http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/1560414/ |
| Topic: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: Henpol747 Posted 2004-05-12 02:09:04 and read 3755 times.
|
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: Solnabo Posted 2004-05-12 02:19:33 and read 3673 times. As an A-busfan I would really really love to see this beauty in Mexicana c/s.. |
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: Mx330 Posted 2004-05-12 02:25:42 and read 3623 times. I pray more fot a 777 than an A330, even though I have certain nickname....hmm what was I thinking??? |
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: Soaringadi Posted 2004-05-12 02:29:46 and read 3571 times. Why not...... |
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: Fly2hmo Posted 2004-05-12 02:47:12 and read 3399 times. Weren't they looking at A340s? Or I misunderstood other threads related to this? That's a well done fake by the way. |
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: Cx340 Posted 2004-05-12 03:13:46 and read 3284 times. MX330, |
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: EddieDude Posted 2004-05-12 03:39:24 and read 3204 times. Well, yes, both A330's and A340's have been the subject of a lot of speculation lately. The same with the routes in which they would be used: from JFK to AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA to PVG. I think MX will go for Airbus widebodies (the rumors of a second 763ER joining the fleet notwithstanding) and that an official statement -at least about their plans- will be issued before the end of the year. |
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: Eduardo Lepe Posted 2004-05-12 03:40:00 and read 3200 times. MX Will not go for T7. As you know most part of MX fleet is Airbus. Perhaps we could see A330. I do not think we could have A340, but anyway it sound interesting:D. |
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: NAVEGA Posted 2004-05-12 03:57:00 and read 3060 times. Sooner than you all think. But an A340 with MX livery |
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: S.p.a.s. Posted 2004-05-12 04:03:02 and read 3002 times. CX340, |
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: EddieDude Posted 2004-05-12 04:09:43 and read 2929 times. NAVEGA, buddy, spill the beans! |
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: Mx330 Posted 2004-05-12 04:51:42 and read 2760 times. Navega, sources? |
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: Bobs89irocz Posted 2004-05-12 04:57:51 and read 2725 times. That MX A332 would be a NICE looking airplane....even though i would love to see them go Boeing i have to admite id go out of my way to see that A332. As well as the AM 777. |
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: Mx330 Posted 2004-05-12 05:02:08 and read 2711 times. Cx340: |
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: EddieDude Posted 2004-05-12 05:30:07 and read 2593 times. Well, there were rumors a few days ago that a second 763ER (not coming from SK) was joining the MX fleet. The rumors coincided with the announcement that MX would add one more flight to EZE in order to have 5 weekly flights. In the end, I do not recall whether it was just a rumor and the plane was in the hangar just for maintenance for the benefit of somebody else, or if the plane was indeed joining the fleet. In any case, unless something funny happens, I think MX will end up getting widebody Airbuses. A separate thread (I think it is the "Mexico and China" thread) has a picture of a 747 in MX livery. Just F.Y.I. |
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: AA737-823 Posted 2004-05-12 06:31:33 and read 2506 times. Ugh on the 333- at least put Pratts on it! |
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: Marcolic Posted 2004-05-12 06:53:19 and read 2437 times. Mexico and Mexicana are both written with "x", thanks |
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: Roberta Posted 2004-05-13 23:08:45 and read 2120 times. Would the A340 not be more suitable given that quads perform better at hot and high airports? |
| Topic: RE: MX: Will This Pic Ever Be Possible? Username: EddieDude Posted 2004-05-14 05:38:45 and read 1881 times. I'm no engineer and my understanding of aeronautics is a hair above zero, but I would say that if MX is only thinking of widebody service to, say, JFK, LHR and MAD, then the A330 would be the way to go. If MX is considering, however, FRa and destinations in Asia, then the A340 would be more suitable (even an A345 might have to make a refueling stop on its way from MEx to an Asian city... I dunno if a 772LR could do, for example MEx-HKG non-stop). |
Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved. |