Sponsor Message:
Travel Polls & Prefs Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Best Hub For The New Varig  
User currently offlineC010T3 From Brazil, joined Jul 2006, 3681 posts, RR: 19
Posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 5556 times:

The few routes that Varig is going to operate in the next weeks are flown out of GRU with the sole exception of GIG-EZE. That is a very strange development in Varig's strategy, given the fact that GIG is the airport in which Varig has the best structure: best lounge, most comfortable terminal, maintenance and so on, not to mention the headquarters near SDU. It is also necessary to emphasize that Varig lived its Golden Age using GIG as a hub and its crisis started by the time GRU's operation overcame GIG. Wouldn't it be more prudent to ditch GRU now, since the big competition there will definitely be an obstacle now that the company is considered unreliable by most passengers?

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePPSMA From Brazil, joined Aug 2005, 157 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 5534 times:

My opinion is that GIG alone cannot generate enough traffic to guarantee a healthy operation. Having said that both GOL and TAM have been building up a strong hub of their own there, so it might also be a bit risky for RG.

But then again, what else is left?

Cheers



Aviation is my thing!
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8938 posts, RR: 40
Reply 2, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 5498 times:

CGH is TAM's and GOL's hub, not GRU. Varig should stick with GRU.

Remember that RG's owners is its ex-cargo subsidiary, so cargo is a big influence. SDU is no good for cargo, CGH isn't that great either and neither is GIG.

I believe Infraero should limit CGH to smaller aircraft- nothing greater than a 737 or A320; preferably A319/B73G. Varig could offer CGH Shuttle with the 737 or imagine how cool it would be to have E-jets flying back and forth?

And remember- while RG has weaken domestically at GRU, Sao Paulo is still a Star Alliance hub so you have to consider all the market that comes from abroad.

Cheers

[Edited 2006-07-29 19:58:26]


"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlineJrosa From Brazil, joined Jun 2005, 367 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 5443 times:

I think that Varig operations these days were and in the next weeks and will be very incipient. Therefore, it is very premature to draw conclusions concerning hubs, routes and fleet until the new management is able to really catch up Varig's operations.

The first effective step of New Varig was yesterday when the number of dismissed employees was released.


User currently offlineC010T3 From Brazil, joined Jul 2006, 3681 posts, RR: 19
Reply 4, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 5349 times:

Quoting Jrosa (Reply 3):
I think that Varig operations these days were and in the next weeks and will be very incipient. Therefore, it is very premature to draw conclusions concerning hubs, routes and fleet until the new management is able to really catch up Varig's operations.

That's it, so why leave GIG empty now, especially when the fleet keeps changing. They must have to make a lot of ferry flights between GIG and GRU nowadays and they don't have money to spare to be moving the fleet empty around the country.


User currently offlineLipeGIG From Brazil, joined May 2005, 11416 posts, RR: 59
Reply 5, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 5309 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

My opinion:

1) Rio is the most strong base of customers RG has (as well as where fidelity to Varig is stronger due to the size of their operations in the past at GIG and the shuttle service Rio-SP)

2) Sao Paulo for Varig is a connections hub, if someone can prove to me something different i can change my mind:

a) RG in the near past runs flights from POA, CWB, IGU, CNF, BSB, GYN, SSA, REC, FOR, MAO, AJU, all to GRU allowing connections and feeding their international ops. GRU is not the main Sao Paulo airport and G3/JJ use to offer "discount" fares while CGH prices are even higher.
b) GIG has only: POA, CWB, VIX, SSA, CNF, BSB, SSA and REC. GIG is O&D for domestic flights (note that RG use to fly GIG-CNF 4x GIG-VIX 4x and GIG-BSB 8x, while only GRU-CNF 2x and GRU-BSB 2x just to feed the international flights)
c) Any RG employee would confirm that GIG-FRA is at least 65% O&D GIG while GRU-FRA is stronger on connections.
d) Every day GRU-GIG "shuttle" carry more than 1000 daily pax from Rio.

3) Cargo in Rio is not so strong as GRU and VCP and due to this the demand for cargo on the flights is higher than Sao Paulo (where a lot of cargo planes use to fly to US and Europe)

4) Rio is under served, São Paulo isn't !

5) Lets compare:

RG M11 FRA vs LH 744 FRA
RG 763 MIA vs JJ A332 / AA 772 / AA 763 MIA
RG 763 JFK vs JJ A332 / AA 772 / JL B744 JFK / CO 762 EWR
RG M11 CDG vs AF 77W / JJ A332 CDG
RG M11 LHR vs BA 744 / JJ A332 LHR
RG 733 EZE vs JJ A332-A320-F100 / AR 735 / G3 738
RG 733 SCL vs JJ A332 / LA A320/763 SCL
RG 733 MAO-BOG vs AV 763/752 BOG non stop
RG 733 VVI-LIM vs LA 763 / TA A320 non stop

* For me Sao Paulo customers will decide on Tam, AF, AA, and others (it's easy for them as they just need to go to GRU). Varig will remain strong on POA, MAO, SSA, REC... but they are weak nowadays due to the problems they face. Who expect RG selling F again ?

And why GIG ?

- Without RG, AF/IB/TP are not in conditions to take care of the non-stop demand to Europe.
- Their base of customers is really high (RG use to be 50% of GIG till april 2005)
- High demand for new foreign business of Rio corporations (Petrobras, Vale do Rio Doce, All other oil market, Shipyards..) and also The Pan American Games.
- Rio still receive close to 30% of all business trips to Brazil (but only 15% as intl pax at GIG). Sao Paulo get around 55% but GRU is almost 4x higher than GIG in terms of passengers.

Well, and just to let all know, i will be transferred to New York effective september with 6x trips/year to Rio. More one claiming for a JFK-GIG non stop service!

RG at GIG could be the king as the market is under served and willing for non-stop service to places like LHR/MXP/JFK/SCL/LIM/CCS with good fares. RG at GRU will be one more, and will need to charge lower fares to gain the market confidence again.

But it's only my opinion... RG seems that decided in favor of GRU, and also it's very clear: high demand for connections (low fares on trips like FOR-GRU-FRA), but the Sao Paulo O&D is on someone else hands (AF,AA,JJ....) and the profit will be hard to be obtained. F customers will only return in one year, may be two. C customers, it depends on each corporate (my company will pay me GIG-ATL-JFK, and in the past i use to fly GIG-JFK with RG!) but it takes some time also. Y customers are even more sensitive for past problems and will avoid flying RG during a long time.

NOTE: Even JJ will stop F class service on JFK/MIA/LHR routes. Only two A332 GE powered will keep First Class Service, just for CDG.

Felipe



New York + Rio de Janeiro = One of the best combinations !
User currently offlineAwysBSB From Brazil, joined Sep 2005, 561 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 5240 times:

In my opinion GIG should be the only RG`s international hub of Southeastern Brazil.
I realize Star members like UA and LH would not like to see RG making such a decision, but RG might also have not liked when those partners decided to give more focus on IAD and MUC, respectively.
The point is, those changes are the best way to improve operations.


User currently offlineJohnClipper From Hong Kong, joined Aug 2005, 835 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5185 times:

What I would like to know is when did things change (or what changed things) in Brazil for RG to swap GIG for GRU. I flew them JFK-GIG back in 1987 and GIG was king. All flights stopped first in GIG (if they continued to GRU). PA was doing the same thing. All flights for PA were routed through GIG except for a few times a week MIA-GRU or JFK-GRU flight. Was is a bilateral change? Was it economics? I know GRU is the business capital but did this just change "overnight"? Nowadays, only AA offers a daily GIG nonstop from MIA with a B767-300ER.

User currently offlineLipeGIG From Brazil, joined May 2005, 11416 posts, RR: 59
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5174 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting JohnClipper (Reply 7):

After GRU has been built, Infraero grant several incentives for airlines to divide flights between GIG and GRU. The problem is that Sao Paulo become even strong in terms of economy, and the government also accepted flights to main downtown airports, which produced a major concentration on Sao Paulo CGH. With the domestic flights going to CGH, and also the fact that some routes like BSB, CNF, VIX, CPQ was running out of SDU (downtown Rio) and not GIG, airlines start to drop GIG (due to the lack of domestic flights) in favor of GRU: Alitalia, Air Canada, Delta, Japan AirLines, South African, Continental, British, KLM, Lufthansa....
Now CGH+GRU are 35 million pax / year (15 million at least connections, 4 million from SDU and 3 million from GIG), and main routes are out of GRU where the bigger number of C+F customers (due to the high number of flights) depart.

AA will upgrade GIG to a 12x weekly (2x daily during summer) next year. DL also offers daily 767-300ER from ATL to GIG. CO although a good number of C customers from Rio due to the oil market (IAH-GRU-GIG), keep a stop at GRU, and UA also do the same on their IAD service.

Sad history but note, i'm not trying to say GRU is not important! We have one of the top 5 domestic markets in the world, seems other cities deserves more international services.

Felipe



New York + Rio de Janeiro = One of the best combinations !
User currently offlineSteeler83 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 9176 posts, RR: 18
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5174 times:

Quoting C010T3 (Thread starter):
The few routes that Varig is going to operate in the next weeks are flown out of GRU with the sole exception of GIG-EZE. That is a very strange development in Varig's strategy, given the fact that GIG is the airport in which Varig has the best structure: best lounge, most comfortable terminal, maintenance and so on, not to mention the headquarters near SDU.

Yeah, I would think that GIG would have trememdous O&D to support a hub operation, considering that it's a vacation destination, at least for us Americans it is anyway...



Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
User currently offlineStirling From Italy, joined Jun 2004, 3943 posts, RR: 22
Reply 10, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 21 hours ago) and read 5156 times:

Quoting JohnClipper (Reply 7):
PA was doing the same thing. All flights for PA were routed through GIG except for a few times a week MIA-GRU or JFK-GRU

Hell, PanAm at one point served arounf 27 destinations from Rio.
And close to that same number from MAO.
About half that from SAO.

And their international flights didn't just stop off in other Latin America countries, or go nonstop to the USA.....PA also had a flight SAO-RIO-REC-DKR-LIS-PAR-FRA. Another variation of that branched off, going LIS-NCE-GVA-MUC.



Delete this User
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32596 posts, RR: 72
Reply 11, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 5142 times:

Quoting JohnClipper (Reply 7):
Nowadays, only AA offers a daily GIG nonstop from MIA with a B767-300ER.

It will be 2x daily, year-round eff. 01Nov06.



a.
User currently offlineLipeGIG From Brazil, joined May 2005, 11416 posts, RR: 59
Reply 12, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 5036 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 11):
Quoting JohnClipper (Reply 7):
Nowadays, only AA offers a daily GIG nonstop from MIA with a B767-300ER.

It will be 2x daily, year-round eff. 01Nov06.

First week of April, 2007
American Airlines
AA 2980 Rio De Janeiro Int'l (GIG), Rio De Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
Terminal 1 22:55
Miami Int'l (MIA), Miami, Florida, USA 06:19+1 day(s)
Non-stop
763 8h24min Daily except Wednesday
Saturday

Mark, AA will change this ?

Felipe



New York + Rio de Janeiro = One of the best combinations !
User currently offlineGeorgiabill From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 577 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 5027 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Curious does anyone know how many aircraft the new RG will be flying? How many will be widebodies? Any chance of seeing airbus in the fleet or will it remain only a boeing operator?

User currently offlineLipeGIG From Brazil, joined May 2005, 11416 posts, RR: 59
Reply 14, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 5012 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting Georgiabill (Reply 13):
Curious does anyone know how many aircraft the new RG will be flying? How many will be widebodies? Any chance of seeing airbus in the fleet or will it remain only a boeing operator?

Georgia, everything is possible nowadays, they are negotiating with Boeing (owner of 5 M11 leased to Varig) and also some lessors (ILFC, Bristol, Sojitz, GATX and others) to keep more planes, but the results are not so clear. Varig need 13 widebodies, but only in 2 weeks we can get a better picture of such negotiations.
Airbus could be an option if they need new aircrafts, but IMO their main problem is the past due leasing, although it's not "new" Varig commitment, the lessors required the payment in order to keep the fleet under RG tail (and i doubt a new lessor will accept to lease more planes without strong guarantees).

Felipe



New York + Rio de Janeiro = One of the best combinations !
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8938 posts, RR: 40
Reply 15, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 4940 times:

Quoting LipeGIG (Reply 5):
Well, and just to let all know, i will be transferred to New York effective september with 6x trips/year to Rio. More one claiming for a JFK-GIG non stop service!

Congratulations my friend!!

Quoting LipeGIG (Reply 5):
1) Rio is the most strong base of customers RG has (as well as where fidelity to Varig is stronger due to the size of their operations in the past at GIG and the shuttle service Rio-SP)

I agree with Rio. My intentions with my post were not to ignore Rio, but as you said yourself; GRU is not unimportant. I think RG should have strong focus in Rio, especially at first adn to main inernational destinations, but I think Varig should still have their hub at GRU because it is still the largest market.

Also as you said: Varig used to be very strong at POA, REC, SSA and MAO- which IMO are excellent regional-hubs for international flights outside of GRU/GIG.

Cheers



"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlineBillReid From Netherlands, joined Jun 2006, 981 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 4939 times:

Atlantis.
Way down below the ocean.



Some people don't get it. Business is about making MONEY!
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8938 posts, RR: 40
Reply 17, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 4923 times:

Quoting BillReid (Reply 16):
Atlantis.
Way down below the ocean.

They could code-share with UA and US (already star alliance partners) but would face strong competition from DL and NW.

 Yeah sure



"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Best Plane For The Job posted Mon Jan 9 2006 17:00:53 by Jshackelford
A Thread For Predictions For The New Year posted Sat Dec 31 2005 21:59:58 by AirFrnt
Top 5 Slogans For The New US Airways posted Mon May 23 2005 03:05:14 by PSAjet17
New Year's Resolution For The Airlines? posted Mon Jan 2 2006 11:07:18 by EK156
Best Airports In The US For Spotting posted Fri Nov 11 2005 23:28:18 by DLX737200
Best Time Of The Year For Aviation! posted Mon Oct 17 2005 06:27:49 by Squirrel83
The Best Route For EWR-TAB? posted Tue Apr 5 2005 05:11:04 by Cory6188
Just For Fun Lets Make Up The New MX/AM posted Thu Jan 27 2005 16:30:43 by Anthsaun
What Is The Best Alliance For You? posted Fri Aug 20 2004 01:24:09 by Fokker50
Best Route Out Of Any Airline Hub In The U.S posted Tue Aug 10 2004 23:58:01 by Bushcheney2004