http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/1436910/ |
| Topic: PAN American - The New Pan Am Username: Alitalia7e7 Posted 2004-03-04 04:57:38 and read 3420 times. Does anyone know if the new Pan Am is still flying? If they are will this airline expand to be one of the great airlines it used to be? It would be great if one of the airlines like JetBlue etc would buy the Pan Am name and grow the airline to its full potential. |
| Topic: RE: PAN American - The New Pan Am Username: MSYtristar Posted 2004-03-04 05:07:50 and read 3346 times. As of 1984, Pan Am flew nonstop from Sydney to: AKL, LAX, and MEL with 747 and 747SP equipment. Generally, three weekly nonstops to each destination. Also, a weekly 747 nonstop to HNL was offered. |
| Topic: RE: PAN American - The New Pan Am Username: Freshlove1 Posted 2004-03-04 05:10:32 and read 3321 times. The new Pan Am is horrible, it will never be as big or as good as the old Pan Am, its a shame that they are using the name.The Pan Am name should be retired and no longer used |
| Topic: RE: PAN American - The New Pan Am Username: Cancidas Posted 2004-03-04 05:13:03 and read 3295 times. are they flying under the "clipper" callsign? |
| Topic: RE: PAN American - The New Pan Am Username: BA747400 Posted 2004-03-04 06:22:40 and read 3189 times. Back in the 90's a company purchased the logo and name from the then bankrupt Pan AM in court. With that, the name was carried on, but nothing else. (maybe a plane or 2) The new PanAM is based out of PSM with another HQ in Sanford, FL. They have one hanger and fly 727's along with a few other small aircraft, off the top of my head I cant think of what they are. They are operated by Boston-Maine airways and fly to Baltimore, Sanford, san Juan, Santo Domingo, Puta Cana, myrtle beach, St. John, Nantucket, Martha's Vineyard, Groton CT, white planes NY, and Manchester NH. They seem to be doing quite well as they are adding new flights quite often. I think they started service to Chicago a few years back, but I guess it didn't go too well. The thing that cracks me up the most is that they fly a 727-200 from PSM to MHT a couple times a day! I can understand why they do this: maintenance, MHT is rather big, etc..... But the best part is that the tickets for that segment run at 75 USD per person! ITS A 15 MIN. FLIGHT! HA! |
| Topic: RE: PAN American - The New Pan Am Username: PA34plt Posted 2004-03-04 06:24:54 and read 3168 times. Yes, they are flying the Clipper call sign. Yes they are horrible. I have heard horror stories from some fellow pilots there and at Boston-Maine airways. |
| Topic: RE: PAN American - The New Pan Am Username: Freshlove1 Posted 2004-03-04 06:31:01 and read 3133 times. Boston-Maine Airlines I believe flys the J31 aircraft to those cities |
| Topic: RE: PAN American - The New Pan Am Username: MxCtrlr Posted 2004-03-04 06:59:58 and read 3076 times. Its been mentioned here before however, not for a while so, since I have the dubious distinction of working for ALL 3 incarnations of Pan Am, here goes the saga... |
| Topic: RE: PAN American - The New Pan Am Username: Panamair Posted 2004-03-04 11:45:01 and read 2975 times. Today's Pan Am has nothing in common with the late great original. It is privately held by a railroad company (Guilford Transportation) with deep pockets and has a knack for dropping routes as quickly as they start them although lately they seemed to have settled on a few that make money (with the 727s, they fly PSM-SFB-SJU/BQN, and MHT-MYR-SFB) while the J31s operated by Boston-Maine serve many other locations in the Northeast and in the Carribean (see www.flypanam.com). |
| Topic: RE: PAN American - The New Pan Am Username: FlyingDoctorWu Posted 2004-03-05 20:46:59 and read 2656 times. It looks like the 727 has been equipped with winglet's.. pretty cool. does anyone know of other 727's wtih winglets that are in commercial service? I think Trump's has them.... |
| Topic: RE: PAN American - The New Pan Am Username: GD727 Posted 2004-03-05 21:41:23 and read 2547 times. Um, how exactley is the new Pan Am terrible? I've never flown them before and have tickets on them from MHT-SFB next month. Do I have anything to be worried about? Btw, does anyone know how their seating works? |
| Topic: RE: PAN American - The New Pan Am Username: IflyORL Posted 2004-03-05 21:51:08 and read 2458 times. Pan Am isn't really that bad. I'm assuming that most people are saying that without personal knowledge. It is just your basic everyday service. You show up check in and rather than a seat number you get a passenger number. You board by passenger number and pick the seat you want. There are no frills. Just basic service. No doubt it is not the Pan Am of old, but they tickets are cheap and if your in a pinch its not too bad to fly. |
| Topic: RE: PAN American - The New Pan Am Username: GD727 Posted 2004-03-05 21:57:14 and read 2411 times. IflyORL: So their seating is like WN's? |
| Topic: RE: PAN American - The New Pan Am Username: Theiler Posted 2004-03-05 23:36:44 and read 2256 times. They've actually improved quite a bit in the last year. Their route structure has been largely stable, and their ontime performance has improved substantially as a result of the additional equipment (UAL 72's). |
| Topic: RE: PAN American - The New Pan Am Username: MxCtrlr Posted 2004-03-06 00:29:17 and read 2170 times. FlyingDoctorWu, |
| Topic: RE: PAN American - The New Pan Am Username: Pilottim747 Posted 2004-03-06 06:46:21 and read 1997 times. Looks like Pan Am flies two aircraft with the winglets, N362PA and N364PA. I can't say anything about their service, but I love that they've kept the old livery. Nothing like seeing that plane, especially in person. We were lucky enough to get a Pan Am charter into GFK last December. Wow that plane took my breath away! ![]() Photo © Timothy Hannan pilottim747 |
Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved. |