Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/2991937/

Topic: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: 747400sp
Posted 2006-09-16 22:03:45 and read 13808 times.

I was reading a post on the Concorde cabin crew, and it was stated that the BA cabin crew would come off their 737 and 757. Now I would think that the cabin crew from a 747 or 777 would have the seniority to work on the Concorde. Is the reason BA use 737 and 757 crew, is due to the shorter working hour on the Concorde, witch is around the same time a 737 or 757 F/A would work. To sum it up is it true that the Concorde had a 737 and 757 cabin crew and if yes why?

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: Dutchjet
Posted 2006-09-16 22:09:21 and read 13783 times.

Yes, I do remember reading that Concorde crews were a dedicated group from BA's European division, not from longhaul operations.........now if I could only remember the logic??

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: N766UA
Posted 2006-09-16 22:11:53 and read 13783 times.

Quoting Dutchjet (Reply 1):
now if I could only remember the logic??

Well, it is only a 3 hr. flight. Much more suitable to domestic cabin crews than int'l ones. Plus it only held 100 pax, so that's more suited to a smaller domestic-sized crew, too. It's less of a jump for them, I'd say.

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: Dutchjet
Posted 2006-09-16 22:14:29 and read 13754 times.

Quoting N766UA (Reply 2):

Well, it is only a 3 hr. flight. Much more suitable to domestic cabin crews than int'l ones. Plus it only held 100 pax, so that's more suited to a smaller domestic-sized crew, too. It's less of a jump for them, I'd say.

Of course what you say makes sense, but there was a very specific reason aside from your points that resulted in the operation of the Concorde flights be the European crews.....I am working on it.

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: EGTESkyGod
Posted 2006-09-17 00:09:04 and read 13545 times.

I'd not heard this before but I suppose it makes sense really.

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: A340600
Posted 2006-09-17 00:29:22 and read 13490 times.

BA crew were drawn at random to work on concorde and there was a maximum time before you moved back onto the sub-sonic fleet. It was considered the ultimate dream of BA cabin crew,

Sam

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: BAStew
Posted 2006-09-17 01:16:53 and read 13402 times.

Yes, transfers between fleets (eg from LHR short-haul to LHR long-haul) is generally done strictly by seniority. There are no interviews or exams to take before changing fleets, your sickness or punctuality is not taken into account (as is with internal transfers at bmi!). When your number comes up you are offered the transfer, pure and simple.

Concorde was the one exception. You had to apply and attend an interview.

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: Carduelis
Posted 2006-09-17 02:03:34 and read 13302 times.

To relate to the thread title - yes, a couple of days after my last Concorde flight in 1986, I actually met two of the cabin crew on a London to Manchester 737 flight! They also recognised me, as the Concorde flight had been a day return LHR JFK LHR to celebrate my 50th anniversary of my birthday, and needless to say, quite an occasion!

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: AR385
Posted 2006-09-17 08:45:13 and read 12151 times.

I belive that in the case of Air France they would rotate. They would have a dedicated Cabin Crew staff for Concorde, but these crews would fly on Concorde for a month, then on European short hauls the next, then back in the Concorde for another month etc.

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: FlySSC
Posted 2006-09-17 09:36:58 and read 11865 times.

Quoting AR385 (Reply 8):
I belive that in the case of Air France they would rotate. They would have a dedicated Cabin Crew staff for Concorde, but these crews would fly on Concorde for a month, then on European short hauls the next, then back in the Concorde for another month etc.

 no 

Air France Concorde Cabin Crew were Long Haul crews, belonging to the AME ("Americas") Division.

We were usually flying alternately 2 months in a row on Concorde only, then one or two months on the "regular" Long Haul network.
When flying Concorde, we used to have 5 flights* CDG-JFK-CDG a month (or 11 flights on 2 months) + One or Two "reserves" at CDG only for the Concorde flight, and sometimes 1 or 2 Charter "Loops" CDG-CDG. That was a typical monthly planning. It could be a little different of course when we were operating special flights, charters etc ...

* 1 flight =
Day 1 : CDG.11:00AM ---> JFK.08:45AM AF002
Day 2 : JFK.08:45AM ---> CDG.05:45 PM AF001

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Cre
Username: AirWillie6475
Posted 2006-09-17 09:46:33 and read 11786 times.

In guess this thread is about FAs but I can add something about pilots. This topic was discussed in an airline magazine here in the states. Believe it or not the Concord was a JUNIOR aircraft, meaning not many pilots wanted to fly it. It paid very little flight time and a lot of effort goes into the flights. Most pilots stuck to the other aircraft in the fleet. Concord pilots were usually the diehard aviation junkies who didn't really care about pay or schedules. I had no idea, I thought concord pilots were very senior pilots with decades of experience.

[Edited 2006-09-17 09:53:37]

[Edited 2006-09-17 09:56:55]

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: RB211LTN
Posted 2006-09-17 09:52:50 and read 11747 times.

I'm former BA crew so I can give you the authoritative answer. Short haul crew were all checked on the 757 and 767 plus either the A320 or the 737, making a total of 3 aircraft (the maximum allowed by the CAA). Concorde crew were checked on the 757 and 767 in addition to Concorde. They flew on Concorde once or twice a month and did the rest of their trips on the 757 and 767. Whereas we used to get loads of overnight stops, they had none because it was decreed that their trips to JFK, BGI and other charter destinations were so lucrative that they had to forego the right to European overnights. The allowances on short haul were generous and we earned far more than the Concorde crew. In addition, Concorde is hot, noisy and hard work from a crew perspective. It was a high price to pay for the glamour of suspersonic flight.

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: EGTESkyGod
Posted 2006-09-17 10:22:10 and read 11550 times.

Quoting AirWillie6475 (Reply 10):
Believe it or not the Concord was a JUNIOR aircraft, meaning not many pilots wanted to fly it. It paid very little flight time and a lot of effort goes into the flights. Most pilots stuck to the other aircraft in the fleet. Concord pilots were usually the diehard aviation junkies who didn't really care about pay or schedules. I had no idea, I thought concord pilots were very senior pilots with decades of experience.

Are you serious?! No offence, but I do not believe that for a second. One of our instructors used to work for BA, and he said he knew pilots on 747s, VC10s, and all sorts of other aircraft and they would have given anything to fly Concorde (Notice the "E" and the lack of the word "the" by the way). Concorde pilots were very well paid, not sure of exact figures, but they were well paid.

I also know someone from my old job who flies 747s for BA, and when she was still flying, he said he'd give anything to fly Concorde. He knew one of the Concorde pilots, and he was flying Concorde into Exeter in 1999, and he arranged for her to fly over his (and my) home town, coincedentally during my first match as cricket captain, and also coincedently it was Concorde G-BOAC.

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: Jat74l
Posted 2006-09-17 11:51:42 and read 10928 times.

Concorde Chief Pilot Capt Mike Bannister's correct title was actually Chief Pilot - BA Shorthaul Fleet.

Regards

John

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: Babybus
Posted 2006-09-17 13:21:44 and read 10335 times.

I remember seeing a programme on tv where a Concorde co-pilot said that he couldn't become a Concorde captain straight-off but had to be a 757 or 767 captain first and then apply to become a Concorde captain.

I remember it as it seemed odd to have so much experience of an advanced aircraft only to gain experience on a slower, less technical one.

I also read that Concorde captains didn't make as much money as other captains. It was seen as an honour to fly it, they weren't flying that long per sector, and their per diems were smaller.

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: Lee
Posted 2006-09-17 16:04:35 and read 9174 times.

Did the higher levels of radiation affect how many concorde flights crew could do ?

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: MCOflyer
Posted 2006-09-17 16:48:59 and read 8785 times.

Quoting Jat74l (Reply 13):
Concorde Chief Pilot Capt Mike Bannister's correct title was actually Chief Pilot - BA Shorthaul Fleet.

Agreed, I remember seing that on a discovery channel special.

MCOflyer

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: David L
Posted 2006-09-17 18:33:34 and read 7890 times.

Quoting Lee (Reply 15):
Did the higher levels of radiation affect how many concorde flights crew could do ?

Higher levels of radiation but less exposure time. I believe it just about evened out in comparison with a 747 crew on the same route.

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: Bellerophon
Posted 2006-09-17 19:45:39 and read 7165 times.

EGTESkyGod

When you asked AirWillie6475:

...Are you serious?!...

I believe he is.


...No offence, but I do not believe that for a second...

Your privilege, but he is correct.


...One of our instructors used to work for BA, and he said he knew pilots on 747s, VC10s, and all sorts of other aircraft and they would have given anything to fly Concorde...

I'm sure he did know such pilots, there were many of them. However they were not in the majority. Most pilots with sufficient seniority for Concorde did not bid for her. The year I got my course, around 600 more senior pilots declined to bid.


...Concorde pilots were very well paid...

Not by comparison to B747 and B777 pilots of similar length of service.  crying 


...not sure of exact figures...

I am!  Wink


Babybus

...it seemed odd to have so much experience of an advanced aircraft only to gain experience on a slower, less technical one...

A lot of people confuse aircraft technical experience with command experience. Whilst good technical knowledge and experience of your particular aircraft is always valuable, it is not a substitute for command experience.

Command experience - deciding what to do and when to do it - is a different commodity altogether. BA knew that two technically experienced people (F/O & F/E) would be on board; they wanted to ensure that an experienced Commander was also on board.

To this end, the BA policy was that they would not allow a F/O, no matter how experienced on the fleet, to take a First command on Concorde, rightly so in my view.

However, remember that many of the Concorde F/Os were eligible for a Concorde command because they had already been Captains on the B737, B757 or A320 fleets before bidding for Concorde as a co-pilot.


AirWillie6475

...Concord pilots were usually the “diehard aviation junkies”...

I think you meant to say “dedicated airline professionals” ... Big grin


Best regards to all

Bellerophon

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: Speedmarque
Posted 2006-09-17 19:59:13 and read 7036 times.

I am BA shorthaul crew and used to fly with the concorde crew on the 757/767. It was funny seeing them with hats on (other crew did not wear hats unless on a promotion team event) and silver concorde name badges one day and then flying with the same person to MAN a couple of days later without their hat and now wearing a blue badge like the rest of us.

There were "lifers" who were on concorde for........life, and other crew who attended an interview and if successful went on the concorde for two years at a time.

If concorde crew were doing standby at the Compass Centre and were not used for a concorde flight, they would change their namebadges and ditch the hat to do a "normal" service.

Although glamourous the crew would always complain about noise, cramped galleys, hard work and HEAT as the a/c doors got very hot and along with the ovens being on made it unbearable.

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Cre
Username: David L
Posted 2006-09-17 20:49:33 and read 6516 times.

Quoting Bellerophon (Reply 18):
...No offence, but I do not believe that for a second...

Your privilege, but he is correct.

Well, I didn't know that, either. But I assume no pilots ended up on Concorde because there was nothing else available... or can the same also be said for the other types?

Good to see you're still around - I wondered if you'd given up on us.  Smile

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: Fbgdavidson
Posted 2006-09-18 05:57:49 and read 5473 times.

Quoting EGTESkyGod (Reply 12):
Are you serious?! No offence, but I do not believe that for a second.

A friend of the family was on Concorde fleet for some time, he retired in 2000 and probably falls into the "diehard aviation junkie" category that some people have mentioned....he was on 747 fleet before going onto Concorde and after leaving BA he went back to flying 747s for cargo airlines  Wow! He was recently headhunted and is now flying the Qatar Amiri 747 SP.

Bellerephon may even know the chap I am talking about. He was something of a character  biggrin 

It is indeed true the experienced 747 captains earn more £££ than the Concorde guys, to be expected when you are doing a two, maybe three overnight trips to JFK per month...

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: GDB
Posted 2006-09-18 20:19:22 and read 5257 times.

There was more than one character in the Flight Crew Dept!

Radiation-Concorde did have, due to the higher altitudes, detecting gear fitted.
Displayed in the flight deck, a measuring device with a readout in the form of a , IIRC, 7 or 8 character number.
Before and after flight figures were noted in the tech log, usually, of this number, only the last one or two showed change.

Radiation could trigger amber or red on the detector, Bellerphon will know of the procedures that would happen in this event.
(I hope I'm getting this right, I'm not reffering to manuals, they are not instantly to hand, I cannot be arsed to go and get them, and it's all 3 years ago at best now).
As far as I know, solar/cosmic radiation-what it supposed to be detecting, never did trigger it.
Even in Solar max years like 1978 or 1989.

It was triggered by ground sources however, which all aircraft flew through.

As stated, experience showed that the much reduced flight time of Concorde, was not really much different to lower levels and lower altitudes for longer.

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: Pihero
Posted 2006-09-19 10:10:25 and read 5013 times.

Quoting AirWillie6475 (Reply 10):
Believe it or not the Concord was a JUNIOR aircraft, meaning not many pilots wanted to fly it. It paid very little flight time and a lot of effort goes into the flights. Most pilots stuck to the other aircraft in the fleet. Concord pilots were usually the diehard aviation junkies who didn't really care about pay or schedules. I had no idea, I thought concord pilots were very senior pilots with decades of experience

As far as AF is concerned, that's totally incorrect.
AF pilot salaries are based on productivity, and the criteria for productivity are 1/the aircraft commercial speed, and , 2/the MTOW.
The formula is quite complicated and I'm not at liberty to divulge it here.
Taking that system into account, Concorde was the most senior aircraft on the fleet,more than the 744. To be a captain on that fleet, one had to be both old and very young (because of the bonding time system, a minimum of five years before retirement).
A lot of f/os gave up their command seniority to fly it.

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: EGTESkyGod
Posted 2006-09-19 14:56:07 and read 4869 times.

Quoting Bellerophon (Reply 18):
EGTESkyGod

When you asked AirWillie6475:

...Are you serious?!...

I believe he is.


...No offence, but I do not believe that for a second...

Your privilege, but he is correct.


...One of our instructors used to work for BA, and he said he knew pilots on 747s, VC10s, and all sorts of other aircraft and they would have given anything to fly Concorde...

I'm sure he did know such pilots, there were many of them. However they were not in the majority. Most pilots with sufficient seniority for Concorde did not bid for her. The year I got my course, around 600 more senior pilots declined to bid.

Coming from a former Concorde Pilot, I stand corrected.

Topic: RE: Is It True That The Concorde Had 737 & 757 Crew?
Username: N1120A
Posted 2006-09-19 18:14:53 and read 4720 times.

Quoting A340600 (Reply 5):
It was considered the ultimate dream of BA cabin crew,

I heard that it was only a short-lived dream because the lack of hours meant lower pay.


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/