Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/2827957/

Topic: SIA Would Not Launch Ultra Long-Haul Flights Today
Username: UALMMFlyer
Posted 2006-06-16 03:35:56 and read 4128 times.

Read the following short news today...

Quote:

Intelligence
SIA Would Not Launch Ultra Long-Haul Flights Today
Staff
70 words
12 June 2006
Aviation Daily
1
Volume 364, Number 50
English
(c) 2006 McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Given a choice, Singapore Airlines would not launch ultra-long-haul flights today, CEO C. S. Chew told The DAILY. Its Singapore-Los Angeles nonstop service was profitable at the end of 2004, Chew said, but turned negative with the rising fuel costs. SIA operates daily Airbus A340-500 services to Los Angeles and New York with five aircraft.



Does this mean:

1. SQ may cancel its ULR flights and get rid of its 345 and also not considering 772LR, or
2. A345 is not efficient and not able to carry a full load, or
3. Is it just SIN-LAX-SIN not profitable as article seems to indicate?

Topic: RE: SIA Would Not Launch Ultra Long-Haul Flights Today
Username: PolymerPlane
Posted 2006-06-16 04:18:13 and read 4005 times.

I think 772LR would probably profitable on the run. It should be able to carry 300 pax, much more than the A345 and 11 tons of cargo against almost nothing on A345, on top of the fuel burn advantage.

I think 8 abreast 777 would be as comfortable as the current 7 abreast 345.

Cheers,
PP

Topic: RE: SIA Would Not Launch Ultra Long-Haul Flights Today
Username: Zvezda
Posted 2006-06-16 04:29:43 and read 3937 times.

The B787-9 would be even more profitable, but we'll have to see about payload/range performance for EWR-SIN. SFO/LAX-SIN should be fine.


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/