Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/467387/

Topic: MD-80's "Sex Appeal" Lives On In CRJ 900
Username: TWA717_200
Posted 2001-05-14 05:40:27 and read 4362 times.

The thing that I always loved about the MD-80 was how far the wing was placed aft on the fuselage. I was thumbing through one of the commercial aviation mags the other day and happened on a pic of the new CRJ 900. Right away I thought, looks like a MD-80 with winglets...In other words, I love it!

Check this link to Bombardier and tell me what you think.

http://www.aerospace.bombardier.com/htmen/regional/crj900gallery-6_4_1.htm

TWA717_200


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © AirNikon

Topic: RE: MD-80's "Sex Appeal" Lives On In CRJ 900
Username: ILOVEA340
Posted 2001-05-14 05:45:00 and read 4339 times.

I don't think that this is a regional jet anymore it ios just to big. same thing goes for the RJ-85 and 100

Topic: RE: MD-80's "Sex Appeal" Lives On In CRJ 900
Username: TWA717_200
Posted 2001-05-14 06:09:04 and read 4322 times.

The term "Regional" applies to the aircrafts service area, not it's size. That's how I understand it anyway.

Topic: RE: MD-80's "Sex Appeal" Lives On In CRJ 900
Username: N960AS
Posted 2001-05-14 06:35:21 and read 4311 times.

Hmm, I know what you mean. The MD-80 always looks so good because it is so narrow with its wings far back. The MD-80 really looks good in mostly white schemes like AS and the old QQ one. The MD90 was the apitomy of this, but there are very few of them around [sadly].

The CRJ900 isn't quite long enough, but its not bad. We need a long 717 or something, but I don't think that is too viable.

Topic: RE: MD-80's
Username: TWA717_200
Posted 2001-05-14 07:29:00 and read 4288 times.

Oh yeah! A 717-400. 242' or so. That would be sweet. Would look like a F-104 Starfighter on steroids.

Topic: RE: MD-80's "Sex Appeal" Lives On In CRJ 900
Username: Bigo747
Posted 2001-05-14 07:55:20 and read 4280 times.

I like the MD80, because from the side (in the air) it often looks like it has no wings or engines!


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/