Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Mc Donnell Douglas A/C Being Called Boeing A/C  
User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3684 posts, RR: 2
Posted (8 years 4 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2082 times:

I was reading a post, ware some body said they did not like Boeing claining the F-15. It got me to thinking, Boeing has taken credict for a lot of good Mc Donnell Douglas aircrafts. MD design and built some of the greatest military aircraft today, for example the F-15. Boeing could not design a fighter like this. I have seen some Boeing fighter design and they look to big and to heavy. They also took cerdict for the C-17. Should they Keep calling them MD as a tribut to Mc Donnell Douglas, are do think MD product should be call Boeings now.

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePavlin From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 2077 times:

I guess you are right. Like Boeing MD-11 or Boeing MD-80. C-17, F-15, F-18.....

User currently offlineDougloid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2065 times:

I worked for Douglas and I hate that shit. Unless they say "This is the Boeing MD11 and we killed it."

User currently offlineYYZflyer From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 3643 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2049 times:

I have nothing against Boeing but couldn't they leave the names of the a/c alone? Like the "Boeing" DC-10.


Avoid hangovers, stay drunk.
User currently offlineJBo From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 2363 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2032 times:

I think for the sake of brand recognition, aircraft currently in production by Boeing, whether originally by MDC or not, should wear the "Boeing" name. It simply makes sense.

Aircraft no longer in production by Boeing that wore the MDC name should keep the MDC name, such as the MD-80 and MD-11

It would also make sense for some models to be referred to as both, like say the "Boeing/McDonnell Douglas" F-15. Or something like that.



I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance any day.
User currently offlineWingscrubber From UK - England, joined Sep 2001, 852 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2025 times:

Boeing acquired McDonnel Douglas and its designs(I think), so all MD-designed aircraft still flying now fall under the Boeing brand, but this doesn't make them any less MD-designed aircraft.


Resident TechOps Troll
User currently offlineMemphis From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 143 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 4 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2016 times:

I am a fan of Boeing, yet, in this instance, I think that they should have kept the MD/DC name with the corresponding aircraft! It would reduce confusion and give the credit for the design of the aircraft where it is due, in this case to MD/DC, not simply who built the plane last or who has the "rights" to the name. To have a display sign in front of a C-47 at an airshow that read the "Boeing C-47" would be in my opinion, wrong.


nocturnal
User currently offlineN8076U From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 425 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (8 years 4 months 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 2007 times:

It makes you wonder if there was any uproar when McDonnell and Douglas merged? Although, at least when that happened, the Douglas name stayed, and the aircraft kept the "DC", including the post-merger DC-10.

Even though Boeing bought out MD, and I would say they legally have every right to call the aircraft whatever they want, it does seem somehow wrong, as to me it taints the legacy of all aircraft ever made/designed by Douglas or McD. And no, I am not anti-Boeing in any way, FYI.  Wink

Chris



Don't blame me, I don't work here...
User currently offlineB52murph From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 241 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 4 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1979 times:

Let's not forget North American-Rockwell, either, which brought us the B-1B. Yet, the B-1s I worked on a few years ago in South Dakota had Boeing labels all over the marketing materials.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
An Airplane Worthy Of Being Called The 2nd Dakota posted Sun Sep 18 2005 22:20:29 by DLKAPA
Boeing/Airbus/Douglas/L1011 Doors posted Mon Apr 15 2002 06:00:45 by B777Boeing
Boeing 737-800 Vs Airbus 320 - Which Is Smoother? posted Thu Nov 9 2006 05:03:17 by Biddleonia007
Are Old Boeing 707 Engines Really That Loud? posted Wed Nov 1 2006 02:15:59 by TimePilot
Airbus Vs Boeing Over The Pond posted Tue Oct 31 2006 03:30:21 by QXatFAT
Will Boeing Bring Out The B777-300LR? posted Wed Oct 18 2006 14:11:15 by 8herveg
What Do You Like About The Boeing 707? posted Thu Sep 21 2006 18:11:00 by 747400sp
Qantas Boeing 767-300 posted Sun Sep 17 2006 08:26:43 by Ag92
Favorite Boeing / Airbus posted Sat Sep 16 2006 19:58:38 by KSUpilot
What Do You Like About The Boeing 737. posted Fri Sep 8 2006 04:09:48 by 747400sp