Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SJC New Terminal  
User currently offlineFlamedude707 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 235 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2647 times:

As the city council decides whether to fund the 300 or so million dollars for the new terminal and improvements at SJC, I wanted to hear the opinions of other locals onhow they feel on the plan. I personally think it is a wase of money. They could easily make minor improvements using far less money. An airport doesnt need to be a grand ballroom. Well, lets hear your opinions.

Time you enjoy wasting, is not wasted.
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineAirWillie6475 From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 2448 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (10 years 6 days ago) and read 2643 times:

I've been through both terminals. The AA and Southwest terminals are perfectly fine. The other side that has the other airlines seemed a little left behind in terms of how it looked from the inside. And it felt like it was cramped at the gate waiting areas.

User currently offlineAirCop From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (10 years 6 days ago) and read 2636 times:

Well, with AA downsizing at SJC, where is the need for an upgrading of the old terminal? It does seem like a waste, the city will have to realize that SJC will always be a stepchild to SFO.

User currently offlineStealth777 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 392 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2613 times:

even though AA is downsizing their SJC ops, don't forget they share that terminal with WN. I wouldn't be surprised if WN used up those gates opened by AA leaving. And the 2nd terminal needs to be improved, especially if all of the other carriers serving your airport flies from that one terminal. A little crowded don't ya think?
of course thats just my  twocents 

User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2588 times:

The current C terminal is a poor design for today's world (with multiple security areas, somme of which don't even have restrooms beyond security). The midfield terminal will be a good replacement for that, and hopefully stimulate a bit more business.

I hope they continue to scale back the grandiose plans that were originally envisioned, though. SJC is clearly going to be a smaller regional airport for some time. With the end of AA's SJC-NRT flights in October, the only widebody pax machine will be HA's daily flight.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Ladies And Gentlemen: Madrid's New Terminal (T4) posted Wed Oct 19 2005 11:38:33 by HEGAN
New Terminal At HOU posted Wed Apr 21 2004 22:46:19 by Ssides
Oklahoma City (OKC) New Terminal posted Sat Feb 8 2003 10:33:03 by Ouboy79
Midway Airport New Terminal Pics posted Fri Jun 14 2002 19:14:39 by Midway DC9-10
What Are Your Impressions Of The New ISP Terminal? posted Tue Aug 17 2004 03:17:23 by IslipWN
New International Terminal PHL posted Tue Apr 29 2003 18:16:12 by UALPHLCS
DFW's New International Terminal posted Sun Jun 2 2002 03:07:04 by Saxman66
New AA JFK Terminal? posted Fri May 3 2002 05:15:52 by Blink182
RTW With The New OneWorld posted Sun Nov 5 2006 14:12:59 by EIRules
Which Is Better New Or Used Biz Jet posted Thu Nov 2 2006 12:46:41 by UAEflyer