http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/3649711/ | |
| Topic: US Operators And The A340 Username: FlyTweed Posted 2007-10-10 21:42:34 and read 1675 times. Forgive me if this may have been discussed before, but to my knowledge, there are no U.S. airlines that operate the A340. Any thoughts as to why/why not for long haul (transatlantic, etc.) or other use? | |
| Topic: RE: US Operators And The A340 Username: UA772IAD Posted 2007-10-10 22:39:23 and read 1675 times. 1) The 777 is more diverse and efficient. It generally offers a greater range with a higher MTOW, and customers have a greater "choice" of options (in terms of power plant/range). In this class (250-300 seats), the 2 engine 777 is more efficient than the 4 engine A340. Remember, Airbus went on a smear campaign at the launch of these two aircraft in the early 90s, claiming that four engines were better than two. It was a bit of a PR nightmare (IIRC). | |
| Topic: RE: US Operators And The A340 Username: Mariner Posted 2007-10-10 22:41:10 and read 1675 times.
| |
| Topic: RE: US Operators And The A340 Username: UA772IAD Posted 2007-10-10 22:44:31 and read 1675 times.
| |
| Topic: RE: US Operators And The A340 Username: MCOflyer Posted 2007-10-10 23:05:04 and read 1675 times. US will get 2 or more A340's by 2009. Etops1 can confirm this as well as other employees and other Frequent flyers. | |
| Topic: RE: US Operators And The A340 Username: Gigneil Posted 2007-10-10 23:07:14 and read 1675 times.
| |
| Topic: RE: US Operators And The A340 Username: Flynavy Posted 2007-10-10 23:12:01 and read 1675 times. Continental had A340 orders back in the 1990's as well. Obviously, like their 767-300 order, these birds NTU. | |
Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved. |