complementary amenities kit, complementary wine, etc, etc, etc.

Only drawback is that it is on an older B763, but I like those aircraft so it didn't bother me. IFE was consisted of your standard 3 movies and then filler TV shows. But if you have a computer or travelling with someone, the time goes by quickly.

Well worth the extra $110 and would not hesitate to make them my first choice when flying across the Pond again.

Sorry no trip report as I didn't take too many details and only have pictures of the flight deck (C-GZMM).

Contact me if you would like further details.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
NW/KL, BA, AA, Or UA To LHR. posted Mon May 9 2005 02:07:14 by USAF757300
BA Or VS To MCO? posted Sat Sep 2 2006 15:27:54 by LMML 14/32
BA Or QR To Dubai? posted Sat Sep 2 2006 10:57:26 by Airsnaps
BA Or QF To Australia? posted Thu Jul 13 2006 05:18:23 by Alitalia777
KE Or OZ To Seoul From JFK posted Fri Mar 10 2006 22:02:35 by PZ707
AA To LHR From ORD! Need Travel Advice! posted Mon Oct 31 2005 05:04:29 by Tsaord
AZ, BA, Or U2 To Rome? posted Thu Sep 1 2005 21:23:31 by Geoffm
AA, UA, Or VS To LHR? posted Wed Mar 23 2005 20:25:48 by Yanksn4
The Best Non-Stop Way To LHR From Cleveland posted Mon Aug 30 2004 02:47:36 by ConcordeLoss
EL Al Or Continental To Israel From DCA posted Wed Jul 7 2004 22:55:23 by TranStar