Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/2848328/

Topic: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Flying Belgian
Posted 2006-06-27 17:13:54 and read 9134 times.

Hi !

That's what I've read in the latest Airliner World issue. In an article dedicated to the Russian Sibir/S7, they said the latter found an agreement with GECAS to lease ten A319s sourced out from NW.

So my question is why is NW getting rid of such new airplanes when they still have to replace their classic fuel burner aka DC9-51 ??


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mark Kopczak
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andrei Pechenkin



Any hints from the insiders  Wink ?


FB.

[Edited 2006-06-27 17:19:40]

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Scouseflyer
Posted 2006-06-27 17:18:11 and read 9114 times.

Cos they own the DC9s and the A319s are on lease so it is cheaper to terminate a lease rather than try and sell a plane that wouldn't have many takers?

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Flypdx
Posted 2006-06-27 17:23:47 and read 9091 times.

1) Do a search.
2) In case you don't want to, it is because of lease costs on the newer aircraft. On the DC9s they aren't paying to lease them. Just for fuel and other expenses. With the airbus aircraft as well as some other aircraft they have lease costs as well as fuel and other expenses. When it comes down to it, it must be cheaper to keep an older aircraft that may have higher fuel costs than to keep an aircraft on lease with lower fuel costs. Especially if the routes do not require the range of an A319.

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: United787
Posted 2006-06-27 17:32:26 and read 9024 times.

This will push the average NW aircraft age down even farther. I thought I remember it being about 19 years old.

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: MaxQ2351
Posted 2006-06-27 17:40:07 and read 8955 times.

Northwest also has two subfleets of both the A-320 and A-319. In the case of they -319, they have the A-319/113 and A-319/114, the difference being the 114 has slightly uprated motors. It is my understanding that NWA has been trying to eliminate the 113 subfleet in favor of maintaining just the 114 subfleet.

In the case of NWA's A-320's, they have the A-320/211 and A-320/212. They have a decent number of 211's, so I don't think there are any plans to terminate their leases......anytime soon at least.

-Max

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Dutchjet
Posted 2006-06-27 18:20:31 and read 8807 times.

As pointed out, the A319s are leased and the leasing costs can be high - NW probably could not negotiate the lease price down on this group of A319s and thus the leases were terminated pursuant to NW's bankrputcy and will go to a new operator.

Also keep in mind that NW is downsizing its operation and it will need less aircraft - atleast initially - to go forward as it works its way out of bankruptcy. For example, it could be that many of the services once flown with A319s will now be operated by Compass with smaller jets.

Its all about money and costs.

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: MD90fan
Posted 2006-06-27 19:01:12 and read 8675 times.

Hello, Flying Belgian  Smile

The ten NW A319s going to S7 are :N303NB, N304NB, N305NB, N306NB, N307NB, N308NB, N309NB, N311NB N312NB and N310NB. Some are already at MST for repainting as I speak.

These birds were stored at Marana after the whole BK stuff last year.

http://www.kommersant.com/page.asp?idr=500&id=666064

The article says the birds of are 1999 build and costed 23 million bucks for S7

Best Regards.
MD90fan  wave 

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Flying Belgian
Posted 2006-06-27 19:40:35 and read 8537 times.

Quoting MD90fan (Reply 6):
Hello, Flying Belgian

The ten NW A319s going to S7 are :N303NB, N304NB, N305NB, N306NB, N307NB, N308NB, N309NB, N311NB N312NB and N310NB. Some are already at MST for repainting as I speak.

These birds were stored at Marana after the whole BK stuff last year.

http://www.kommersant.com/page.asp?idr=500&id=666064

The article says the birds of are 1999 build and costed 23 million bucks for S7

Best Regards.
MD90fan

Many thx MD90fan !!!

FB.

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Burnsie28
Posted 2006-06-28 02:32:33 and read 8166 times.

Quoting Dutchjet (Reply 5):
As pointed out, the A319s are leased and the leasing costs can be high

Somewhat true, only two A319's are leased.
As of the end of December, which should have been after the fate of the 10 aircraft, NW now owns 64 of the A319's and leases just two, i believe they used to lease 12 319's.

As for the A320's they own 43 of them and lease 32 of them. All the DC-9's are owned, They used to have four leased DC-9's.

They are still going to take delivery of the last 5 A319's on order and 2 A320's on order.

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Ruudonline
Posted 2006-06-28 10:04:01 and read 7765 times.

The busses will be painted at MST.

Check this link for pictures:

http://www.mst-aviation.nl/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4388

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: FlyGuyClt
Posted 2006-06-28 12:53:27 and read 7162 times.

Quoting United787 (Reply 3):
This will push the average NW aircraft age down even farther. I thought I remember it being about 19 years old.



Stephen

Over 30 DC9's have been parked. I don't think 10 A319's is going to make a difference in a bad way on that note.

Safe Flying  Smile

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Jano
Posted 2006-06-28 13:56:04 and read 6831 times.

Quoting United787 (Reply 3):
This will push the average NW aircraft age down even farther. I thought I remember it being about 19 years old.

Let's not forget that NWA took delivery of 18 A330s since summer 2003. There are 14 more still to be delivered.

All DC10s are to be withdrawn from service by Jan 2007.

DC9s are being withdrawn from the service at about 30 per year. Right now there are 115 of them. I remember times some 2 years sago when NWA had more than 160 of these.

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Scouseflyer
Posted 2006-06-28 14:05:31 and read 6764 times.

Quoting Jano (Reply 11):
DC9s are being withdrawn from the service at about 30 per year. Right now there are 115 of them. I remember times some 2 years sago when NWA had more than 160 of these.

So are the newer A319/20s coming on stream to replace these?

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Jano
Posted 2006-06-28 14:11:37 and read 6719 times.

Quoting Scouseflyer (Reply 12):
Quoting Jano (Reply 11):
DC9s are being withdrawn from the service at about 30 per year. Right now there are 115 of them. I remember times some 2 years sago when NWA had more than 160 of these.

So are the newer A319/20s coming on stream to replace these

From what I understand by reading posts here by people, who I believe are related to NWA, DC9s are to be replaced by either E170/175 + E190/195 or CRJ700/900. Some of these would be flown by Compass and some by NWA.

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Okees
Posted 2006-06-28 16:02:33 and read 6018 times.

wow.. when i first read the title of this thread i thought it was "how to get rid of ten A319s?" DOH!

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Thering
Posted 2006-06-28 16:21:48 and read 5869 times.

Quoting Flying Belgian (Thread starter):
So my question is why is NW getting rid of such new airplanes when they still have to replace their classic fuel burner aka DC9-51 ??

They own their DC-9 and lease the A319, so it's much cheaper to get rid of the A319!

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Flydreamliner
Posted 2006-06-28 16:30:42 and read 5804 times.

Quoting Jano (Reply 13):
From what I understand by reading posts here by people, who I believe are related to NWA, DC9s are to be replaced by either E170/175 + E190/195 or CRJ700/900. Some of these would be flown by Compass and some by NWA.

That is the plan coming out of NW. They won't be able to buy anything till they exit bankruptcy though. They have more domestic capacity than they need, and they're cutting it. The DC-9s are still cheaper overall to fly since they are paid off. Also, the A319's are worth more money - they can get something by terminating their leases and leasing out the ones they own, or selling them off - anything to pay for their planned international expansion to asia - which is the cornerstone of their plan for profitability. With their NRT hub, they are poised, and have every intention to become the number one American carrier to asia in a big way - coupled with their European expansion plans and thier close relationship with KLM/AF. The A333s will be the backbone of their european expansion, replacing all the DC10s and adding new capacities, their A332 and 787 will be the backbone of their asian expansion. All of this costs money - and their domestic routes are not terribly successful, so at this point, NW's desperate leadership is getting money out of wherever they can.

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Boeingguy1
Posted 2006-06-28 16:36:41 and read 5758 times.

Quoting Thering (Reply 15):
They own their DC-9 and lease the A319, so it's much cheaper to get rid of the A319!

Thank you for this short burst of wisdom, which obviously wasnt answered in the 6+ posts above you.

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: M404
Posted 2006-06-28 22:06:04 and read 5250 times.

Just wondering if any of the lease agreements being renegotiated allow for acft leased to NWA to be in turned leased to a third party from NWA? Of course this would have to be approved by the original lessor and questions of why not just return and re-lease arise but am curious if, for instance, some short term leases could be done that way for equipment they wanted back after BK reorganization.

[Edited 2006-06-28 22:10:27]

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Breiz
Posted 2006-06-28 23:45:00 and read 5152 times.

Quoting Burnsie28 (Reply 8):
Somewhat true, only two A319's are leased.

Let's be precise about it: none of the A319 of Northwest are leased in the way that they are rented from a leasing company (ILFC, GECAS,...).
Airlines do like you and me (at least me), they borrow money from banks to buy airliners. Until fully paid, the ac remain kind of the bank's property (not exactly, I know).
So the A319s in question were financed by First Security Bank which sold them (the debt) to Wells Fargo Bank Northwest NA, then State Street Bank which in turn, put them up for sale by auction (maybe some of you saw the auction advertisement in Flight International Feb. 28th, 2006).
And Sibir purchased them.
Sibir was initially interested by getting from GECAS 10 A319s returned by United.

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: 727LOVER
Posted 2006-06-29 00:20:24 and read 5100 times.

Well, nobody's asked, so I'll ask. Why the greenish 733?  Confused

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: CX flyboy
Posted 2006-06-29 04:28:30 and read 4972 times.

Seeing there isn't a photo of this in the green colours on this website, here it is from the 'other' one:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=5759475

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Isitsafenow
Posted 2006-06-29 05:02:04 and read 4913 times.

Quoting United787 (Reply 3):
This will push the average NW aircraft age down even farther. I thought I remember it being about 19 years old.

So? I was on four of their DC 9's the last two days. You know, they fly
real good. I kinda like them, too.
safe

[Edited 2006-06-29 05:05:25]

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: TL925
Posted 2006-06-29 09:15:45 and read 4779 times.

Quoting 727LOVER (Reply 20):
Let's be precise about it: none of the A319 of Northwest are leased in the way that they are rented from a leasing company (ILFC, GECAS,...).
Airlines do like you and me (at least me), they borrow money from banks to buy airliners. Until fully paid, the ac remain kind of the bank's property (not exactly, I know).
So the A319s in question were financed by First Security Bank which sold them (the debt) to Wells Fargo Bank Northwest NA, then State Street Bank which in turn, put them up for sale by auction (maybe some of you saw the auction advertisement in Flight International Feb. 28th, 2006).
And Sibir purchased them.
Sibir was initially interested by getting from GECAS 10 A319s returned by United.

Looking at NWA's A319 fleet, they currently have 5 x A319's that are on operating lease with Q Aviation. All were done via a Sale and Leaseback in late 2005. Otherwise, the remaining part of NWA's A319 fleet are on NWA's books.

You are correct in explaining there are two types of leases that are common in aircraft finance. There is a Finance Lease and an Operating Lease.

Finance Lease -
The aircraft is financed by a bank, and the aircraft are owned by a SPC (either controlled by a bank or an orhpan vehicle). The airline makes lease payments (equal to loan repayment) and at the end of a period (usually 10-12 years) after the loan is repaid the airline gets to buy the aircraft at a nominal purchase price. While the legal ownership is with the SPC (makes it easier to repossess in a default), the economic and accounting ownership is with the airline (i.e. the aircraft is on the airline's balance sheet)

Operating Lease -
Ownership of the aircraft is with an Operating Lessor (e.g. ILFA, GECAS, Q Aviation) and the airline makes lease payments for a duration of the lease. At lease expiry the aircraft is returned to the Operating Lessor who is free to remarket the aircraft for the next user. In this case, the aircraft is not owned by the airline but rather the Operating Lessor and accounting wise the aircraft are off-balance sheet.

While other structures exist, these are the two most common ways that airlines can finance aircraft.

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Breiz
Posted 2006-06-29 17:34:01 and read 4669 times.

Quoting TL925 (Reply 23):
they currently have 5 x A319's that are on operating lease with Q Aviation.

Interesting, TL925.
Can you indicate which ones?
Thanks in advance.

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Burnsie28
Posted 2006-06-30 01:53:41 and read 4549 times.

Quoting Flydreamliner (Reply 16):
They won't be able to buy anything till they exit bankruptcy though.

Wrong, just because they are in bk, doesnt mean anything, if its something that they can use to become profitable, it will be allowed.

Quoting Flydreamliner (Reply 16):
They have more domestic capacity than they need, and they're cutting it.

Wrong again, they are re-expanding and will be adding many of the 757's that were sent to the desert, and will be recalling pilots around the late part of this year, most likely they will be hiring next year.

Quoting Flydreamliner (Reply 16):
With their NRT hub, they are poised, and have every intention to become the number one American carrier to asia in a big way

Already there, NW is the largest US airline in Asia and second largest in Japan behind only ANA.

[Edited 2006-06-30 01:54:25]

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: Nwafflyer
Posted 2006-06-30 02:15:38 and read 4523 times.

I've heard, from several pilots - NW, Mesaba and Pinnacle, that the DC-9, even though paid for, is more expensive to operate than the Airbus 319/320

Any airline economists out there?

Topic: RE: NW To Get Rid Of Ten A319s?
Username: TL925
Posted 2006-06-30 03:13:16 and read 4486 times.

Quoting Burnsie28 (Reply 25):
Interesting, TL925.
Can you indicate which ones?
Thanks in advance.

N371NB, MSN 2095
N372NB, MSN 2369
N373NB, MSN 2373
N374NB, MSN 2464
N375NB, MSN 2474


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/