Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/5743419/

Topic: Southwest 2187 Diversion To O'Hare
Username: winstonlegthigh
Posted 2013-04-20 23:28:57 and read 9357 times.

A Southwest Airlines flight from Charlotte, N.C., landed at O'Hare instead of Midway this evening as a precaution after an indication of a possible mechanical problem.

Southwest Flight No. 2187 landed without incident, said a Department of Aviation spokeswoman. She had no other information.


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...-to-ohare-20130420,0,3346734.story

I'm in the west suburbs of Chicago and have a good view of one of ORD's approaches- I actually noticed this flight on it's final. It struck me as weird at the moment because inbound MDW traffic just don't come by here, and additionally- it's gear was down. Even ORD bound traffic doesn't have gear down at this point in their approach. Hopped onto here to see if there was any mention of this, but there wasn't, so I disregarded it until I happened upon the Tribune article.

Topic: RE: Southwest 2187 Diversion To O'Hare
Username: onebadlt123
Posted 2013-04-20 23:33:13 and read 9338 times.

They must have needed the extra runway length for landing.

Topic: RE: Southwest 2187 Diversion To O'Hare
Username: PHX787
Posted 2013-04-21 01:47:23 and read 9109 times.

If they needed extra length maybe it was either flaps issues or brakes issues...

Topic: RE: Southwest 2187 Diversion To O'Hare
Username: flyiguy
Posted 2013-04-21 07:30:21 and read 8635 times.

FLT 2187 CLT-MDW DIVERTED TO ORD DUE TO A GEAR INDICATION ISSUE. PASSENGERS WERE BUSSED FROM ORD TO MDW

FLY

Topic: RE: Southwest 2187 Diversion To O'Hare
Username: Manta
Posted 2013-04-21 08:45:50 and read 8417 times.

Who handles aircraft servicing and MX in this case? Where do they put the plane?

Topic: RE: Southwest 2187 Diversion To O'Hare
Username: jetskipper
Posted 2013-04-21 09:00:15 and read 8336 times.

Quoting Manta (Reply 4):

In this case it's pretty easy, they would just drive mechanics over from Midway. Most likely the aircraft is parked at a general use hardstand, similar to where the LOT 787 is parked. However for more intense issues, they would have to rent hangar space from a current tenant. For example, when an EVA 747's wing clipped and American Eagle CRJ last year, EVA rented hangar space from American for the repair.

Topic: RE: Southwest 2187 Diversion To O'Hare
Username: SXDFC
Posted 2013-04-21 09:27:24 and read 8211 times.

Does anyone know which "Nose Number" this particular plane is?

Topic: RE: Southwest 2187 Diversion To O'Hare
Username: flyiguy
Posted 2013-04-21 09:38:11 and read 8155 times.

Quoting SXDFC (Reply 7):
Does anyone know which "Nose Number" this particular plane is?

694 : a non-winglet 737-300

FLY

Topic: RE: Southwest 2187 Diversion To O'Hare
Username: ORDPARK
Posted 2013-04-21 09:55:44 and read 8044 times.

The Diversion was handled by United....At terminal 1

Topic: RE: Southwest 2187 Diversion To O'Hare
Username: n471wn
Posted 2013-04-21 12:36:24 and read 6299 times.

Quoting flyiguy (Reply 8):
694 : a non-winglet 737-300

Ironically this is now the oldest 737-300 and the oldest of all a/c in the SWA fleet-----it's first flight was on February 2nd 1985

Topic: RE: Southwest 2187 Diversion To O'Hare
Username: Roseflyer
Posted 2013-04-21 12:47:50 and read 6170 times.

They did a go around at MDW at the altitude that is around where gear is typically deployed.

I would guess that they did not get a proper indication for all three gear deployed. The articles seem to indicate it was an indication problem, so it might be a faulty proximity switch. Typical procedure would be to go around and perform an alternate extension ( pull the lawnmower rip cords on a 737) . Hopefully that would fix the problem. If it was a 737-300 they could go look through the sight glass to check if the gear is deployed over the wheel well.

Anytime you have a gear problem long runways are your friend which means MDW is out as a suitable alternate. Airlines have agreements with other carriers everywhere that they operate and file as alternates in the flight plans. It probably isn't the first WN diversion to ORD with the size of their ops at MDW.

Topic: RE: Southwest 2187 Diversion To O'Hare
Username: jayunited
Posted 2013-04-21 12:59:46 and read 6041 times.

Quoting Roseflyer (Reply 14):
Anytime you have a gear problem long runways are your friend which means MDW is out as a suitable alternate. Airlines have agreements with other carriers everywhere that they operate and file as alternates in the flight plans. It probably isn't the first WN diversion to ORD with the size of their ops at MDW.


You are correct this is not the first diversion of a WN flight to ORD it has happened in the past and United handles Southwest diversions at O'Hare and normally Southwest diversions go into gate B1 however yesterdays flight went into gate C21 here at Terminal 1. Southwest also in the past has used United's hangar but Southwests sends over their own maintenance people to fix their planes when they are diverted to ORD.

Topic: RE: Southwest 2187 Diversion To O'Hare
Username: CcrlR
Posted 2013-04-21 14:01:00 and read 5489 times.

Quoting jayunited (Reply 15):
You are correct this is not the first diversion of a WN flight to ORD it has happened in the past and United handles Southwest diversions at O'Hare and normally Southwest diversions go into gate B1 however yesterdays flight went into gate C21 here at Terminal 1. Southwest also in the past has used United's hangar but Southwests sends over their own maintenance people to fix their planes when they are diverted to ORD.

I've been out there on a few occasions and seen Southwest at United's gates and use their facilities to take care of what's wrong with the aircraft when they land there. It's hard to be able to do any MTX outside depending on what you need to replace or tasks to perform. UA, AA, and other airlines that have hangars have done the same for other airlines when their aircraft broke at ORD. Same goes for business jets too.


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/