Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Virgin Blue Needs SIA's Permission To Fly Abroad!  
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13735 posts, RR: 19
Posted (11 years 2 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3373 times:

Virgin Blue does not have permission to use the Virgin Blue name outside of Australia.

Virgin Blue confirmed that the airline cannot fly outside Australia without the consent of Virgin Atlantic - 49% owned by Singapore Airlines Limited.

Singapore Airlines made sure the clause was in the contract in December 2002 (when the former bought 49% of Virgin Atlantic Holdings) to avoid confusion of the two airlines using the same word in their names.

Virgin Blue CEO David Huttner is in Singapore this week. He was there in part "to see if there is any way of seeking approval for us to use that name or if there is any other way to go about it."

More information at the href=http://www.nbr.co.nz/home/column_article.asp?id=5112&cid=8&cname=News>National Business Review (New Zealand) website


Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13735 posts, RR: 19
Reply 1, posted (11 years 2 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3366 times:

Information was gathered from the above hyperlinked webpage. Full information can be viewed by clicking the above hyperlinked webpage. Information was rephrased and not copied and pasted unlike others with the exception of quotes


Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4445 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3355 times:

If SIA owns only 49% of Virgin and Branson owns 51%, then SIA doesn't hold enough votes to override a Branson decision. If Virgin Blue can't operate outside of Australia due to it's name, why not change the name for your international services to Virgin Blue International or do some kind of name game?


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineDocpepz From Singapore, joined May 2001, 1968 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 3350 times:

But can't Branson, who owns 50.5% of VS, as compared to Singapore Airlines Limited - The World's Finest Airline - who owns 49.5% of VS, see to it that it gets through?

User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13735 posts, RR: 19
Reply 4, posted (11 years 2 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 3288 times:

Maybe it's a clause saying that it needs SIngapore Airlines Limited - Where Everyone Can Enjoy KrisWorld - The Biggest Show In The Sky - 's expressed permission to use the Virgin Blue name.

Otherwise - the enterprise-open Branson would probably have put this through by now.



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineOz777 From Australia, joined Jun 2000, 521 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (11 years 2 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 3186 times:

In fact the agreement relates to the use of the "Virgin" brand in countries where SQ has International services, not the pure use of "Virgin Blue".

It is not a matter of Branson owing more shares in VA, but a recognition that SQ has a substantial interest in the "Virgin" brand in relation to air transportation. Use by another airline, in which SQ has no interest, of the "Virgin" brand, typeface or colours, would be deemed to be "passing-off" in legal terms. This is a part of International Trade Mark/Copyright Law and is jealously guarded by the owners/licensees of the relevant 'Brand' or Trademark (Ask a few people who have used 'American' or 'Olympic' in their titles and branding and have been pursued by planeloads of lawyers).

Perhaps we may see "Pacific Star" yet!!!!

Oz777


User currently offlineQANTASforever From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 2 months 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3143 times:

Yeah - Independent 'Australian' Budget airline my ass!!!

geez.


User currently offlineBD1959 From Australia, joined Oct 2002, 450 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (11 years 2 months 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3104 times:

I'm not convinced that Branson would want to use the "Virgin Blue" name outside of Australia for a number of reasons:

1) The branding of Virgin Blue on red planes is a very Australian joke (and bloody ugly too if you ask me!)
2) The Virgin Blue brand is synonymous with LCC - think VB, think no inflight service (unless you want to fork out for inflated priced snacks)
3) VB have grown very successfully domestically on point-to-point services rather than an integrated network. This does not sit well with International Travel.

My guess is that we could expect to see a "Virgin Pacific" rather than either "Virgin Blue International" or "Pacific Star" - I guess that the use of Virgin in this title is the sticking point with SIA.

BD1959


User currently offlineMarara From Australia, joined Oct 2001, 678 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (11 years 2 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3037 times:

There has been talk of a 'Pacific Blue Airlines' on another board. Turns out the name is registered to the law firm that has worked on behalf of DJ before. hmmmm


I like work: it fascinates me. I can sit and look at it for hours. Jerome K Jerome
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13735 posts, RR: 19
Reply 9, posted (11 years 2 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2966 times:

A Singapore Straits Times article omitting the Singapore Airlines contract clause:

Virgin Blue to touch down in S'pore?
Aussie authorities likely to give nod for discount carrier to fly to the Republic, its first foreign destination, but no set date





Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineQantasAirways From Australia, joined Mar 2001, 1273 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (11 years 2 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2898 times:

That's extremely interesting that SIA wouldn't want DJ to use its name outside Australia - and perhaps a good thing.
My Virgin Blue experiences wouldn't guarantee my favour of an internation flight with them. Perhaps if the international flight was short, but this is difficult as australia is quite isolated.

I certainly would not choose a budget airline like Virgin Blue over Singapore Airlines, Qantas, Australian Airlines etc. etc. etc.

I think it would be better anyhow to use a new name, though, I can say that at this point in time I certainly would not fly DJ internationally

Regards
QantasAirways



Spirit of Australia
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Virgin Blue Says SIA Not Going To Buy Stake In It posted Fri Jun 28 2002 14:30:46 by Singapore_Air
Permission To Fly To USA? Difficult? posted Fri Sep 15 2006 15:09:32 by QatarA340
Virgin Blue 50th 737 Inbound To LIH posted Thu Jul 28 2005 21:00:14 by Clickhappy
Bangladeshi Carrier Gets Rights To Fly Abroad posted Tue Jan 6 2004 16:36:49 by Planemannyc
Indian Govt Allows Pvt Airlines To Fly Abroad posted Tue Oct 21 2003 19:55:22 by Behramjee
SIA Wants To Fly SYD - LAX, MEL - AKL - U.S.A. posted Sun Aug 31 2003 01:42:45 by Singapore_Air
El-Al Refused Permission To Fly To US posted Thu Sep 13 2001 21:48:44 by Toda,Reisinger
Virgin Blue Will Be Sold To Ansett For $250M! posted Tue Sep 4 2001 12:53:59 by Zanadou
Virgin Blue To Fly SYD - LAX posted Wed Jul 7 2004 01:09:37 by Qantaspower
SIA To Buy Stake In Virgin Blue-ING posted Tue Jun 11 2002 12:18:14 by Wirraway