Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/5643682/

Topic: Early A380s Not Built
Username: 96adrian
Posted 2012-12-25 06:10:36 and read 14759 times.

When I looked at an A380 production list, I noticed that there are several airframes with an early MSN which are not built.

http://www.planespotters.net/Production_List/Airbus/A380/index.php

I see that there are some freighters to FedEx and Emirates with MSN 37, 53 and 60, but there are also some for Malaysia with MSN 18, 24 and 32.

My question is: will we see these MSNs in the air?

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: rj777
Posted 2012-12-25 06:25:17 and read 14688 times.

The freighters will not see the light of day (for now). The program was cancelled after FedEx & UPS cancelled their orders.

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: Stitch
Posted 2012-12-25 06:46:17 and read 14593 times.

Quoting 96adrian (Thread starter):
My question is: will we see these MSNs in the air?

I do not believe so.

Airbus delayed MH's deliveries due to production delays, which likely explains why MSN 16, 24 and 32 were never built / Not Taken Up.

While I personally believe the A380-800F won't happen, even if at some future date should Airbus choose to offer the plane again, the positions assigned to FX (MSN 37, 53) and EK (MSN 60) will remain Not Taken Up.

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: AustrianZRH
Posted 2012-12-25 07:01:15 and read 14477 times.

Quoting rj777 (Reply 1):
The program was cancelled after FedEx & UPS cancelled their orders.

Now I wrote a lengthy post about how the program was not cancelled according to the Airbus website, which still counted the A38F as active type two or three months ago. Now it's gone! Does anyone know if and when such a formal cancellation of the freighter program happened?

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: Stitch
Posted 2012-12-25 08:07:33 and read 14138 times.

Quoting AustrianZRH (Reply 3):
Now it's gone! Does anyone know if and when such a formal cancellation of the freighter program happened?

As I have not seen a Press Release stating the model has been cancelled (i.e. - Airbus formally stating they will never build one), I expect it's no longer formally on offer and that is why Airbus has removed it from their website.

[Edited 2012-12-25 08:07:58]

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: EMBQA
Posted 2012-12-25 08:24:32 and read 14047 times.

Quoting 96adrian (Thread starter):
My question is: will we see these MSNs in the air?

No you will not. Manufactures do not go back and use old serial numbers. They will just go down as Not Built.

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: Tangomaniac
Posted 2012-12-26 02:23:12 and read 6803 times.

The A380F is still on offer on Airbus' website. You only have to look at the freighter-pages, not on the passenger-plane pages. That has changed with the last restructuring of Airbus' website.

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: MEA-707
Posted 2012-12-26 02:33:17 and read 6693 times.

Quoting EMBQA (Reply 5):
No you will not. Manufactures do not go back and use old serial numbers. They will just go down as Not Built.

exactly. Also the 320, 300/310 and 330/340 production lists have spots open due to cancelled or delayed orders and such.

It would all be confusing to finally use these low numbers now. Technically it's possible as the 380 MSN's are not exactly built in that number following order. Say Malaysian tops up it's order, everyone would rather want them to have c/n's like 170, 185 and 202 for example, as finally filling up the low numbers 18, 24 and 32 would suggest it are already older and less able frames and people including mortgagers and brokers of aircraft would later wonder why these numbers are so low while already more then 100 are built etc.

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: SEPilot
Posted 2012-12-26 02:48:01 and read 6541 times.

Quoting MEA-707 (Reply 7):
It would all be confusing to finally use these low numbers now.

If line numbers are correlated to serial numbers it would cause unbelievable confusion to use those numbers. You will find AD's and service bulletins applying to serial number ranges, and to insert older serial numbers into later production would throw all of that into a cocked hat. Things move on, and if a number does not get built, so be it. Numbers are cheap; there is an endless supply of them.

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: TC957
Posted 2012-12-26 03:24:08 and read 6173 times.

What happened to MSN97 ?

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: KarelXWB
Posted 2012-12-26 03:26:27 and read 6147 times.

Nobody knows but it probably was a freighter.

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: KC135TopBoom
Posted 2012-12-26 05:55:57 and read 4705 times.

Quoting rj777 (Reply 1):
The freighters will not see the light of day (for now). The program was cancelled after FedEx & UPS cancelled their orders.
Quoting AustrianZRH (Reply 3):
Now I wrote a lengthy post about how the program was not cancelled according to the Airbus website, which still counted the A38F as active type two or three months ago. Now it's gone! Does anyone know if and when such a formal cancellation of the freighter program happened?
Quoting Stitch (Reply 4):
As I have not seen a Press Release stating the model has been cancelled (i.e. - Airbus formally stating they will never build one), I expect it's no longer formally on offer and that is why Airbus has removed it from their website.

UPS waited until after Airbus "delayed" the A-380F program to cancel their order, which was originally a conversion from their A-300-600F order. So, UPS got their deposits back. They then ordered 8 new build B-747-400Fs from Boeing.

FedEx did cancel their A-380-800F order, as did EK, before the program was officially delayed to try to catch up on the pax model.

But, I believe that within the last few months Airbus quitly changed the staus of the A-380F model from "delayed" to "canceled".

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: N14AZ
Posted 2012-12-26 21:30:15 and read 3926 times.

Someone from XFW explained me that they had already started to work on the detailled design for outfitting , e.g. for MSN 018. So there are already specific design features for a wave 1-MH-380 "in the system". If they now would use MSN 018 again all these specific design features would popp up again, which is of course not helpful and that's why they Don't use these old numbers.

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: jfk777
Posted 2012-12-28 04:55:38 and read 3272 times.

What about the Virgin Atlantic birds, they ordered 6 A380 way back in 2000. They should have been flying by now. Seems unlikely VA will ever fly them, seems that A350 are more likely at VA.

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: Stitch
Posted 2012-12-28 05:18:23 and read 3222 times.

Quoting jfk777 (Reply 13):
What about the Virgin Atlantic birds, they ordered 6 A380 way back in 2000. They should have been flying by now.

VS continues to defer their delivery.

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: FI642
Posted 2012-12-29 19:56:17 and read 2740 times.

Once an MSN is skipped, it normally remains that way. I cannot imagine Airbus going back to skipped numbers and using them. Several reasons for this, One the number was assigned to a specific customer, and two, it makes the frame look older. Remember NW wanting the DC-10-20 changed to the DC-10-40 because it made it look like the latest greatest thing? Same here.

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: WingedMigrator
Posted 2012-12-29 23:16:42 and read 2570 times.

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 11):
But, I believe that within the last few months Airbus quitly changed the staus of the A-380F model from "delayed" to "canceled".

If that were indeed the case, why would they not remove it from their newly redesigned website?

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: breiz
Posted 2012-12-30 07:24:07 and read 2294 times.

Quoting Stitch (Reply 2):
Airbus delayed MH's deliveries due to production delays, which likely explains why MSN 16, 24 and 32 were never built / Not Taken Up.


MSN 16 was allocated to Emirates from scratch and delivered in May 2008. You are referring to MSN 18.

Quoting N14AZ (Reply 12):
If they now would use MSN 018 again all these specific design features would popp up again, which is of course not helpful and that's why they Don't use these old numbers.


The parts planned for MSN 18 are said to have been re-used for MSN 45, delivered to Emirates in September 2009.

Topic: RE: Early A380s Not Built
Username: Unflug
Posted 2012-12-31 02:21:47 and read 1838 times.

Quoting N14AZ (Reply 12):
Someone from XFW explained me that they had already started to work on the detailled design for outfitting , e.g. for MSN 018. So there are already specific design features for a wave 1-MH-380 "in the system". If they now would use MSN 018 again all these specific design features would popp up again, which is of course not helpful and that's why they Don't use these old numbers.

That makes sense.

They'll only use the missed low numbers after they have run out of larger numbers, which won't happen that soon  


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/