Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/515669/

Topic: Which Hubs Will Become Obsolete In The Future?
Username: YQTYYZ
Posted 2001-07-09 01:20:32 and read 2563 times.

After reading one topic where one poster suggested that Singapore would become bypassed soon by longer- ranged planes, and all the different new city pairings announced in the news sections, I was just curious as to which current hubs worldwide will become obsolete in the near future?

Perhaps they will be affected by longer-range aircraft, capacity constraints, or other business considerations.

Topic: RE: Which Hubs Will Become Obsolete In The Future?
Username: Jimmygoodwin
Posted 2001-07-09 01:29:05 and read 2491 times.

Chicago! Whoops! Did I say that outloud? Rono is going to kill me!

Professionally,

Jim Goodwin
CEO UAL Corporation
A Proud Welfare-to-Work Recipient
A Chicagoland Community College Droupout

Topic: RE: Which Hubs Will Become Obsolete In The Future?
Username: Dutchjet
Posted 2001-07-09 01:31:55 and read 2479 times.

Interesting question that you raise. I honestly do not think that we will see any major hubs dropped in the future due to longer-range planes; when the 744, 343, etc were introduced, airlines could eliminate stops in Alaska on Europe-Japan flights, in India or the MidEast for Europe-Asia flights, and in the Pacific Islands on US-Australia flights. But most of these stops where more techinical in nature, the aircraft stopped to fuel and not many pax were interested in the intermediate stopover point.

If new longer-range planes could fly Europe-Austalia nonstop, I do not think we will see diminished service to Singapore, for example, since lots of people want to go to Singapore. I also question how many new routes we will really see: US east cost to Asian cities and US west coast to singapore/kuala lumpur are alway mentioned, but how many other new routes are we really talking about?

Topic: RE: Which Hubs Will Become Obsolete In The Future?
Username: YQTYYZ
Posted 2001-07-09 02:51:39 and read 2423 times.

Oops, I didn't mean rendered obsolete, but rather, at least see a reduction in traffic/passenger volumes. Hopefully that makes things a little clearer.

Topic: RE: Which Hubs Will Become Obsolete In The Future?
Username: SSTjumbo
Posted 2001-07-09 03:13:29 and read 2407 times.

Chicago will not lose any domestic buisness. Int'l opps will probably drop. BTW, I am personally hoping that there will be a western Europe-Hawaii with these new longer range aircraft if such a route doesn't already exist.

Topic: RE: Which Hubs Will Become Obsolete In The Future?
Username: BLACK BOX
Posted 2001-07-09 07:18:15 and read 2340 times.

Those with high T/F and low O&D traffic.

Topic: RE: Which Hubs Will Become Obsolete In The Future?
Username: Trintocan
Posted 2001-07-09 07:20:39 and read 2340 times.

ORD's international traffic is unlikely to fall as it is a major O&D destination for the Midwest of the USA and is a major centre of commerce.

A Western Europe - Hawaii route seems unlikely as the Meditarranean, Canary Islands, Azores and Caribbean provide for most European travellers seeking the beach.

Trintocan.

Topic: RE: Which Hubs Will Become Obsolete In The Future?
Username: D L X
Posted 2001-07-09 18:10:34 and read 2293 times.

"A Western Europe - Hawaii route seems unlikely"

Even East Coast US - Hawaii routes are unlikely since the Bahamas, Bermuda, and Virgin Islands are so close by. Why waste money going to Hawaii?


About hubs diminishing? Not likely. As more long range jets are brought into service, more fracturing will occur, but that will just open more markets for the current hubs as well. As in, although the stop in Singapore for Europe-Australia flights can be removed, there will also be the addition of long flights beginning or ending in Singapore, from North America. Also, there are very few examples of flights being dropped when an overflying route is created. For instance, UA opened up ORD-HKG. But, you can still fly with them on ORD-NRT-HKG and ORD-SFO-HKG. It's just another option.

Topic: RE: Which Hubs Will Become Obsolete In The Future?
Username: Teej13
Posted 2001-07-09 18:20:31 and read 2285 times.

I think traffic through YUL will diminish somewhat as foreign carriers opt to trade for Toronto landing slots.

Topic: Teej13
Username: FLYYUL
Posted 2001-07-09 22:05:26 and read 2235 times.

There are only 2 major carriers that have not opted for Toronto from YUL and those are Sabena and Swissair.

We are Canada 2nd fastest growing airport of 5million pax or more...

Cheers,
Mark

Topic: RE: Which Hubs Will Become Obsolete In The Future?
Username: Heavymetal
Posted 2001-07-09 22:34:37 and read 2232 times.

This question brings up the A380 question as well...

If you believe traffic into major hubs will thin as smaller city pairs increase, then you'll probably think the A380 is a machine too large, too late...

If you believe that the world's largest cities will continue to be served by premier gateway airports that are feeders to their respective countries, then the A380 will be needed and plentiful.

Here in the states, I wouldn't say the hubs are in peril, but I think you'll see stratification of flights into the Boston area,(Pan Am is onto something with Pease, I think) , plus thier new St. Louis home will relieve some AA induced headaches at ORD.

The biggest 'what ifs' are if Homestead in South Florida had been approved to be that area's fourth major commercial jetport (which looks like it wont happen)....and 'what if' Cleveland had said screw Hopkins and decided on an all new home for its' brilliantly run hub carrier, Continental. (looks like Hopkins is here to stay too.)


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/