Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CX/AA Code-share Approved, Including 20 US Cities  
User currently offlineBigo747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 3134 times:

Cathay Pacific and American Airlines' proposed coe-share plan has been finally approved.

U.S. destinations open to Cathay customers include Atlanta, Austin, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Denver, Detroit, Fort Lauderdale, Houston, Las Vegas, Miami, New York, Orlando, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, San Diego, San Jose, San Juan, St. Louis, and Washington DC.

Cathay has been granted the right to offer intra-North American services by code-sharing from its Canadian and U.S. gateways - namely, Vancouver, Toronto, Los Angeles, New York JFK, and San Francisco.

29 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineBlink182 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 5483 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3097 times:

I have three questions. What is the source? And, what Asian cities get AA codeshares? Does this mean American will start US-HKG services?

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineLadevale From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3056 times:

Check the news section of this site and you will find a report citing Cathay itself.

My thinking is that AA hasn't made a press release itself because it is still weighing its strategic options.

One of those options could be an ORD-HKG route. But this would require a side-agreement with its pilots. Knowing AA management, they are probably using the possibility of such a route as a bargaining chip. The two parties are currently in discussions over the Eagle ASM cap.

Whatever strategic decisions AA eventually makes, AA's entry into the HKG market does not bode well for United.


User currently offlineHkgspotter1 From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3008 times:

I want to see more AA 772's in Hong Kong...... PLEASE ??

User currently offlineScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2993 times:

Hkgspotter1,

Because with U.S. Government was said no for AA did not flies to HKG flight and it was very disappointed for the routes from 3 years ago. I do knew that remembered from 3 years of the press releases for myself into the AA.com before. It's should be wait until US Government or DOT will make decisions to go for HKG flight and it was already flies for nonstop from EWR-HKG on B777 from 2 years ago by the first-ever nonstop. Well, talk ya later!

Regards,

Scott W.


User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8034 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2985 times:

I think with the AA/CX codeshare approved, there is now this possibility: SJC-HKG using either a 777-200ER (AA) or an A340-300 (CX). There are enough Chinese (like me Big grin ) in the southern San Francisco Bay Area to make such a flight viable at least five times per week.  Smile

User currently onlineOzarkD9S From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5222 posts, RR: 21
Reply 6, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2969 times:

It's good to see STL on the list. We're finally becoming a significant part of a global network. Much as I miss TWA, STL was getting the short shrift on the world scene as TWA just didn't lure in the big international fish. They had a start with Royal Jordanian, Royal Air Maroc, Kuwait Airways, Air Malta and the never-implemented America West alliance, but never had the chance to become what I envisoned: The US partner of choice for second-tier airlines of litlle interest to the larger alliances. I always hoped for a "Trans World Alliance" featuring TWA/HP and a slew of smaller international carriers...Oh well, I also dreamed of Ozark (1) becoming a major on it's own much as USAir and Piedmont did...old dreams die hard. Now I hope for any international expansion at STL on the part of AA or oneworld.


The best IFE: A window seat and a good book.
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2954 times:

I think with the AA/CX codeshare approved, there is now this possibility: SJC-HKG using either a 777-200ER (AA) or an A340-300 (CX).

AA has already stated that after its new NRT flight begins, any further Asian expansion on its behalf will take place at Chicago


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 8, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 2945 times:

CX already serves SFO.... but it would certainly make more sense from a leveraging connecting opportunities perspective to switch that service to SJC.

I wonder if that would significantly impact their loads negatively? It would do some positively by allowing AA passengers to connect on.

N


User currently offlineBlink182 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 5483 posts, RR: 15
Reply 9, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 2927 times:

CX drop SFO? I can't see it happening. San Fransisco is too big of a market not to warrant HKG service.
If any new AA/CX service to HKG happens, my gut feeling is it will be an AA 777.

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlinePilottim747 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1607 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2893 times:

I agree with Blink182 that any new services to HKG will probably be on an AA777. They've been waiting for years to get this access.

pilottim747



Aviation Photographers & Enthusiasts--Coordinate your life.
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2887 times:

Both airlines have been blowing a good bit of hot air about new USA/HKG routes as of late... with nothing to show for it.

How long now has CX been talking of its "upcoming" NYC nonstop?

How long now has AA been talking about flying its metal to HKG?

Too long for any of us to really care until we see a plane full of pax land at either place... IM[NS]HO  Big grin


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 12, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2863 times:

Now now...

CX has been awaiting the arrival of their A346 fleet to begin nonstop service to JFK.

And now that there's a new bilateral, replete with semi-open skies and 5th freedoms for US carriers, AA might make a move.

Blink182-

I never suggested discarding San Francisco. Just eschewing SFO for SJC.

SJC is not hugely more inconvenient from the city (take 280 down and around), much business travel is technology oriented and is in the South Bay area anyway. You'd also get more connecting opportunities via an AA quasihub.

Just something to wrap the brain around...

N


User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8034 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2838 times:

Given that CX still has a good-sized A340-300 fleet, I think with the new codeshare agreeement approved there's a very good chance CX will very seriously consider flying between HKG and SJC, especially for business travel. People forget that in the southern San Francisco Bay Area there are large communities of Asians (more than just Chinese and Vietnamese--there are large Indian and Pakistani populations) that would love to be able to fly to Asia without the longer ground trip to SFO. Since SJC now has 10,000+ foot runways, a fully-loaded A343 should be able to fly from SJC to HKG non-stop year-round.

One idea that might work is SJC-HKG five times per week, with CX flying three times per week and AA flying two times per week. The flights will leave from SJC pretty much within one hour of the same time UA 805 leaves SFO for HKG, so the flights will arrive at HKG in the late afternoon the next day. There's no way SJC-HKG will be a late evening flight due to noise curfews at SJC after 2300 hours local time.


User currently offlineBlink182 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 5483 posts, RR: 15
Reply 14, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2767 times:

RayChuang, don't you think alternating the flights would confuse the average pax(ie, not an a.net user)?

I am curious to see how ORD gets service, whether it is AA or CX is the question, but AA/CX would love to connect two big hubs.

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2762 times:

CX has been awaiting the arrival of their A346 fleet to begin nonstop service to JFK.

Actually, CX has announced in the past that they would begin nonstop HKG-NYC service first with a 747 (1998), then with an A343 (2001), then with an A346 (2003).... now what're they going to wait for? 772LR? Sonic Cruiser? Bat Wing? Teleportation  Laugh out loud


User currently offlineCx flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6638 posts, RR: 55
Reply 16, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2707 times:

I believe that Cathay has already announced when they are going to start the JFK direct flight. I just can't remember when it was.

The A340-600 has not been doing very well and Cathay are not too happy with it. It is overweight compared to what they expected, and the aircraft does not meet up to the performance figures given by Airbus. During the initial hoohah about this aircraft Cathay regarded it as a replacement one day for the 744s. Now, the aircraft carries 100 less passengers and even then cannot make JFK-HKG on a full load without payload penalties. Don't hold your breath for us getting more than 3.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 17, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2700 times:

I don't understand how Cathay could know if it could make JFK-HKG without weight restrictions having not tried it.

How far off have they been flying it? Taipei? Is that a sufficient demonstration of the aircraft's capability?

I'm not saying its not true, just that I don't understand it.

Virgin has announced they're quite pleased with the aircraft, and that it meets expectations. We'll have to wait and see in terms of other airlines getting the plane as well.

Are things like this possible to fix?

N


User currently offlineRipcordd From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 1196 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2693 times:

AA is dying to start ord-hkg service, there loop-hole around not getting approval is it will be a CX flight number with a AA code-share flight number operated by AA's 777 with AA pilots and AA fa's. This will be great news for AA and ORD@HKG bad news for UA

User currently offlineCx flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6638 posts, RR: 55
Reply 19, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2697 times:

I am not sure how far Virgin flies their A346s, but I think that Tokyo is the furthest, which doesn't compare to JFK-HKG at the height of winter.

Cathay have been flying to LAX 3/4 times a week. It does not take long after an aircraft type starts flying for the actual performance figures to be released, and every airline has different cabin interiors and different weights so one airline being happy with then does not mean another will also be happy, especially if expectations were different to begin with.

If these problems are indeed true, then I guess the savings can be from engine upgrades/modifications in order to improve efficiency.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 20, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2683 times:

Hmm. I was under the impression that Cathay had a very low seat count, certainly lower than the 380 pax Airbus claims it can fly 7500 miles.

This will be very disappointing if the aircraft isn't meeting expectations. I hope the A345 fares better.

I also hope these are problems that Airbus and/or Rolls Royce can resolve.

So in problems like this, is it Airbus' fault, or Rolls Royce's?

N


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2636 times:

I don't understand how Cathay could know if it could make JFK-HKG without weight restrictions having not tried it.

They always knew some weight restriction would be included. The A346 has a range of 7500nm. HKG-JFK is 7014nm, and that's just the great-circle route, not the still-air.


User currently onlineHkg82 From Hong Kong, joined Apr 2002, 1322 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2643 times:

Now that the US & HK have clinched a new air services agreement, it's all the more likely AA or CX would begin an ORD-HKG service.

It’d be great if CX would do HKG-SJC now that they can but I don’t it happening, they’re very conservative when it comes to route expansion. Can CX do routes between Europe & America as a result of the new agreement or is that only possible with a full open skies deal?

As for HKG-JFK nonstop, I think CX said they would most probably start flights in April (after receiving all 3 A346s) but in this environment, who knows when they’ll start the flights!!

Hkg82.


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2620 times:

If CX is so disappointed with the A346's performance.... perhaps it's the one who recently ordered the eight 773ERs incognito??

User currently offlineBlink182 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 5483 posts, RR: 15
Reply 24, posted (11 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2586 times:

Just for the record, who here thinks DFW will get HKG service? I don't, especially if CX is unhappy with the A346 and unless AA feels a needy desire to link DFW-HKG, I do not think it will happen. I do think though, that ORD is a matter of when, not if.

blink



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
25 Gigneil : Concordeboy- Its certainly possible, but the general consensus from the CX employees has been that they're very anti-ETOPS over there, and will never
26 Cx flyboy : Gigneil, Although CX have only 289 seats or so in the A346, the seat pitches are basically the same as the other aircraft in the fleet, except for bus
27 ConcordeBoy : Its certainly possible, but the general consensus from the CX employees has been that they're very anti-ETOPS over there, and will never fly the 777 o
28 Gigneil : Cx_flyboy- I finally found a seating plan for the A346. The only one you guys have is on your USA website. Not only is the business class pitch much m
29 Post contains images ConcordeBoy : at least more than the 772ER CX doesnt operate the 772ER I also hope the performance problems don't affect the starting of the JFK nonstop service. Do
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
LX/AA Code Share Ending? posted Sat Jun 5 2004 22:37:21 by ContinentalEWR
CX Expands Code-share With BA posted Tue Dec 18 2001 10:49:17 by Victor
TAM - AA Code Share Rocks! posted Tue Jun 26 2001 04:39:45 by Copacabana
BA/AA Code-share => Died posted Mon Mar 26 2001 23:51:37 by Jiml1126
UA/US Code Share Cities, Smaller Markets. posted Wed May 21 2003 21:54:22 by John
AA Adds 3rd Daily BOS-LHR; CX Code-share Soon posted Tue Jan 14 2003 04:54:12 by Bigo747
ANA Expands In US; More Code-share UA Cities posted Sat Dec 21 2002 18:34:56 by Bigo747
Did AC Code Share With CX In 1990? posted Fri Jul 14 2006 17:23:22 by Bmacleod
US Airways.com Not Showing Code-share Flights? posted Fri Jul 7 2006 21:01:25 by PHLJJS
HP/RJ Alliance / Code Share US - Jordan posted Wed Feb 22 2006 12:20:15 by ANother