Chase From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 1054 posts, RR: 0 Posted (8 years 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2064 times:
Just wondering, how long does a trip need to be for you to decide to fly instead of drive (or take the train, if you live in an area with good train service)?
For me, the threshold is right around 7 hours by car - farther than that I'll fly, closer than that I'll drive. I live in Indianapolis, which only has nonstop flights to a couple dozen or so destinations, btw.
IAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2052 times:
Call me crazy, drive time 2 hour max, end of story. Having said that I've been on flights that I could have driven round trip in less time that the flight took with weather delays etc,. but still 2 hours is tops.
Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
DesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7762 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1973 times:
4-5 hours max. Less if there is direct n/s service.
With some destinations that are right on the edge of the fly/drive zone, then price will be my first consideration, then the value of my time/time of year will be the other. I am more willing to drive in the summertime vs. the winter.
Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
BoomBoom From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1973 times:
Depends on how long it takes to fly. A 345 mile trip that normally takes 6 hours driving took 8 flying. Arrive at the airport an hour early, make a connection in another city, get from the airport to my final destination. Flying can be exhausting!
And if you drive you don't have to rent a car at the airport.
LTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13042 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (8 years 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1973 times:
I live in Northern New Jersey and work in NYC. For Phildelphia, Baltimore and similar locations along the Amtrak for work, I would use the train. If to DC from NYC, then fly the shuttle. Unless the location would be difficult to reach by a nearby airport, and about less than a 5 hour drive, then it's flying time.
PlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11617 posts, RR: 60
Reply 7, posted (8 years 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1878 times:
I work out most of my journeys like this;
up to 2 miles:- Walk.
2-20 miles:- Bike.
20-100 miles:- Bus or car.
100-150 miles:- Train or bus.
over 150 miles:- Fly.
I live in the Southwest of England, its a nuisance to get in and out of - the trains are slow and bumpy due to the line and its often closed, the roads take forever and even flying sometimes is difficult due to weather conditions. For the most part though, its cheaper to fly anything more than about 150 miles.
...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
IFEMaster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1869 times:
I'm about 5 to 7 hours, depending on factors. For example, I can drive from OC to Las Vegas in about 4.5 to 5 hours on a good day, but with the current roadworks on the 15 freeway, it's more like a 6 to 8 hour drive. So right now, I elect to fly. Generally speaking though, 7 hours is my absolute max.
Of course, flying is a lot more fun than driving, so I often look for excuses to fly
CaptainJon From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (8 years 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1857 times:
depends...usually 5-7 hours ill drive, especially if i desire to have a car at the destination city. if im going to a city ill just fly, i live in northern new jersey (20-30 mins from EWR), so pretty much further south than DC and further north than boston, and dont ask about points west, i never go to PA...
RoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9511 posts, RR: 52
Reply 10, posted (8 years 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1847 times:
I agree that 5-7 hours is the threshold, but it depends on multiple factors. If I am going for just a day, I'll fly so that I don't spend all of that time driving. However for a longer trip, I'm more eager to drive since I'll have my car and the drive isn't as much of a hassle. Another factor is if there are nonstop flights. If I have to make a connection, I could end up taking longer to fly, and I wouldn't want to do that. Also it can depend on whether or not I have to pay for the ticket. I'm more likely to spend someone else's money like my employer's to fly for a showerter trip.
The shortest flight I've taken is IND-ORD. I would have driven but I was only spending one night there and my meeting was at the O'Hare Hilton, so flying made sense.
If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
FireFly From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 91 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (8 years 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1847 times:
I really love driving, but also love flying (not airports, but actually taking off, the flight and landing...). Used to think 8 to 10 hours was the cutoff, because of not having my own car in the city I'm visiting.
But with $3+ gallon gas, I just returned yesterday from SEA (a mere 3 hours north of home) and flew on UA. The ticket price was cheaper than gas up and back would have cost. For a deal like that, I can happily justify the expense and inconvenience of a rental against the joy of flight (even on an Embraer 120!).
"Bury me at sea, boys; where no murdered ghosts can haunt me" MacGowan
DeltaGuy767 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 660 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (8 years 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1822 times:
For me it depends. I live in Milford CT, right on the CT shore to the West of New Haven. I can hop on a train and be in NYC in less than 1.5 hours, so usually I can get a direct flight anywhere I'm going from JFK/EWR/LGA. Unless it's less than 150 miles, I'll drive. But now if it's on Amtrak's Northeast Corridor BOS-Washington, I'll hop on the Acela. If I'm going to an area in N. New England (Distance/No major airports) I'll rent a Cessna and fly myself there.
Vatveng From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 954 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (8 years 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1814 times:
If I can drive it in a day, then the deciding factor is "How much will the rental car cost me if I fly?" If I'm going to be at my destination a long time, renting a car there might not be feasible. Like my recent 10-day trip to Florida... I could afford the flight and the hotel for that many days but renting a car in Florida is exhorbitant to say the least... 10 days of a car rental would have cost more than the flight and hotel combined! So I decided to drive.
DeltaGator From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 6341 posts, RR: 13
Reply 17, posted (8 years 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1810 times:
Depends on many things...time of year, cost, personal vs. business. A good example would be that I will drive to my parents' house in the Winston-Salem area which 5.5 hours from ATL but I flew every week to a client engagement in Greensboro/Burlington area of NC which is only 30 miles or so farther East of Winston.
"If you can't delight in the misery of others then you don't deserve to be a college football fan."
TransIsland From Bahamas, joined Mar 2004, 2044 posts, RR: 9
Reply 19, posted (8 years 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1802 times:
Hmm.. up to 500 ft. I walk - Then I get to a busy road with no sidewalk. (At work I get to walk longer distances though, and I do walk through town, but I have to get there by car/bike.)
Up to 27 miles, I drive, then I run out of island.
Anything else is either by boat or by plane for me.
I'm an aviation expert. I have Sky Juice for breakfast.
Levent From France, joined Sep 2004, 1718 posts, RR: 5
Reply 22, posted (8 years 3 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 1771 times:
Quoting Chase (Thread starter): Just wondering, how long does a trip need to be for you to decide to fly instead of drive
I would prefer to fly anytime! I love to drive, but nothing beats an airplane...
But I would say about four to five hours or so. It depends on a number of things: cost of driving vs flying, but also road conditions. While I love to drive in Germany, I would much rather fly in Turkey, for example.
I made a couple of long trips by car, the most being about 3000 kms from Holland to Turkey spread over three days. But there is a big difference between 3 days by car and 3 hours by plane!
Aerorobnz From Rwanda, joined Feb 2001, 7172 posts, RR: 13
Reply 24, posted (8 years 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1728 times:
It depends on how much it costs to fly - some of the shortest flights are the most expensive. Secondly it depends on the type of driving, and where exactly I'm going. New Zealand isn't a big country (slightly larger in size than The UK) so it's pretty easy to drive around. Generally apart from WLG I would drive anywhere
in the North Island.
: Flying will ALWAYS be my preferred mode of transport, but when required, I will drive/travel up to 5 hours; then will feel the need to be on an airpla
: Different story in the UK with petrol prices rising everyday its cheaper to fly than drive But personally, if my destination had an airport that i cou
: Depends on the trip particulars. Having been a commercial driver, max daily driving time is usually ten hours not counting stops. If I am in an area w
: my airport is 40 minutes away when traffics good so anything with any airport after that I will fly if possible.
: About 200 miles, or 4 hours. Over that, I will always fly. Actually, I'm trying to figure an itinerary that will test that threshold... I want to visi
: Depends a bit. If I have only a day available, I fly to Auckland as it's five hours drive each way. Wellington not quite as bad. If it's a two day tri