Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/5833245/

Topic: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: william
Posted 2013-07-31 12:13:55 and read 20564 times.

My cousin plane spotting at LAX reports seeing a 777 push back from Tom Bradley terminal into A321 or A320. He saw it in passing, did not get the airline names. 777 and A321 tails were both damaged in incident. He thinks the 777 was a Star Alliance aircraft, not sure of who A321 belonged too. I am more details will follow.

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: AS737MAX
Posted 2013-07-31 13:15:13 and read 20120 times.

Well if it was the left side, American doesnt have airbus, so it must be the right side of tbit into either VX or F9

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: HNL
Posted 2013-07-31 13:34:11 and read 19915 times.

The OP mentioned a 321. Who else besides US operates the 321 at LAX?

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: Mesaflyguy
Posted 2013-07-31 13:42:06 and read 19821 times.

Star Alliance 777s at LAX today include B-2032 (Air China 77W) which, according to flightaware, has been in the air for two minutes, N794UA which pushed back a few minutes ago, and B-16701 (Eva Air 77W) which hasn't landed yet.

I don't know that much about TBIT, but I assume UA doesn't use it, so that would leave Air China and as we all know, flightaware isn't the most reliable so that could be it. The NH 77W isn't at LAX and SQ doesn't have their's there either.

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: william
Posted 2013-07-31 13:48:17 and read 19709 times.

I asked my cousin to make sure the details he remembered seeing and he stated it was a 777 and an A320. He was in the terminal when it happened. The livery he described on the 777 was that of a Star Alliance aircraft. I have been checking for any news out of LAX on this.

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: aaway
Posted 2013-07-31 13:56:53 and read 19585 times.

I just spent nearly two hours at TBIT north with my company aircraft. There weren't any Star Alliance triple 7s on that side today during that period.

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: citation501sp
Posted 2013-07-31 14:02:17 and read 19506 times.

Could it have been a UA 777 into a DL A320 from opposite sides of the alley? Or UA 777 into a UA A320?


501sp

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: Capt.Fantastic
Posted 2013-07-31 16:02:23 and read 18259 times.

This doesn't make sense to me.. He saw this only in passing, could not name either airline, yet noticed damage to both tails?

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: Wingtips56
Posted 2013-07-31 16:29:52 and read 17699 times.

As rabid as the Press is lately for airline "scares", and "disasters", you'd think something like this would have been reported by now.

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: ZBBYLW
Posted 2013-07-31 16:41:43 and read 17419 times.

AC also brings 321s to LAX.

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: jayunited
Posted 2013-07-31 18:16:36 and read 15617 times.

It could have been UA because sUA does have two Star Alliance 772ER. N218UA is flying IAD-NRT and was not in LAX at all today but N794UA which is currently in the air is flying LAX-NRT but is several hours behind schedule. I do not know the reason for the delay of flight 802 out of LAX but United did in fact have a sUA Star Alliance 772ER at LAX today. But if the tail of the UA plane was damaged as it has been suggested I highly doubt that the aircraft would be in the air on its way to NRT and as it stands right now UA fligt 802 is only 1:40 minutes behind schedule. Are you sure there was damage done to the plane or could it have appeared that two planes tails were touching simply from the position your cousin was standing in?

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: AA94
Posted 2013-07-31 18:32:19 and read 15333 times.

Quoting Wingtips56 (Reply 8):
As rabid as the Press is lately for airline "scares", and "disasters", you'd think something like this would have been reported by now.

Yeah, that's what strikes me as odd. The news media is out for blood in the airline industry. Surely something would've been reported by now.

Quoting william (Reply 4):
I asked my cousin to make sure the details he remembered seeing and he stated it was a 777 and an A320. He was in the terminal when it happened. The livery he described on the 777 was that of a Star Alliance aircraft. I have been checking for any news out of LAX on this.

Is it perhaps possible that, because of his viewing angle, the aircraft appeared to collide but actually did not? If he saw it in "passing," what led him to believe there was a collision and/or damage? Were there emergency vehicles around?

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: jmc1975
Posted 2013-07-31 18:38:25 and read 15213 times.

I opened this thread to see what I thought to be a legitimate incident.

Guess knot.

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: Wingtips56
Posted 2013-07-31 18:40:46 and read 15157 times.

UA802/N794UA was late due to a late inbound turn from NRT. It showed no more than about 2.5 hours on the deck, so that's not time for a serious check-up.

I did a search in FlightAware (I know, reliability issues...) on every 777 tail in Star Alliance livery that has it's photo here in A.net. All are accounted for, either not touching LAX today or on-time, UA excepting as above. So if the report is true, then somebody has a new one that nobody here has photo'd and posted yet.

And the 321 LAX operators (US and AC) don't show any cancellations for PHX, PHL, CLT or YYZ. (TA didn't show one arriving LAX today.)

I have to say, I'm skeptical about the report. Maybe the wrong alliance and/or A/C types. But still no news report on a bump at LAX today.

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: dtwlax
Posted 2013-07-31 18:49:24 and read 15001 times.

Quoting citation501sp (Reply 6):
Could it have been a UA 777 into a DL A320 from opposite sides of the alley? Or UA 777 into a UA A320?

Not possible.... UA and DL do not use TBIT at LAX; they have their own terminals.

Quoting ZBBYLW (Reply 9):
AC also brings 321s to LAX.

AC uses T2 at LAX not TBIT

Quoting jayunited (Reply 11):
It could have been UA because sUA does have two Star Alliance 772ER. N218UA is flying IAD-NRT and was not in LAX at all today but N794UA which is currently in the air is flying LAX-NRT but is several hours behind schedule. I do not know the reason for the delay of flight 802 out of LAX but United did in fact have a sUA Star Alliance 772ER at LAX today. But if the tail of the UA plane was damaged as it has been suggested I highly doubt that the aircraft would be in the air on its way to NRT and as it stands right now UA fligt 802 is only 1:40 minutes behind schedule. Are you sure there was damage done to the plane or could it have appeared that two planes tails were touching simply from the position your cousin was standing in?

UA uses T7 which is nowhere close to TBIT

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: olliejolly
Posted 2013-07-31 19:35:55 and read 14291 times.

I mean no disrespect but this sounds a little muddled.
Your cousin was "plane spotting" and yet didn't get EITHER airline?
I don't understand how he saw it happen, and yet didn't recognize either tail?
Sorry, I'm just a bit confused.

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: Norcal773
Posted 2013-07-31 22:15:37 and read 12377 times.

This would be a good time to lock this thread mods. Report is based off of a cousin to a friend's brother who happened to be plane-spotting at LAX while on the go and clearly saw two planes bump but didn't care to stop and find out more. I throw the BS flag on this thread, hate to say!

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: airportugal310
Posted 2013-07-31 22:53:15 and read 11945 times.

Quoting Norcal773 (Reply 16):

Motion seconded.

All in favor?

Topic: RE: Collision On Ramp At LAX
Username: moderators
Posted 2013-07-31 23:42:40 and read 11379 times.

As this is not substantiated the thread is being archived.


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/