Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/3216464/

Topic: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: KarlB737
Posted 2007-01-22 23:38:47 and read 7407 times.

Courtesy: New York Newsday

Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed

http://www.airportbusiness.com/artic.../article.jsp?siteSection=4&id=9820

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: RL757PVD
Posted 2007-01-22 23:41:01 and read 7396 times.

Damn, seems like ISP has been nothing but problems for them lately, didnt they have some terminal related problems lately too?

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: Lincoln
Posted 2007-01-22 23:42:52 and read 7382 times.

It sounds from the article like it's certainly in WN's best interest to get the problems fixed -- after all, the greatest threat of damage is to their own equipment.

I wonder how long it will be until work starts -- I certainly can't imagin them waiting until the dust from the suit settles.

Lincoln

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: RoseFlyer
Posted 2007-01-23 00:47:19 and read 7229 times.

The apron is only 3 years old. It's unfortunate that it has to be replaced and will be an inconvenience to WN. Fortunately for them they can go after the contractor for poor workmanship though, so they will likely have to do it again.

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: JetBlueAtJFK
Posted 2007-01-23 04:50:14 and read 6977 times.

ISP has its share of problems. They did have the non-functionign sprinkler system in part of the terminal and misplaced gas lines there too. Once the apron is re done and the entire WN section is fully open and operational, WN at ISP will be very nice and safe, I guess I can't wait until then, for now, I can.

B6jfk airplane 

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: Tbird
Posted 2007-01-23 12:35:48 and read 6721 times.

In the mean time WN will be moving their ops to the four new gates recently opened this past November so it shouldn't prove to much of a problem. I still want to know what WN is going to do with 8 gates at ISP. There hasn't been to much talk of expansion.

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: Necigrad
Posted 2007-01-23 13:53:18 and read 6655 times.

An "asphalt cartel" ROFL! Hope WN wins the lawsuit. From what I'm reading the work should be considered to not comply with accepted standards, which the contractor is responsible for.

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: AirTran717
Posted 2007-01-23 21:11:15 and read 5297 times.

Sounds like the same idiots who built my house. LOL

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: Hagic
Posted 2007-01-23 21:46:27 and read 4896 times.

ISP is and will always be my favorite airport. It's just 5 min drive from home, I'm through security in less than 3 minutes and for less than $100 I can fly Southwest anywhere in the United States.

I'm sure many of you would like to have such a privilege...  Wink

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: Mush
Posted 2007-01-23 21:51:17 and read 4857 times.

Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 3):
Fortunately for them they can go after the contractor for poor workmanship though, so they will likely have to do it again.



Quoting Necigrad (Reply 6):
An "asphalt cartel" ROFL! Hope WN wins the lawsuit. From what I'm reading the work should be considered to not comply with accepted standards, which the contractor is responsible for.

Not necessarily, the brief article is clearly written to convict the contractor of poor workmanship...however, if the contractor built the apron to the design and specifications then the fault may lay with the designer.


thanks,
mush

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: Blackbird1331
Posted 2007-01-23 22:02:31 and read 4713 times.

Speaking of airport construction,anyone know of the outcome/progress of the roof collapse at the airport that had,also, just been completed? I think it was in France.

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: Ikramerica
Posted 2007-01-23 22:18:01 and read 4573 times.

Look for the union label...  Wink

Seriously, that area of the country is entrenched with union graft and payoffs and construction fraud related to less than upright citizens running some of the big construction concerns.

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: Travellin'man
Posted 2007-01-23 22:41:22 and read 4337 times.

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 11):
Look for the union label...

Seriously, that area of the country is entrenched with union graft and payoffs and construction fraud related to less than upright citizens running some of the big construction concerns.

According to friends of mine who live in the area, and are big fans of the airport, it's more the contractor who didn't pour the concrete deeply enough below the frostline, and public officials who are to blame for lack of oversight, not to mention bending over backwards to accomodate Southwest financially far past the point of reason. This issue has been coming to a head for some time, as the problems were revealed almost immediately.

In this case the union would only have stood to benefit from doing the job right, because the job should have taken longer and cost more, if it had been done according to plan; so, in absence of a payoff (not unheard of in that neck of the woods), it seems on the surface that the blame lies more squarely elsewhere.

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: Chris133
Posted 2007-01-23 23:35:33 and read 3861 times.

Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 3):
Fortunately for them they can go after the contractor for poor workmanship though, so they will likely have to do it again.

WN has already gone after the contract that built the first phase of the new terminal for poor workmanship. This is just the second part of that same issue. This was know and anticipated. I believe that is the reason WN has not added service to ISP so that they can move to the new side and still operate with no interuptions to service.

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: Blackbird1331
Posted 2007-01-23 23:39:30 and read 3815 times.

T"Man. The contractor, the airport, the airline have nothing to say when it is right. The city inspectors are resposible. The contractor digs the trench; the city inspects to see if it deep enough. The contractor lays the reinforcement rod; the city inspects. The concrete is poured; tests of the pour are taken for strength requirments. Then, a final inspection and approval for intended use. In the building trades, it is with the inspectors where you will find the most corruption.

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: Joelfreak
Posted 2007-01-24 00:37:12 and read 3541 times.

Does anyone else think that WN may be slightly HAPPY about this? With US and DL possibly merging, and CO dumping the ISP flight, this makes anyone deciding to come back to ISP a bit leary of the entire airport...Just color me a conspirator...

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: Mush
Posted 2007-01-24 17:38:56 and read 3311 times.

Quoting Blackbird1331 (Reply 14):
T"Man. The contractor, the airport, the airline have nothing to say when it is right. The city inspectors are resposible. The contractor digs the trench; the city inspects to see if it deep enough. The contractor lays the reinforcement rod; the city inspects. The concrete is poured; tests of the pour are taken for strength requirments. Then, a final inspection and approval for intended use. In the building trades, it is with the inspectors where you will find the most corruption.

Alright, this is a little over the top...you can't blame the inspectors for this without knowing if they put it in their daily reports. I used to be an inspector (now I'm an engineer working in Brooklyn at one of the biggest public works construction jobs in NYC) and there were times when I noted in my report that the contractor didn't do things according to the specs and the Resident let it go. Also, the inspectors are only there to make sure the contractor installs the work according to the drawings and specifications. If the drawings or the specs are wrong or inadequate then the inspector can perform his job perfectly and the finished product will be crap because of a bad design.

For you to sit there and say it's the inspector's fault without know any additional facts insincere at best. Perhaps you know for a fact these inspectors are on the take. If that's true then you may want to talk to the police because you are an asset that they could really make use of.

thanks

P.S. I'm being sarcastic with the police comment. Sometimes it doesn't come across in print.

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: PROSA
Posted 2007-01-24 20:30:58 and read 3202 times.

Not to mention the fact that WN's new concourse at ISP is (or was, when I was last there in August) a concourse without a name. It had been named after Islip Town Supervisor Pete McGowan, but the name had to be removed after he resigned in disgrace.

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: Blackbird1331
Posted 2007-01-25 00:22:24 and read 3048 times.

Sorry, Mush, but I have been around. Did not mean to insult all inspectors, but I have seen enough "hush" money pass hands. And for the record, I have made contributions to law enforcement, and I do not mean the monetary kind. I go where I am needed. If I am wrong, I'll accept that and not argue. But, if everyone was doing their job, this should not have happened.
And I will stand by what I believe, before the permit is issued, the specs have to meet the intended use. I know, the inspectors do not approve the specs, but whoever it was, they must have known they were at an airport and saw that large airplanes would use that space. Maybe the person who authorized the work to begin thought they would only be flying 172's.
Sorry if I hurt your feelings, but no apologies to some sorry-ass that would take money instead of correcting a potential problem.

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Remo
Username: Mush
Posted 2007-01-25 15:04:56 and read 2848 times.

Quoting Blackbird1331 (Reply 18):
but I have seen enough "hush" money pass hands

Unfortunately, I've seen it also, and whenever I was able, I've assisted law enforcement also.

Quoting Blackbird1331 (Reply 18):
Sorry if I hurt your feelings

You didn't hurt my feelings...I was questioning how you could be so sure it is a problem with corruption of inspectors.

For the record, my personnel opinion, without any further info then what was provided in the article, is that this the fault of the contractor and the inspectors. From the article, my initial thought was that the water stops were either missing or installed improperly and that there probably wasn't enough reinforcing steel in the apron. If that's the case then it's the contractor's fault for not installing them properly and it's the inspector's fault for not catching it. I don't think it's a design issue, but I can't be sure because I haven't read the specs or seen the drawings.

thanks,
mush

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: ArcrftLvr
Posted 2007-01-25 20:15:40 and read 2751 times.

Quoting Blackbird1331 (Reply 14):
the city inspects to see if it deep enough. The contractor lays the reinforcement rod; the city inspects. The concrete is poured; tests of the pour are taken for strength requirments. Then, a final inspection and approval for intended use. In the building trades, it is with the inspectors where you will find the most corruption.

Unless the Town of Ronkonkoma operates different than most towns, the inspector does not inspect the depth of the excavation. Rather, they will do a rebar inspection once the subgrade is completed and the steel is set. Also, I don't believe the inspector inspects the concrete AFTER the pour. The inspector would not (and could not) verify the thickness of the concrete upon conducting the final inspection, either. However, the project managers acting on behalf of WN or the airport should have verified the depth of the excavation prior to the pour to ensure the concrete is poured to thickness spec'd out in the drawings. Also, the contractor should have generated a report stating that sufficient compaction of the subgrade had been achieved. The City may however, witness the slump test or require that the contractor submit the results of the concrete tests. The PM definitely should have been present for the slump test to verify the condition of the concrete. Also, the contractors as well as the project managers should have verified that the expansion joints were in the correct locations and depths..If all this was conducted, then it appears as though its a design flaw. In which case, the architect/civil engineer/and the City are to blame.

However, in my opinion, it looks like the contractor, WN, and the Airport are all responsible in this case. It sounds like the GC and the concrete sub performed substandard workmanship... I'm sure the City will file suit against WN and WN will file suit against the GC and their subs.

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: ADent
Posted 2007-01-26 02:21:25 and read 2666 times.

My friend worked for the state DOT in the midwest and they would inspect a lot when working on the interstates and other major road projects.

If the design called for say 6 inches of gravel the contractors would put down 5 inches. If you called them on it they would go 6, but if you did not the next section would have 4.5 inches. If you went to lunch or filed paperwork not surprisingly a lot of the work while you were gone would be slightly under spec. Same with the concrete, etc.

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: Boeing7E7
Posted 2007-01-26 06:11:29 and read 2565 times.

Quoting Mush (Reply 9):
Not necessarily, the brief article is clearly written to convict the contractor of poor workmanship...however, if the contractor built the apron to the design and specifications then the fault may lay with the designer.

Airport Pavement design is based on Federal Guidelines. It's a rather black and white specification. You either do it right or you don't. This reminds me of COS that just had to rip out a brand new runway due to ASR problems. There's really no excuse for it.

Topic: RE: Southwest's Concrete Apron At ISP Must Be Removed
Username: JetJeanes
Posted 2007-01-26 06:37:16 and read 2541 times.

The condition of the pavement ... is indicative of a 15-year to 20-year-old, rather than a 1-year or 2-year-old, concrete pavement,"

Hmmm sounds like the contractor put down some recycled concrete.


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/