Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Battle Of The X Planes On PBS Tonight  
User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16878 posts, RR: 51
Posted (11 years 8 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3921 times:

I just saw it and they will probably re-air it, amazing documentary about the X plane competition.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/xplanes/


Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCV990A From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1424 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 8 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3873 times:

Just as good, it's being followed by the Kee Bird story... Looks like PBS is a winner tonight...


Kittens Give Morbo Gas
User currently offlineSharpnfuzzy From Canada, joined Jun 2001, 570 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 8 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3862 times:

Yup, I watched it. It was really good, too bad they didn't make it a several part documentary... like the one they had about the 777.

User currently onlineCcrlR From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 2236 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 8 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3858 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I just saw it. It was cool. I liked the one about Air Force One and the 777 too.


"He was right, it is a screaming metal deathtrap!"-Cosmo (from the Fairly Oddparents)
User currently offlinePlanelover From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 321 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (11 years 8 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3844 times:

It was awesome! I only saw the first half though. Taped the rest and that b-29 thing after it. It was really good. From what I hear, Boeing and Lockheed woudn't allow NOVA to leave the buildings with the tape during the filming. They locked them up in a vault.  Nuts I agree though, it would have been better if it was longer.

I havn't seen the episode on the 777. Hope they will run a rerun soon.

Have fun all.  Smile
PL


User currently offlineSharpnfuzzy From Canada, joined Jun 2001, 570 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 8 months 14 hours ago) and read 3790 times:

Hey... does anyone think that asthetics had anything to do with the final descision?.. I mean the Boeing plane was ugly! I could just imagine enemy pilots scratching their heads trying to figure out what the hell the thing shooting at them is.

User currently offlineCloudy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 8 months 7 hours ago) and read 3710 times:

From what I've heard, there were two reasons.

1. Lockheeds version was allot closer to being a production design than Boeing's was. Lockheeds X plane was closer to the actual warfighting machine and so possed fewer risks of overruns, etc. This was no doubt the deciding factor.

2. Lockheed used more advanced tech for its lift-fan and ended up with a simpler, easier to maintain system with no need for either a second engine or Harrier-style thrust vectoring. Plus they ended up with more margin for weight growth than Boeing had. Until now - the geared lift fan has not been tried. Lockheed took a big gamble and won.

Usually, you have to make a choice between what's most advanced and whats most ready for production. In this case, Lockheed won on both counts. Once the lift-fan gamble was won - the case was closed. Boeing hadn't taken enough risks and so lost out big. There may be a lesson here for the commercial market....

Anyway......Aesthetics may have played a role. Boeing's design is actually more conservative than Lockheed's in some ways. It was Lockheed that took the biggest design risks. Yet it looks more wierd - and so APPEARS to be more risky. It is impossible for people to totally shake first impressions from their minds.


User currently offlineNight_Flight From United States of America, joined May 1999, 156 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (11 years 8 months 6 hours ago) and read 3683 times:

The program was great! Set your VCR's to record this hit.

It showed the pro's and con's of each aircraft, shared a little technical data, and followed the aircraft through the flight testing. They are the only planes able to hover, takeoff and land vertically and able to easily go supersonic.

It is curious that this information is not classified even thought the aircraft were X-planes.

-Night_Flight-



Remember when sex was safe and flying was dangerous?
User currently offlineDesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7780 posts, RR: 16
Reply 8, posted (11 years 8 months 3 hours ago) and read 3632 times:

What night was this supposed to air, Tuesday or Wednesday... b/c both of the PBS stations I get here weren't airing them. Which I suppose was a good thing b/c it would have torn me away from Enterprise.


Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
User currently offlineCloudy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (11 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3580 times:

I watched the whole program and I must admit I was incorrect.
The Lockheed bird does use thrust vectoring to some degree, though not to the extent that Boeing's does.

Also, Lockheeds "Lift Fan" is more complex and risky than Boeing's pure Harrier style model. The trade off is that it saves weight, is less hard on the surfaces it lands on, has less risk of ingesting it's own hot air (something that I am doing now - I am now eating the hot air I gave off with my last post  Smile ), and
it allows you to put the engine in a better place (The rear).

Despite the fact that Lockheed chose a more risky path to meeting the STOVL requirement, they managed to put out a bird much closer to a production version. They also had higher weight margins than Boeing's entry. This impressed the military, apparently.


User currently offlineSoontobepilot From United States of America, joined May 2000, 271 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (11 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3563 times:

Anyone know when the next showing of any of the PBS airplane shows are? I want to tape a bunch of them.

Also, is Dicovery Wings worth getting, and how do you go about getting it?

Thanks,
-soontobepilot


User currently offlineFlybulldog From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 369 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (11 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3551 times:

I don't think they replay the PBS shows very often - they want you to buy the VCR tapes. If you check your library, they may have a copy of the tapes.

I think you'll find that most of us here like the Discovery Wings channel. There's usually about 4 hours a week of very interesting shows repeated very often throughout the week. The biggest complaint is that there are too many shows repeated during the week.


User currently onlineHA_DC9 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 653 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (11 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3519 times:

The show about the 777 s really good. I bought the 3 tape VHS version for about $40 at my local Borders store. I bought the set a few years ago, but I think the set is still available in retail.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
History Of The Concorde On PBS Tonight (Jan18) posted Tue Jan 18 2005 20:53:50 by Ktliem@yvr
Battle Of The Airshows posted Sun Nov 20 2005 06:10:30 by Kaitak744
Impact Of The 787 On Global Markets posted Tue Apr 12 2005 00:03:34 by B707Stu
"Battle Of The Middleweights"..B787 Vs A350 posted Thu Mar 17 2005 08:14:31 by Jacobin777
US Plight Featured On PBS Tonight posted Tue Sep 14 2004 04:21:51 by AZjetgeek
Day 2 Of The Mess On The East Coast posted Tue Apr 13 2004 22:18:04 by Flairport
Battle Of The Midgets - 737 Vs. DC-9 posted Wed Mar 17 2004 23:23:39 by MakeMinesLax
Crash Of SwissAir 111 On PBS posted Wed Feb 18 2004 06:41:23 by Bobb
Crash Of Flight 111-ON PBS 2/17 posted Fri Feb 13 2004 04:16:47 by Neilalp
Battle Of The RJ's posted Sun Jan 4 2004 23:41:32 by 7574EVER