Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
NWA 767 And 777?  
User currently offline777d From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 300 posts, RR: 1
Posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4364 times:

I am curious why didn't NWA look into the 767 and 777?

It would seem that these two types would perfectly into there fleet.

They could use 767 and 777 variants to replace their older 747's and DC-10's.

They would have the combination of 777 and 747 on their Asian routes and have 767s on domestics and Hawaii routes.

Also the 767/777 on their European network.

To seem it would have seemed a no brainer since they have flown Boeing metal for many years across the Pacific.

Did NWA approach Boeing regarding this issue?


Thanks



48 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineTrvlr From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4430 posts, RR: 22
Reply 1, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4352 times:

Most likely NWA did approach Boeing about the 767/777. Airbus just won the order instead of Boeing.

Aaron G.


User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 2, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4313 times:

Look for NWA to order the A340 sometime this year... You heard it here first.

User currently offlineAA61hvy From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 13977 posts, RR: 57
Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4317 times:

I thought NW debated between the A330 and 777


Go big or go home
User currently offlineUSAIRWAYS321 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1837 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 4276 times:

By Maizblu_757's logic...Look for many airlines to order many planes within the next 5 years...you heard it from me first :p

 Smile/happy/getting dizzy Smile/happy/getting dizzy Smile/happy/getting dizzyUSAIRWAYS321 Smile/happy/getting dizzy Smile/happy/getting dizzy Smile/happy/getting dizzy


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16345 posts, RR: 86
Reply 5, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 4266 times:

Search around... there's a detailed explanation of why they chose the A330 and not the 767 and 777 from not too terribly long ago.

NW is a huge cargo carrier and one of the requirements was a 20t cargo along with about 300 pax and bags on transatlantic runs. The 767 would certainly not fit that bill and the 777 would be overkill.

The biggest straw was that their A333 order could be converted to A332s if they needed. If they had gone with the 772, and needed to downsize the gauge, they would have also had to order 767s - a whole different fleet type. Arguably, not a good idea.

N

[Edited 2003-02-18 01:10:24]

User currently offlineUnited777 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1657 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 4213 times:

I could see NWA getting some A346 aircraft in the next two-three years.
I think NWA should be an all airbus fleet except the 744's. Instead of the 753 they should ordered the A321.


User currently offline9V-SVC From Singapore, joined Oct 2001, 1795 posts, RR: 10
Reply 7, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 4207 times:

Besides A330 is a newer aircraft then the 767 . The common cockpit with the A320 is a big plus too .


Airliners is the wings of my life.
User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7364 posts, RR: 28
Reply 8, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 4197 times:

Read this thread here http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1008934/ for more information.

You can argue all you want, but each carrier has their reasoning behind why they choose the product that they did. Each carrier doesn't have to operate the same aircraft. It all comes down to the needs of each airline, the capability of the aircraft, and the price determined by the seller.

As for ordering A340's??? Not anytime soon? A carrier that is deep in debt and needs to cut $1.5 Billion from annual costs isn't about to embark on new capital expenditures such as the A340.


User currently offlineAq737 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 612 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 4196 times:

United 777- the 321 is a competitor for the Boeing 737-900, not the 757-300. If you had to compare it to a 757, you would compare it to a 752, not -300. The -300 is a much larger aircraft and is used to replace the DC-10-40s on domestic routes, and then the DC-10-30s on Domestic, while the 330s will replace the DC-10-30s on Atlantic.

Basically, on a one-for-one basis, the 330 will replace a DC-10-30. The DC-10-30 will then replace a DC-10-40 on domestic and Hawaii. Then a 753 will then replace the DC-10-30.

Aq737


User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Reply 10, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 4174 times:

Northwest got very, VERY sweet deals from Airbus and at the time that it had placed a massive order for narrow bodies, the 737-NG family was years away from becoming reality. That's also why UA ordered the A320 family in 1992 as opposed to 737's. The A320/A319 are the backbone of the NW domestic fleet and pilot commonality is a big reason. It's interesting though that NW and its European partner, KLM have very little fleet commonality. True, they both are operators of the 747-400's but they could achieve greater efficiencies in term of shared maintenance had they tried to build similar fleets.

ContinentalEWR


User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7364 posts, RR: 28
Reply 11, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 4166 times:

For KLM & NW to share maintenance, it really wouldn't make that big a difference except anywhere but their long-haul aircraft. It doesn't matter what you are flying domestically when your aircraft are on a different continent.

User currently offlineHlywdCatft From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5321 posts, RR: 7
Reply 12, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 4164 times:

Maizenblu is this just a guess, or do you have some reasonable proof that they will order it?

I have heard they want to get the 777 too, but I haven't heard anything for fact.

Oh... while we are at it... I gotta meet the weekly quota for THIS too often asked question. what will Northwest replace their DC-9s with?


User currently offlineBrianhames From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 795 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4151 times:

The 777 would look super sexy in NWA colors...

User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16345 posts, RR: 86
Reply 14, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4145 times:

I think it'd be very entertaining if they got 777s at this point. It'd make absolutely no sense given their current fleet plan.

They said they'd study the 772LR and 773ER vs the A345 and A346, but that the 772ER had no chance.

KLM will also be operating the A330... so, since that's gonna be NW's primary transatlantic fleet type, it will work out just fine. KLM will be able to maintain them if need be.

Hah and since I think reducing total numbers of different fleets is important, I'll weigh in with my weekly vote for the A318, but wouldn't cry if they got the 717.

N


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4126 times:

Look for NWA to order the A340 sometime this year

For an airline which is in need of $1500000000 in price cuts, and who is a sucker for PW engines.........
well, I hope you're not holding your breath.



The DC-10-30 will then replace a DC-10-40 on domestic and Hawaii. Then a 753 will then replace the DC-10-30

NW's 753s will not be replacing D10-30s to Hawaii as the 753s are not certified to the proper ETOPS specifications and lack the range to reach HNL from some of NW's nonstop origin airfields.



User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4107 times:

They said *** that the 772ER had no chance.

They didnt say this... they said the 772ER would have been overkill for their Atlantic operations.

NW's apparent disinterested in the A343 (which they cancelled/converted) combined with the fact that KL is to begin operating GE-powered 772ERs (and potentially either of the 777NGs in the future) actually gives the 777 a significant chance with NW........ though I wonder if mass teleportation will be perfected before they actually make another new fleet decision  Sad


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16345 posts, RR: 86
Reply 17, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4111 times:

While Concordeboy brings up two excellent points, the first could go either way.

Neither the pretty new 777s or the pretty new A340s offer Pratt engines.

The A340 is, however, the only of the two without an exclusive engine contract. PW _could_ develop an engine for the A345 and A346. It just remains to be seen if they will.

Honestly, I think PW should shake off the drawings for the PW4173 and get that out there too, but they sure haven't called to ask me for my opinion.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

N


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4061 times:

PW _could_ develop an engine for the A345 and A346

PW also could offer the PW4098 on a 772ER... but no airline has thus far ordered that option as opposed to switching in favor of the GE90.

With 196,000lbs of thrust pushing their birds; NW could have the most powerful (and theoretically longest-ranged) 772ERs in the world should they opt for that route.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16345 posts, RR: 86
Reply 19, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4056 times:

Which leads to the question of what's wrong with the PW4098 that makes people not want to order it?

It may just be that no big Pratt customers have placed new orders for 777s lately.

N


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4024 times:

Actually... all 777 customers except BA, LY, and KE have flocked to the GE90 to satisfy their >92,000lb thrust needs; so there may not be anything in particular wrong with that type.

Also, no new carrier (that I can think of anyway) have chosen PW since the 777NGs have been available. All such carriers that PW has consulted about a PW4098-powered 772ER have either been past customers (NH, UA) or new potentials who chose otherwise (LA).


User currently offlineDynkrisolo From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1848 posts, RR: 8
Reply 21, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4013 times:

ConcordeBoy:

You forgot VN.


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3980 times:

ConcordeBoy: You forgot VN

Actually, I didnt.... chose to exclude them because they'd have been a moot example to the point I was trying to make: even though they did choose the PW4090 recently, they also chose the GE90-94B right alongside it to do their transpacific and longer-longhaul work.


User currently offlineUSAIRWAYS321 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 1837 posts, RR: 9
Reply 23, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3901 times:

Glad to support, I'm here anytime for your convenience.

 Smile/happy/getting dizzy Smile/happy/getting dizzy Smile/happy/getting dizzyUSAIRWAYS321 Smile/happy/getting dizzy Smile/happy/getting dizzy Smile/happy/getting dizzy


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16345 posts, RR: 86
Reply 24, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3895 times:

Anyone that thinks its impossible for NW to get A340's is cuckoo for cocoa puffs.

Anyone that thinks it may not be soon, is probably right.

N


25 Post contains images USAIRWAYS321 : I never said it's impossible, it actually is fairly likely eventually, but not anytime this year. USAIRWAYS321
26 Maiznblu_757 : Yea, according to my prediction, it said they will announce it this year. It will not be flying for NWA until about 06.
27 Post contains images USAIRWAYS321 : I still don't think it will happen. I don't feel that any airline is in a position to announce a substantial order except maybe Southwest or AirTran.
28 Gigneil : Just because I enjoy speculation like this... What sorts of A340s does youir prediction forecast, Maiznblu? N
29 Post contains images Maiznblu_757 : Its kinda foggy, but, I think that its looking like the A340-300.
30 Gigneil : Whoa. You are kidding, right? N
31 HlywdCatft : I wouldn't doubt NW getting the A340 eventually and maybe also the 777 for Trans Pac flights to replace *Groan... another weekly discussion* the 742s
32 Gigneil : Why would they get the A340 and the 777? N
33 Post contains images XFSUgimpLB41X : "Look for NWA to order the A340 sometime this year... You heard it here first" Seems as though I heard that in the early 90's... sorry.. they beat you
34 Maiznblu_757 : Well, they cancelled that order. This is the 2nd coming. This time they will follow through.
35 Post contains images ConcordeBoy : Well, they cancelled that order. This is the 2nd coming. This time they will follow through. What makes you so sure: The A343's lack of competitive th
36 Gigneil : Heh its hardly "hefty overweightiness". And the plane is more efficient than targeted, so its meeting all its performance expectations. The A345's sal
37 Airbus Lover : Aahhh our weekly NWA fleet replacement post!!! and somehow related to why they didnt choose Boeing over Airbus... well.. I aint saying anything!
38 ConcordeBoy : The A345's sales are brisk compared to the 772LR's. Actually, if you'll look at the 13 sales to actual airlines over the 6 years the A345's been avail
39 Raggi : Concordeboy, since when did VN order the GE90-94B? raggi
40 Dynkrisolo : Raggi: VN didn't order the GE90 per se, but they are leasing two 772ERs from ILFC with the GE90 engine. VN's first 772ER will be from ILFC.
41 Raggi : okey, thanx! I don`t see why they didn`t get them all with the GE90-94B instead of the clearly less capable Pratt. well, well raggi
42 Dynkrisolo : It's simple! Money talks!
43 ConcordeBoy : I don`t see why they didn`t get them all with the GE90-94B instead of the clearly less capable Pratt. NRT and CDG are also to be major 777 routes for
44 HlywdCatft : **Why would they get the A340 and the 777?** Ask Singapore, Air France, Cathay why they did A340s for longer range European routes and mideast if they
45 B-HOP : SQ is dumping 343. Concordeboy: - I know you get very excited about 772LR and GE engines, but please, don't hard sell it here.
46 Post contains images ConcordeBoy : yeah, I just cant stop; ya know, since everyone who chats on airliners.net is in the market to buy one....
47 Donder10 : Even the Airbus site says that the 343 is designed for routes over 5,000miles or so!Flying it from MAD/ATH/IST to LHR can't be too efficient.
48 ConcordeBoy : Ask Singapore, Air France, Cathay why they did Dont forget EK and CA
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Winglets Now On 767 And 777 posted Tue Nov 16 2004 00:53:02 by Erj145lr
Boeing 767 And 777 Gear? posted Tue Apr 13 2004 18:40:00 by Max777
UA 767 And 777 At PHL posted Fri Jun 13 2003 03:30:27 by Wagz
767 And 777 Operators posted Tue Jul 31 2001 11:24:15 by Rendezvous
Headrests On Delta 767-400ER And 777-200ER posted Wed Oct 25 2006 20:31:42 by 1337Delta764
Headrests On Delta 767-400ERs And 777-200ERs posted Tue Jan 3 2006 01:54:07 by 1337Delta764
767-400 And 777-200...any Major Difference? posted Sun Jul 28 2002 05:28:13 by FSPilot747
Will There Be 767-500 And 777-400 posted Fri Jan 5 2001 04:08:25 by MattNZ
NWA And 777? posted Mon Oct 23 2000 02:37:49 by Mace_2
Air Europe Gives The 767 And The 777 The Boot! posted Fri Aug 11 2000 16:47:40 by Avion