Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/5693268/

Topic: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: BA
Posted 2013-02-17 14:11:43 and read 8098 times.

Can't find a news article, but I read it on some forums and checked it on the Delta flight schedules.

For the summer season, the new upcoming 3x daily LAX-SEA service on Skywest CRJ-900s is being upgraded to 1x 737-800, 1x 757-200, and 1x CRJ-900. They're also resuming MEM-SEA as a summer seasonal service with 1x A320.

MEM-SEA was dropped last year.

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: PHX787
Posted 2013-02-17 14:15:01 and read 8071 times.

What about CVG service to SEA? Last I heard it went seasonal too...what's the status on that one?

If SEA continues to expand as DL's asian gateway, i don't see why DL wouldn't expand more service between MEM and CVG

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: CIDFlyer
Posted 2013-02-17 14:16:16 and read 8046 times.

wow crazy to see an addition in MEM. Granted its seasonal but still...

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: BA
Posted 2013-02-17 14:20:15 and read 8008 times.

Quoting PHX787 (Reply 1):
What about CVG service to SEA? Last I heard it went seasonal too...what's the status on that one?

Still operating. Keep in mind though that it doesn't operate only in the months of January and February, so it's not seasonal in the sense that it's summer only.

Operates 10 months out of the year.

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: Tdan
Posted 2013-02-17 14:22:34 and read 7990 times.

Sounds like there might actually be some teeth to the AS/DL dispute rumor. That's a lot of additional capacity into SEA, particularly from LAX...

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: chrisair
Posted 2013-02-17 14:28:45 and read 7928 times.

Shame there's still some holes in the LAX-SEA schedule in July. No 9am departure like year's past. Hopefully AS (hint hint) fills out some of the holes.

I suspect I'll venture onto the DL 757 a few times this year. I miss flying those routinely.

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: phxa340
Posted 2013-02-17 14:29:08 and read 7928 times.

Quoting Tdan (Reply 4):

Sounds like there might actually be some teeth to the AS/DL dispute rumor. That's a lot of additional capacity into SEA, particularly from LAX...

Not really, DL has something like 9 widebodies a day from SEA .... it needs the feed to fill those planes. DL doesn't care if the feed comes from AS or DL.

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: BA
Posted 2013-02-17 14:36:14 and read 7851 times.

Quoting Tdan (Reply 4):
Sounds like there might actually be some teeth to the AS/DL dispute rumor. That's a lot of additional capacity into SEA, particularly from LAX...

Sorry, catch me up to speed, what dispute? The only AS/DL rumor I regularly hear about is them merging.

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: BA
Posted 2013-02-17 14:37:34 and read 7852 times.

Nevermind, found the thread...

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: GentFromAlaska
Posted 2013-02-17 14:44:27 and read 7780 times.

This sounds like one of the old NW 757 routes from SEA-MEM-MCO. I flew it back in 2004 from SEA embarking at SEA "S" terminal.

[Edited 2013-02-17 14:46:45]

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: wedgetail737
Posted 2013-02-17 14:50:35 and read 7716 times.

Sounds like the bookings for SEA-LAX and return are better than anticipated for the summer. The AS SEA-LAX flights (and vice-versa) are always FULL. Some of the DL pax are probably having a hard time getting decent fares between the city-pairs.

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: MaverickM11
Posted 2013-02-17 15:02:13 and read 7617 times.

Quoting phxa340 (Reply 6):
. it needs the feed to fill those planes. DL doesn't care if the feed comes from AS or DL.

It absolutely does--it can control the feed on DL, but not on AS. AS may be turning away DL flow preferring to take locals or online connections instead. I bet a local LAXSEA is almost always worth more to AS than the prorate they get for LAXSEAKIX/PEK/PVG/NRT.

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: wedgetail737
Posted 2013-02-17 15:02:34 and read 7617 times.

According to Delta.com, the mainline flights are only on Saturdays. REALLY????

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: BA
Posted 2013-02-17 15:16:47 and read 7491 times.

Quoting wedgetail737 (Reply 12):
According to Delta.com, the mainline flights are only on Saturdays. REALLY????

No, I checked the weekdays.

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: PSU.DTW.SCE
Posted 2013-02-17 15:45:06 and read 7323 times.

I thought MEM-SEA has always been seasonal for a few years now.

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: wedgetail737
Posted 2013-02-17 16:19:27 and read 7117 times.

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 11):
It absolutely does--it can control the feed on DL, but not on AS. AS may be turning away DL flow preferring to take locals or online connections instead. I bet a local LAXSEA is almost always worth more to AS than the prorate they get for LAXSEAKIX/PEK/PVG/NRT.

I'll 2nd that...I think AS can't provide enough capacity on their LAX-SEA or SEA-LAX flights to accommodate DL passengers. So, DL has to come in and help with the overflow. Although, I'm sure many do connect through SEA to other international destinations...not just DL.

It has been mentioned in this thread that AS carries a good amount of connection passengers to Emirates' SEA-Dubai flights.

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: lucky777
Posted 2013-02-17 16:51:17 and read 6958 times.

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 11):
It absolutely does--it can control the feed on DL, but not on AS. AS may be turning away DL flow preferring to take locals or online connections instead. I bet a local LAXSEA is almost always worth more to AS than the prorate they get for LAXSEAKIX/PEK/PVG/NRT.

My GOD....i seldom comment on these boards rather lurking and reading the interesting comments posed by the members on here, but you seem to have this unhealthy fascination with all things DL. I say unhealthy because you are constantly going out of your way to essentially trash Delta at every turn. Might i ask your disdain towards the Big D? You can have your own opinions but you can't have your own facts. Fact is, Delta is presently one of the best-managed, labor-friendly, profitable airlines in the skies with solid operational numbers to back it up and all i ever seem to see you do is degrade the airline, no matter how much of a reach it might be on your part.

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: MaverickM11
Posted 2013-02-17 19:23:38 and read 6435 times.

Quoting lucky777 (Reply 16):
. I say unhealthy because you are constantly going out of your way to essentially trash Delta at every turn.

Oh here we go . How do you get 'trashing DL' from a mundane observation that DL doesn't control AS, yet AS is an important component of its international flying out of SEA?

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: RyanairGuru
Posted 2013-02-17 19:37:17 and read 6369 times.

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 17):
How do you get 'trashing DL' from a mundane observation that DL doesn't control AS, yet AS is an important component of its international flying out of SEA?

I was wondering the same. I had to re-read your post 5 times to see if there was a hidden meaning in the observation that AS would rather handle O&D traffic than pro-rate connections  

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: Deltal1011man
Posted 2013-02-17 21:54:23 and read 5776 times.

Quoting wedgetail737 (Reply 12):

LAX-SEA
DL1026 0815 1100 757 D
DL4693 1520 1805 CR9 D (OO)
DL1853 2130 0015 738 D +1
SEA-LAX
DL4597 0645 0925 CR9 D (OO)
DL1735 1200 1440 757 D
DL1897 1850 2130 738 D

Note, starting JUL 26(LAX-SEA) DL1026 becomes DL4549 and is changed to a CR9 Also (SEA-LAX) DL1735 becomes DL4549 and a CR9

Quoting PSU.DTW.SCE (Reply 14):

I don't think they had it last summer. same for MEM-SFO

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: PlanesNTrains
Posted 2013-02-17 23:04:42 and read 5442 times.

Quoting BA (Thread starter):
For the summer season, the new upcoming 3x daily LAX-SEA service on Skywest CRJ-900s is being upgraded to 1x 737-800, 1x 757-200, and 1x CRJ-900.

Big upgauge, though personally I'd probably prefer the CR9's.  
Quoting lucky777 (Reply 16):
My GOD....i seldom comment on these boards rather lurking and reading the interesting comments posed by the members on here, but you seem to have this unhealthy fascination with all things DL.

Pot Kettle Black? Lol

Quoting lucky777 (Reply 16):
I say unhealthy because you are constantly going out of your way to essentially trash Delta at every turn.

What the heck are you talking about? Nothing he said was even remotely trashing them, and in fact mirrored virtually everyone's consensus that DL needed to add the metal to support their growing presence in SEA.

Seriously.....

-Dave

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: awacsooner
Posted 2013-02-17 23:09:05 and read 5415 times.

Makes you wonder why WN has yet to initiate n/s flights from the LA area to SEA?

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: PlanesNTrains
Posted 2013-02-17 23:16:47 and read 5370 times.

Quoting awacsooner (Reply 21):
Makes you wonder why WN has yet to initiate n/s flights from the LA area to SEA?

I've always wondered that, but one thing I'll say is that their plethora of one-stop, same-plane options in numerous city-pairs makes a huge difference. For someone like me who enjoys the same-plane, stop-and-go as an interesting diversion, I have no problem choosing WN. We've passed through RNO, SMF, OAK, SJC, and LAS as connections en route to the Los Angeles area over the years. Worked for me.  

-Dave

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: floridaflyboy
Posted 2013-02-18 05:13:54 and read 4482 times.

Quoting Deltal1011man (Reply 19):
I don't think they had it last summer. same for MEM-SFO

They flew both SEA and SFO from MEM last summer. Flew both several times.

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: n7371f
Posted 2013-02-18 05:49:15 and read 4276 times.

Quoting wedgetail737 (Reply 15):

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 11):
It absolutely does--it can control the feed on DL, but not on AS. AS may be turning away DL flow preferring to take locals or online connections instead. I bet a local LAXSEA is almost always worth more to AS than the prorate they get for LAXSEAKIX/PEK/PVG/NRT.

I'll 2nd that...I think AS can't provide enough capacity on their LAX-SEA or SEA-LAX flights to accommodate DL passengers. So, DL has to come in and help with the overflow. Although, I'm sure many do connect through SEA to other international destinations...not just DL.

Good point...Alaska by all accounts has a tremendous amount of spill on LAX-SEA and I see Delta's upguage as nothing more than trying to capture that spill. Ever try booking LAX-SEA on AS a day out on a Thursday or Friday? Good luck....almost always zeroed out.

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: Deltal1011man
Posted 2013-02-18 05:49:47 and read 4394 times.

Quoting floridaflyboy (Reply 23):
They flew both SEA and SFO from MEM last summer. Flew both several times.

Ah ok. Looks like MEM-SFO is gone this summer though.

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: luv2fly
Posted 2013-02-18 08:44:57 and read 3509 times.

Quoting CIDFlyer (Reply 2):
wow crazy to see an addition in MEM. Granted its seasonal but still...

Major cruise traffic out of SEA in the summer months, I am sure that is why this flight came back.

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: BigGSFO
Posted 2013-02-18 08:47:58 and read 3528 times.

Lest we forget that the AA code share also contributes to those full LAX-SEA flights. DL is smart to add their own metal. It's doubtful there will be much cannibalizing from AS.

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: IrishAyes
Posted 2013-02-18 11:50:32 and read 2644 times.

What about the MEMAMS flight?

Topic: RE: DL Upgrading LAX-SEA To Mainline, Resuming MEM-SEA
Username: iowaman
Posted 2013-02-18 12:03:09 and read 2592 times.

Quoting awacsooner (Reply 21):
Makes you wonder why WN has yet to initiate n/s flights from the LA area to SEA?
Quoting PlanesNTrains (Reply 22):
I've always wondered that, but one thing I'll say is that their plethora of one-stop, same-plane options in numerous city-pairs makes a huge difference. For someone like me who enjoys the same-plane, stop-and-go as an interesting diversion, I have no problem choosing WN. We've passed through RNO, SMF, OAK, SJC, and LAS as connections en route to the Los Angeles area over the years. Worked for me

I think WN could make a go of it if they really wanted to. LAX-SEA and PDX could likely be supported. There is definitely no lack of one-stops though and DL is another competitor now. IIRC WN will be getting a few gates with some gate shuffling but I wouldn't be surprised if the flights are allocated to other markets rather than WN battling it out on LAX-SEA/PDX. I also think it's very likely WN will fly DAL-LAX as soon as the Wright Amendment allows.

Quoting DTW.SCE" class="quote" target="_blank">PSU.DTW.SCE (Reply 14):
I thought MEM-SEA has always been seasonal for a few years now.
Quoting luv2fly (Reply 26):
Major cruise traffic out of SEA in the summer months, I am sure that is why this flight came back.

  

IIRC there is usually a more capacity on DL out of MSP and DTW and I'm guessing ATL as well. WN also runs a few seasonal only cities to SEA non-stop.

Quoting Deltal1011man (Reply 19):
LAX-SEA
DL1026 0815 1100 757 D
DL4693 1520 1805 CR9 D (OO)
DL1853 2130 0015 738 D +1
SEA-LAX
DL4597 0645 0925 CR9 D (OO)
DL1735 1200 1440 757 D
DL1897 1850 2130 738 D

Note, starting JUL 26(LAX-SEA) DL1026 becomes DL4549 and is changed to a CR9 Also (SEA-LAX) DL1735 becomes DL4549 and a CR9

Very nice schedule. DL is showing they are somewhat serious about serving the large O&D markets from LAX. LAX-LAS seems to be getting more capacity every so often.


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/