Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
US Airline Service To London City?  
User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 2
Posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 4688 times:

As Stansted is being hailed the "new Heathrow" by the British Government, huge focus is being placed on the growth of the airport.

Would a US airline theoretically be allowed to switch all of its Gatwick flights to STN while beefing up frequency to The States, and offer connections via air from STN to LCY onboard an aircraft (operating in a shuttle, quick-turn manner) such as the ARJ-85 or Dash 8-300? The segment could not be sold as a separate STN-LCY flight, of course, but could be touted as a continuation service to the heart of London.

If the answer is yes, would this option actually be a good idea? Is LCY that convenient for the majority of business travellers into London? Would a LCY spur flight be more convenient than, say, taking the train from STN into the city?


F L Y 7 7 7 U A L

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineMandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 7561 posts, RR: 76
Reply 1, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 4673 times:

Why not fly to MAN, AMS, CDG and get a connection to LCY ?  Smile


When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 4655 times:

The point is to serve London as a city, not LCY or STN as destination airports. The LCY extension would be more of a train or coach-like service to downtown, rather than a connection airport (if that makes sense...). The LCY service would in a way compete with the train for bringing STN passengers into the city, but would be offered more as a customer perk--seamless service to Downtown with the airline versus travelling by a completely different means on an entirely separate company. Otherwise, a nice hop over to MAN and then to LCY would be perfect!

F L Y 7 7 7 U A L

User currently offlineSteman From Germany, joined Aug 2000, 1479 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 4649 times:

It would be more practicle to improve the current Stansted Express train service to Liverpool Street Station which is a lot closer to the city than LCY.
Currently the train takes 45 minutes but it runs very slow and has some stops so it shouldn't be difficult to convert it into a high speed no stop connection.
Another option could be to extend some underground lines to STN like the Piccadilly does for Heathrow.
But if you look at a map of London you can see how close to the centre is LHR compared to either Stansted, Gatwick and Luton so it will be hard to beat it.



User currently offlineVfw614 From Germany, joined Dec 2001, 4511 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 4616 times:

How about buying some niche German "Transrapid" magnetic monorails and travel with 250mph to the city centre - like the chinese have done for Shanghai-Pudong Airport (the vehicles are actually no monorails, but I don't know the correct technical term in English)  Wink/being sarcastic

Airport charges at LCY are horrendous (Europe's most expensive airport), so I am not sure if your plan would be feasible economically (in addition to the problems that LCY has limited space at peak hours and probably would not want to waste slots for a STN service). Why not use the Battersea heliport for a heli-shuttle ...  Wink/being sarcastic And as suggested, from AMS it is only a short across the Channel to LCY - probably not much longer than from STN when it comes to travel time....

User currently offlineGodbless From Sweden, joined Apr 2000, 2753 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 4615 times:

When I first read the topic I saw an AA 777 land at LCY...
As mentioned above it makes more sense to fly to CDG, FRA, AMS or elsewhere than to fly to STN and then take a connection to LCY as that would in the end take more time than the Stansted Express.
But after I have been to STN I can say that I wouldn't really want to land there coming from far away...


User currently offlineStretch 8 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 2568 posts, RR: 15
Reply 6, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 4597 times:

No way LCY or LGW. It's "Hounslow/Heath" for me, baby, now and forever!

Maggs swings, it's a drive deep to left! The Tigers are going to the World Series!!!
User currently offlineB-HOP From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2000, 729 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (13 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 4553 times:

With our railway system, don't think any upgrade would happen for a lon long time, I mean, it is even possible to link West Coast mainline (manchester,Birmingham) to Heathrow through a junction in West London, but yet nothing happens.

Live life to max!!!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
US Airline Service To Africa-Why Isn't There Any? posted Thu May 1 2003 22:40:08 by DeltaRules
New Airline Service To San Diego posted Mon Jul 10 2006 20:14:52 by B737100
Trans-Atlantic To London City posted Wed May 17 2006 08:55:48 by FLY777UAL
US Airways Service To Barbados posted Fri Jan 20 2006 00:32:16 by BGIplanefreak
747 Service To London Stansted posted Wed May 12 2004 10:09:00 by Voyager
Airline W/ Service To All S. American Countries? posted Tue Aug 26 2003 17:35:18 by Pzurita1
LHR/LGW To London City Center posted Mon May 26 2003 02:34:24 by DFWLandingPath
Does Any US Airline Fly To Portugal? posted Wed Jan 1 2003 23:57:53 by FRA_M25
Luton To London City Train posted Sat Sep 21 2002 10:35:10 by Airbus Lover
Delta To Start New Service To London posted Mon Sep 24 2001 19:15:02 by 777-200