Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/5541898/

Topic: 2 RG 772 At MZJ Not Up For Purchase?
Username: olddominion727
Posted 2012-08-17 14:59:52 and read 2993 times.

Curious about something... I see 2 RG 772's @ MZJ. Why wouldn't DL, AA, UA take them into their fleet and replace a few older 76X, or even US add them to their fleet to do the PHL-PVG route they were awarded? Wouldn't they go for cheap?

Topic: RE: 2 RG 772 At MZJ Not Up For Purchase?
Username: NorthStarDC4M
Posted 2012-08-17 15:02:00 and read 3005 times.

From what I've read:
Condition isn't the greatest
They are 777-200A models (short range early build)
Maintenance Record issues as well?

Topic: RE: 2 RG 772 At MZJ Not Up For Purchase?
Username: Stitch
Posted 2012-08-17 15:04:25 and read 2993 times.

Per Airfleets, one (PP-VRD) was parted out at ARG and the other three are with new customers (TransAero for PP-VRI and PP-VRJ; Afrijet for PP-VRC).

Topic: RE: 2 RG 772 At MZJ Not Up For Purchase?
Username: TC957
Posted 2012-08-17 15:13:02 and read 2942 times.

I believe the ex-RG birds are in a bad way and only worth scrap value from what I read on previous posts here on this subject. If US want to start PHL - PVG, they surely could do no worse than make Airbus an offer for the two ex-Kingfisher A345's sitting around in TLS gathering dust. At least they'll have crew commonality so less training expenses to start the route up.

Topic: RE: 2 RG 772 At MZJ Not Up For Purchase?
Username: Stitch
Posted 2012-08-17 15:55:13 and read 2819 times.

Quoting TC957 (Reply 3):
If US want to start PHL - PVG, they surely could do no worse than make Airbus an offer for the two ex-Kingfisher A345's sitting around in TLS gathering dust.

Far better for US to make a play for someone's A340-300 for that mission.

Topic: RE: 2 RG 772 At MZJ Not Up For Purchase?
Username: Boeing773ER
Posted 2012-08-17 16:11:33 and read 2761 times.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 4):

Exactly, I don't see why they should bring in another fleet type (777) which would require training, maintenance, ect. Even if these planes were at a great price they wouldn't be worth it. The A340 would be more economical with training, and maintenance. Now if they should pick up the A340-300/500 is an other story. The A340-500 would carry more people, and may be cheaper since the A340-500 isn't that desirable.

From what people are saying about these RG 772 they also probably wouldn't make it from PHL-PVG.

Topic: RE: 2 RG 772 At MZJ Not Up For Purchase?
Username: n471wn
Posted 2012-08-17 16:16:54 and read 2726 times.

Quoting olddominion727 (Thread starter):
I see 2 RG 772's @ MZJ

Are you looking at an old picture? These are no longer there and one was scrapped but as poster #3 pointed out the other ones are alive and well-----only two 777's have been parted out and they are line #8 and line #19. Two others have been written off due to accidents so a total of only 4 777's have gone to heaven.

Topic: RE: 2 RG 772 At MZJ Not Up For Purchase?
Username: Stitch
Posted 2012-08-17 16:37:57 and read 2662 times.

Quoting Boeing773ER (Reply 5):
From what people are saying about these RG 772 they also probably wouldn't make it from PHL-PVG.

As they are A Model planes, they wouldn't make it (with a payload) if they were brand new.  

Airfleets says VG's 777-200ERs went to Aeromexico and Transaero.

Topic: RE: 2 RG 772 At MZJ Not Up For Purchase?
Username: jfk777
Posted 2012-08-18 17:47:12 and read 1948 times.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 7):
Airfleets says VG's 777-200ERs went to Aeromexico and Transaero.

ILFC leased Varig to new 777-200ER with GE 90 engines, those were re-leased to AeroMEXico. RG had a very diverse and motly 777 fleet with seating from their original operators. The 777-200(no ER) referred to here were originally with BA and had huge First Class cabins. Its sad RG ended the way it did, they operated a very odd long haul fleet with 767, 747, MD-11 and 777's.

Topic: RE: 2 RG 772 At MZJ Not Up For Purchase?
Username: AR385
Posted 2012-08-18 18:09:27 and read 1907 times.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 7):
Airfleets says VG's 777-200ERs went to Aeromexico and Transaero.

And those were PP-VRA and PP-VRB.


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/