Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/5644581/

Topic: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: doulasc
Posted 2012-12-26 18:24:44 and read 13074 times.

In the early 1980s after C.Edward Acker took over after William Seawell retired,he swapped the ex National DC-10s for more 747s with American Airlines. Last thing Pan Am needed was more 747s flying more than half empty on routes that were a over kill for a 747. Pan Am retired their last 707-321Bs in 1980. I would think some Boeing 767-221ERs would have been a good replacement for the 707s. I wonder if Boeing approached Pan Am to order the 767. By 1984 Pan Am had 747s,727s, A300 and chose the Airbus A310 instead of the 767. I think if Seawell would have stayed CEO he might have gone with the 767. When he ordered the L1011-500 that was considered to be the 707 replacement,Pan Am only had 12.

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: jfklganyc
Posted 2012-12-26 18:28:34 and read 13049 times.

I think Pan Am was going Airbus.

310/300 were good replacements for the 747.

Look at pics from JFK in the last few years...lots of busses around.

Pan Am didn't evolve quickly enough and didn't have a solid domestic route structure.

Many problems beyond 747s

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: yyz717
Posted 2012-12-26 18:37:18 and read 13004 times.

In summer 1978, when the 767 was first offered, the 767 was intended, at that time, to be a US domestic aircraft -- which would not have suited PA for a 707 replacement. PA also ordered the L15 (as you mentioned) in April 1978 as the 707 replacement just prior to the 767 launch.

By the time the 762ER was offered by Boeing in the early-to-mid 80's, PA had already absorbed National and had ordered the A300B4 and the A310. So it's WB fleet consisted of the 741, 747SP, L15, D10, A300B4 and A310. The last thing PA needed at that time was (yet) another WB type.

Although I agree with you that the 762ER would have been the ideal 707 replacement (in terms of capacity and range) but the 707 fleet could not have hung on that long. Very few early 767 customers still had active 707 fleets, so the 767 was never really a direct 707 replacement.

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: CairnterriAIR
Posted 2012-12-26 18:41:47 and read 12969 times.

At the time Pan Am was swapping National DC-10's, the 767 was not yet flying, nor was it planned to be an intercontinental aircraft (not ETOPS certified). Pan Am's domestic route system didn't warrant an aircraft the size of the 767 (the former National 727's were fine for that role)...nor was Pan Am in much shape to partake in an aircraft order considering they had just paid through the nose for National. Once twin engine widebody planes were permitted to fly across the ocean, Pan Am went with the Airbus 310...better pricing and deal for between the two than Boeing offered.

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: FI642
Posted 2012-12-26 20:16:58 and read 12646 times.

PA loved the A310, (or hated it as some of it's small size, crews found it claustrophobic).,
because it had good economics. and could serve markets that had low demand.
The A310's were also on month-to-month leases, which means PA could return the aircraft with a 30
day notice.Given the financial condition of PA, this was very attractive. ETOPS saved them a lot
of fuel, and the smaller aircraft allowed them to offer service to a number of cities that the 747
was not economical to use on.

About twenty years ago, I met one of the chief engineers on the A310. He said that he
was personally disappointed with the aircraft because of interior noise and the lack of
ability to extend the range of the aircraft.

I though it looked amazing in PA's Billbord livery.

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: UA787DEN
Posted 2012-12-26 21:29:16 and read 12433 times.

I can think of three main reasons:
1)Pan Am financial difficulty. They needed to keep costs low and revenue high to stay afloat. They didn't, and I don't know if the 762 could've helped. The 763s are pretty efficient but the 762s were much less so, especially the early versions.
2) The A300. They already had the A300, and it fit them perfectly. No real reason to change, and it could be expensive.
3) The 762ER wasn't ready immediately. The 762 could fill most then present gaps, but wasn't better than the A30) for them. Extra crew, mechanic, and ETOPS Tim's and money. Look at WN or most LCCs today.
You answered your own question somewhat. For them the 767 couldn't do really anything the A300/310 couldn't do, and they already had the airbuses. Had they made it through 1991 and 2001 and 2008, I wouldn't be surprised to see a long haul fleet of A330s, with A320 short haul and quite possibly the 747 or 777 for high capacity Long Haul. But I could see them using the A330s like some 767s are today. Also, they would probably have new passenger A300s, or at least circa 2006. They still wouldn't have a reason to get the 767.

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: jfk777
Posted 2012-12-27 04:36:31 and read 11783 times.

Quoting UA787DEN (Reply 5):
1)Pan Am financial difficulty. They needed to keep costs low and revenue high to stay afloat. They didn't, and I don't know if the 762 could've helped. The 763s are pretty efficient but the 762s were much less so, especially the early versions

The idea of a 762ER "saving" PA has some legs, but timing was an issue. TWA didn't operate the first 767ER(converted) from BOS to CDG until 1983, so Boeing would have taken until 1985 to deliver new 767-200ER's. By that time the first 6 A310-300 arrived in 1987 and 6 more in 1988. A 763ER would have helped PA but that plane wasn't around until 1988. BY 1988 nothing could have saved PA with the Lockerbie accident. The war in Iraq didn't help in 1990 and when Plaskett sold the LHR routes to United, that was the sign the end was coming.

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: upcfordcruiser
Posted 2012-12-27 06:33:07 and read 10865 times.

Airbus needed A300/310 customers and Pan Am needed new planes with flexible finance terms.

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: catiii
Posted 2012-12-27 07:22:19 and read 10173 times.

Quoting UA787DEN (Reply 5):
The 762ER wasn't ready immediately. The 762 could fill most then present gaps, but wasn't better than the A30) for them. Extra crew, mechanic, and ETOPS Tim's and money. Look at WN or most LCCs today.

How does the 762, a 2 pilot airplane, require extra crew?

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: 135mech
Posted 2012-12-27 07:36:01 and read 9994 times.

Quoting catiii (Reply 8):
How does the 762, a 2 pilot airplane, require extra crew?

You need new crews (extra) for a new plane type in the system, and new tools specific to that frame etc, plus all of the simulators and training.

A TON of extra costs for a severely struggling airline.

135Mech

[Edited 2012-12-27 07:37:32]

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: PanAm1971
Posted 2012-12-27 07:55:12 and read 9717 times.

I would add to what has been said that Pan Am was cash poor through most of the 1980's. However, in my opinion, had Lockerbie and the 1991 Gulf War not happened-there is a good chance Pan Am would have survived and become a smaller airline with mainly A-330's in the 1990's (and possibly with A-320's for short haul and a few 744's)

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: UA787DEN
Posted 2012-12-27 08:33:10 and read 9165 times.

Quoting 135mech (Reply 9):
A TON of extra costs for a severely struggling airline.

Plus all of the ETOPS time, training, and money.
IF Pan Am recieved a 767: At least a month of training without revenue flights, and a ton of extra cost.
If Pan Am recieved an A300: Put it straight into revenue service with crews already trained, and be able to return it at short notice.

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: catiii
Posted 2012-12-27 10:54:56 and read 7395 times.

Quoting UA787DEN (Reply 11):
If Pan Am recieved an A300: Put it straight into revenue service with crews already trained, and be able to return it at short notice.

You mean the A310...

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: Polot
Posted 2012-12-27 10:58:12 and read 7346 times.

Quoting catiii (Reply 12):
You mean the A310...

Either works, Pan Am had both.

Edit: Another plus for the A300 vs the 767 for Pan Am, other than the great pricing that Airbus was offering, was that they could take delivery of planes almost immediately, as Airbus was sitting on some unclaimed planes due to earlier cancellations from other airlines.

[Edited 2012-12-27 11:07:17]

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: catiii
Posted 2012-12-27 11:20:17 and read 7086 times.

Quoting Polot (Reply 13):
Either works, Pan Am had both.

Not in the context of a 30 day turnback. I believe that provision was only on the A310 leases.

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: G-CIVP
Posted 2012-12-27 11:35:39 and read 6922 times.

Because it had Airbus A300/A310 and also it was cash strapped in the 1980's. An argument in favour of the B767 is going to be counter factual, so I wouldn't bother.

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: jfk777
Posted 2012-12-27 11:44:26 and read 6796 times.

When PA went A310 the entire reason for a 767 left. Had they survived into the late 1990's then 767 may have helped. But its a moot point since once PA sold Europe to DL it was Delta's fleet plan.

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: steeler83
Posted 2012-12-27 13:42:00 and read 5720 times.

Why did PA buy out National Airlines?

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: jfk777
Posted 2012-12-27 14:02:57 and read 5498 times.

Quoting steeler83 (Reply 17):

Why did PA buy out National Airlines?

Because they "needed" a domestic airline. They should have purchased an airline with a hub in Chicago. National didn't have a Latin system in Miami, never understood what the point was. This has to go down as one of the worst megers in any industry.

Topic: RE: Why Didn't Pan Am Order The Boeing 767?
Username: FlyCaledonian
Posted 2012-12-27 14:11:28 and read 5430 times.

What's always struck me is that after DL acquired the JFK hub, and the PA A310s, that it ditched them in the mid-1990s for 763ERs. And this was after it added more A310-300s in the early 1990s.


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/