Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Didn't IAE Build The PW6000?  
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 79
Posted (13 years 4 months 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 4072 times:

I mean, it looks like all the other IAE engines - with the signature Rolls Royce shaped nacelle and all, just like the RB211 on the 757, 744, and 763, and the Trent 700.

Why is this a Pratt engine and not an IAE engine?

I'll venture that its because RR already made the BR715 in this thrust class... but I want to hear from others too.

I wonder if it might have gone more smoothly had RR and everyone participated.


And now that I think about it, does the CFM56 really make sense for the A318? It weighs exactly the same as all the other -5B engines. Is this what makes the A318 so heavy, just like it makes the 736 so heavy?

The PW 6000 is much lighter than the V2500... but so is the CFM56-5B.

Its nice to be able to edit.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy



[Edited 2003-01-24 10:14:32]

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineDynkrisolo From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1895 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (13 years 4 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 4021 times:

My understanding is the IAE agreement has a specific thrust range. The PW6000 thrust falls outside of the V2500 range. The advantage of partnership is one has others to share the risks and development costs. The advantage of going alone is one could potentially pocket all the profits provided the program is successful.  Big grin

The A318 and the 736 are heavy not because of the engine. Both are double shrinks. That's why they have a lot of structural redundancies. For example, the wing is larger than necessary. If my understanding is correct, the PW6000 is not that much lighter than the V2500. Just check the weight difference between the A318 and 717 and you will know what I mean.

User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 79
Reply 2, posted (13 years 4 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3971 times:

The PW6000 is MUCH lighter than the V2500... over 3000 pounds lighter per powerplant, about 2/3s the weight. The CFM56 is at least 2500 pounds lighter than the V2500 in any incarnation as well.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Did Boeing Build The 720? posted Mon Apr 17 2006 15:34:57 by Swissgabe
Why Didn't FedEx Buy The 737-900F? posted Sun Jan 8 2006 19:48:52 by OyKIE
Why Didn't AC Keep The 747 Longer? posted Tue Mar 29 2005 07:00:43 by AC787
Why Didn't AA Keep The 717? posted Sat May 15 2004 23:23:41 by Akjetblue
Why Didn't Boeing Lengthen The New 777s posted Sat Mar 13 2004 23:54:39 by Horus
Why Didn't NW Take The 764? posted Wed Jan 21 2004 00:57:27 by ORBITJFK
Why Didn't Boeing Build A 4 Engined 777? posted Sat May 11 2002 06:53:31 by Dennys
Why Didn't Boeing Use The 717 Designation Earlier? posted Fri Apr 20 2001 09:26:09 by LAX
Why Didn't CX Get The A340-500? posted Fri Mar 9 2001 23:44:04 by Hkg_clk
Why Didn't Concorde Abort The T/O? posted Wed Jul 26 2000 10:03:13 by CV990