GSM763 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4918 times:
I'll answer your question in order (I flew on a Q400)
1. No it was downright noisy. I know Bombardier go on and on about how quiet it is. We also had quite a bumpy approach into Bordaux.
2. Not exactly roomy but it was clean though I think clenleness is more a matter for the airline (in this case flybe) than Bombardier
3. Yes so long as you are under 6 foot 5 otherwise it would be a bit of a struggle
4. Not massive but big enough for a laptop bag. Anything bigger than about 3 metres by 6 wouldn't fit up there.
In conclusion it's an OK commuter aircraft but I would'nt want to be on it for more than 2 hours.
Skymileman From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4893 times:
1. Yes, by far the quietest, smoothest turboprop I've ever been on.
2. It is much more spacious and comfortable than similar CRJ-700.
3. Lavs are big for a commuter aircraft.
4. Overhead bins are still small just like on the CRJ.
Overall, the Q400 is one of my two favorite aircraft.
Olympicbis From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 4865 times:
I flew twice on it with SAS Commuter and once more on a Wideroe. It is indeed more silent than the ATR42/72 - 200 series ( I have not yet flown in a more modern -500 to compare ). But what I liked most was the take-off performance : really impressive and seems that the pilots did have a lot of fun with it each time !
SX36 From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 73 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4821 times:
I have flown on the Q-400 series aircraft operated by QX between SEA and GEG and really enjoyed it. I found it to be quiet, smooth, clean and comfortable. I have another flight on the "Quiet One" coming up very soon, this time between BIL and SEA. My Itenerary says it a 2 hour turboprop ride, and I am looking forward to it. Now for the first leg of my trip I am on a Saab 340 only for an hour and am dreading that flight
SerbianSkies From Serbia, joined Jan 2006, 16 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4806 times:
Have flown it several times recently on Tyrolean's service between VIE and BEG, and once Cimber Air from CPH to Palanga, Lithuania. It's always been an enjoyable experience and as others have said roomier than some regional jets.
Spectre242 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 128 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 4689 times:
I have been on flyBE's Q400's several times between Belfast City and Newcastle. Whilst they are not as quiet as 737s I didn't find the noise or vibrations to be a problem at all. It is a rather a small and narrow aircraft but I find the seats themselves to be perfectly satisfactory in terms of comfort and leg room. In saying that however the BHD-NCL flights are only about 45 minutes of less usually, so I dont know how comfortably they would be on a longer stage route. The overhead bins are much smaller than on 737A320s, as you would expect, particularly height wise, but you have to expect that with a narrow plane. I dont know how they compare with CRJs though.
easyJet run another Belfast-Newcastle route in 737s and the only way I choose between them and flyBE is who has the better price for the day, I don't favour either for choice of aircraft.
Planecrazy2 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 615 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (9 years 3 months 1 day ago) and read 4548 times:
I flew the Q400 on the LAX-RNO-LAX route with QX. On the ground it felt loud and bumpy. In the air it was fairly quiet and smooth. The cabin felt roomy for a regional aircraft. Much better than the CRJ but I still prefer the CR7.
Frugalqxnwa From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 565 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (9 years 3 months 23 hours ago) and read 4499 times:
When I flew the Q400 BOI-SEA with QX, I thought it was very comparable to the crj-200 except the windows were much easier to look out of (haven't flown the cr7 yet, so can't compare). The ride was smooth and quiet, but I was a bit cramped in the seat as I would be on a crj200. Didn't use the lav, I went b4 getting on and after getting off. The Q400 is a good aircraft and I would ride it again on the shorter runs.
DesertFlyer From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 518 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (9 years 3 months 22 hours ago) and read 4484 times:
I fly them fairly often from PSP-SMF and back on QX. They are definately not loud for a prop, and I've never found one aircraft to be more rough than another. It felt a bit more comfortable on this flight than the CRJ-700's were back when they started it. The overhead bins were the average size for a plane this size, same as the CRJs as far as I could tell. I find the CR7s to be very quiet, but I don't find that much of a difference in the actual flight experience. All in all, it's a great plane to fly on and quite tollerable for 1.5hour flights. They climb great out of PSP even when it's 120 degrees F!
A340Spotter From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1984 posts, RR: 23
Reply 14, posted (9 years 3 months 22 hours ago) and read 4462 times:
I have flown on both QX and SK and have been impressed with the airplane. The legs I took were SEA-YYC and ARN-ZRH, with that leg nearly 3 hours long. ARN was warm on the day we left (near 70F) and although the airplane was a bit warm when we boarded, by the time we took off, the comfort level increased.
Takeoff on the Q400 is quite jetlike, smooth and rotation as if you were on a 737. Enroute, smooth and not noisy at all to me. Gives you a lulling sensation, great if you are looking at catching a nap. Space is all up to the individual airline, but these two (QX/SK) have comfortable cabins to me, 6ft 3in...
Now if only CO would order them...
"Irregardless, it's a Cat III airplane, we don't need an alternate!"
Goodmanr From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 297 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (9 years 3 months 21 hours ago) and read 4449 times:
I've flow on an OS/Tyrolean Q400 a few times from GVA-VIE I like them quite a bit. I found it to be quiet and didn't feel the vibrations like I usually do on prop planes. A really comfortable amount of space makes it a very nice ride. It sure is a long plane though...
PlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11926 posts, RR: 59
Reply 18, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 4302 times:
I flew the same route as you Raffik last Thursday (BHX-EDI-BHX with FlyBe), although coming back I got the BAe146-200 which was a pleasant surprise!
I found the seats to be average, although there could have been a little more arm room. The ride was very smooth for a prop aircraft as was the landing, and the takeoff was much more fun than I had expected, very swift acceleration and a rapid climb-out. Comparing it against the non Q version of the Dash8-300 which I flew BRS-PLH a couple of hours ago with Air Southwest, there is no competition - without a doubt the older version has more vibration, shaking and noise in the cabin. But - I still prefer the 300 to the 400, with a load of 23 it was airborne this evening in just over 10 seconds.
...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
HorizonGirl From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 808 posts, RR: 15
Reply 19, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4298 times:
This is my favourite aircraft for a reason.
Everything about it seems good.
I love how it looks, how comfortable it is, and how it sounds.
(or how it doesn't sound)
Gotta love the Q400.
There is something, however, that I love about loud, bumpy turboprops.
Quoting Macc (Reply 10): the look of the engines is embarassing.
Vhqpa From Australia, joined Jul 2005, 1524 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (9 years 2 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 4296 times:
I flew on the Q400 last Sunday
1. Fairly quiet I noticed it to be a bit more quieter then the Previous Dash 8 variants.
2. On Qantaslink/Sunstate I found it ok I'm aproximently 5ft 6in tall the seat pitch was quite suffiecint although a couple of the pax did bump their heads on the overhead bins when disembarking because the aircraft was brand new (Built January 2006) the aircraft was spotless.
3. Sorry I never used the lav
4. I didn't use the overhead bins either but they were quite compact conpared to 737's, A320's etc.
"There you go ladies and gentleman we're through Mach 1 the speed of sound no bumps no bangs... CONCORDE"