Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/5618562/

Topic: German States Pushing To Abolish Aviation Tax
Username: bavair
Posted 2012-11-24 20:16:08 and read 5155 times.

I haven't seen this anywhere, please delete if its been previously posted.

The state of Bavaria has initiated a motion within the Bundesrat (roughly equivalent to the Upper House in the US) to abolish the controversial aviation tax. Several other states have backed this motion. They have now requested for the government to pass a law to abolish this tax which has been costing airlines between 7.5-42 Euros per passenger which sums up to quite a significant burden.

Source

I think this would definitely be a step in the right direction to help Lufthansa and Air Berlin get back on their feet. I think the tax has really placed these two in particular at an unfair disadvantage. What do you think?

Topic: RE: German States Pushing To Abolish Aviation Tax
Username: incitatus
Posted 2012-11-24 20:44:33 and read 5105 times.

If the tax is abolished the UAE will be really disappointed...... They have been counting on the German government to help their business.

Topic: RE: German States Pushing To Abolish Aviation Tax
Username: JU068
Posted 2012-11-24 22:29:06 and read 4998 times.

I guess it is good that this time around it is the federal states that demands its abolishment, and not only the airlines.

Topic: RE: German States Pushing To Abolish Aviation Tax
Username: LOWS
Posted 2012-11-24 23:28:36 and read 4929 times.

Quoting bavair (Thread starter):
I think this would definitely be a step in the right direction to help Lufthansa and Air Berlin get back on their feet. I think the tax has really placed these two in particular at an unfair disadvantage. What do you think?

Why does the tax adversely effect LH and AB? Don't EK/EY et al. all have to pay it too?

Topic: RE: German States Pushing To Abolish Aviation Tax
Username: Byrdluvs747
Posted 2012-11-24 23:40:59 and read 4909 times.

Besides the UK, which other EU countries have a departure/arrival tax? Hopefully this will put some pressure on the UK.

Topic: RE: German States Pushing To Abolish Aviation Tax
Username: skyhawkmatthew
Posted 2012-11-24 23:49:26 and read 4880 times.

Quoting LOWS (Reply 3):
Why does the tax adversely effect LH and AB? Don't EK/EY et al. all have to pay it too?

Because just about all of LH and AB's flights originate or terminate in Germany, and the vast majority of every other airline's flights don't.

Topic: RE: German States Pushing To Abolish Aviation Tax
Username: shamrock604
Posted 2012-11-25 00:01:39 and read 4847 times.

Quoting Byrdluvs747 (Reply 4):

Ireland has one, but at 3 euro flat fee, its almost insignificant.

The Netherlands scrapped theirs, as I believe did Denmark.

Topic: RE: German States Pushing To Abolish Aviation Tax
Username: bavair
Posted 2012-11-26 01:47:00 and read 1927 times.

Quoting LOWS (Reply 3):
Quoting bavair (Thread starter):
I think this would definitely be a step in the right direction to help Lufthansa and Air Berlin get back on their feet. I think the tax has really placed these two in particular at an unfair disadvantage. What do you think?

Why does the tax adversely effect LH and AB? Don't EK/EY et al. all have to pay it too?

Please correct me if I'm wrong but from what I understand: For example, for Long Haul flights, LH and AB would have to pay 42 Euros per passenger, while the likes of BA and KL would only pay 7 Euros since they are operating a short haul flight from Germany before transferring to a long haul flight outside of Germany. At the same time, if a passenger is travelling from the US to India for example, LH would have to pay the tax while any airline that has its hub outside of Germany wouldn't have to. This means that in the end LH is facing an additional cost , potentially pushing business to the likes of EK.

Topic: RE: German States Pushing To Abolish Aviation Tax
Username: columba
Posted 2012-11-26 02:18:20 and read 1892 times.

Did not know that Air Berlin has such a big lobby in German politics  
They complained the loudest about the aviation tax.....good for them.........

Topic: RE: German States Pushing To Abolish Aviation Tax
Username: LondonCity
Posted 2012-11-26 02:45:59 and read 1849 times.

I thought these taxes were not payable by transit passengers. Certainly that is the case in the UK where our APD is not payable when passengers are in transit and holding a through ticket. For example, a passenger flying AMS-LHR-JFK would not pay APD and neither would someone flying IST-LHR-HKG.

APD is only payable if the passenger breaks his or her journey in London.

Isn't that the case too in Germany ?

Topic: RE: German States Pushing To Abolish Aviation Tax
Username: PanHAM
Posted 2012-11-26 02:49:07 and read 1844 times.

That is what politicians do not understand, that the business is not focused on Germany but through the hub system world wide.

Same with the ETS , all this can only be introduced on a world wide scale and even then, certain countries would find a way to compensate.

While here we have to go and follow the rules, i.e. political institutions, the main competetion is in countries where the owner of the airline also owns the country, runs the airports and the licensing board.

Topic: RE: German States Pushing To Abolish Aviation Tax
Username: Quokkas
Posted 2012-11-26 04:23:12 and read 1756 times.

When countries like Germany introduced these taxes Emirates argued against them partly because they didn't take into account differences between aircraft fuel use efficiencies and emission levels but also because ultimately they impose additional costs on passengers.

While Emirates might benefit in that they are taking passengers as far as DXB, compared to LH who would face higher taxes as they fly further going East (quite apart from domestic routes), they were still disadvantaged compared to TK. But EK have argued that for every 10% increase in fares there is a fall of 15% in passengers flying.

Those figures may be elastic, but I doubt that EK wants to simply have a larger slice of a smaller cake. To fill all their aircraft a larger cake needs to be baked. Punitive taxes on airlines don't help.

Topic: RE: German States Pushing To Abolish Aviation Tax
Username: r2rho
Posted 2012-11-26 05:45:53 and read 1662 times.

I'll believe it when it happens, but it is a good thing that there is finally a political debate about this unilaterally and arbitrarily imposed tax. It is a pity that with all the ideological/religious debate around ETS, these taxes which currently have a higher effective impact have not gotten much public attention.

Even more than the airlines, this tax has been really killing smaller regional airports in Germany, most of them having lost passengers in the past years. Among the German airlines, AB having more p2p and less hub operations, is more affected than LH, but LH in turn is made less competitive than other hub operators. German domestic flights are particularly hit because the tax is applied twice (once per departure).

Quoting LondonCity (Reply 9):
I thought these taxes were not payable by transit passengers. Certainly that is the case in the UK where our APD is not payable when passengers are in transit and holding a through ticket.

The whole setup is rather confusing, but my interpretation (and LH booking website) is that JFK-FRA-SIN indeed does not pay tax, but HAM-FRA-SIN pays 42EUR. HAM-CDG-SIN pays 8EUR (for the HAM-CDG sector)

Quoting incitatus (Reply 1):
If the tax is abolished the UAE will be really disappointed.

  

Topic: RE: German States Pushing To Abolish Aviation Tax
Username: PanHAM
Posted 2012-11-26 06:02:25 and read 1632 times.

Quoting r2rho (Reply 12):
but HAM-FRA-SIN pays 42EUR. HAM-CDG-SIN pays 8EUR (for the HAM-CDG sector)

which is a clear dis-advantage for German carriers. The biggest winner of this stupid tax are European hub carriers including TK

Topic: RE: German States Pushing To Abolish Aviation Tax
Username: LondonCity
Posted 2012-11-26 07:05:08 and read 1562 times.

Quoting r2rho (Reply 12):
The whole setup is rather confusing, but my interpretation (and LH booking website) is that JFK-FRA-SIN indeed does not pay tax, but HAM-FRA-SIN pays 42EUR. HAM-CDG-SIN pays 8EUR (for the HAM-CDG sector)

Thank you for the explanation. It does seem silly that a domestic passenger (from a German airport) who transfers at a German hub must pay more tax than he or she would if using a foreign hub.

In the UK, as I noted above, the APD rate is based on the traveller's final destination. So if I fly LHR-FRA-SIN then I must pay the same APD as if I fly LHR-SIN.

The reason for this is simple. If the UK government charged the APD to the transfer point then many people would not book direct long-haul flights from the UK because APD is very costly.

For example, the APD for a business class ticket from LHR to FRA is GBP26. The APD for LHR-SIN or LHR-FRA-SIN for business class is a GBP184.


http://www.abta.com/about/lobbying_a...ernment_affairs/air_passenger_duty


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/