Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Very Interesting Article On SwissAir 111  
User currently offlineCoRocks From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1215 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2820 times:

This is a very detailed, informative article on SwissAir 111 and the Entertainment System manufacturer.

http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/2003-02-17-swissair.htm

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDelta-flyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2676 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (11 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2734 times:

This is really fascinating.

One thing that the article does not mention is the extremely complex, technical challenge of designing airborne systems. Even a mundane, nonessential system like an IFE still requires all the standards and procedures used for designing much more critical systems. The article bandies about the word "incompetence" quite a bit, as if it were so easy to find really competent people who could work in this industry.

One thing I have taken away from this article is.....don't trust companies who have to use "beltway bandits" to hawk their products!

Pete


User currently offlineMD-11 forever From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (11 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2673 times:

Well Delta-flyer, your statement about competent people irritates me a bit.... At the end of the day, the whole thing got an FAA approval. Does your statement imply, that even there are not all people competent?
This accident is in my opinion a showcase who illustrates, that there is never only one mistake or malfunction leading to a disaster. It always takes several things.
I'll never forget this day, when I heard the news that an airplane of "my" company crashed! Only the ones who experienced this may have an idea what I am talking about........


User currently offlineSwissgabe From Switzerland, joined Jan 2000, 5266 posts, RR: 32
Reply 3, posted (11 years 7 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 2597 times:

First they say it was a Jumbo Jet and later they go for MD11. It was an MD11 (HB-IWF) which crashed, not a Jumbo Jet (747) but maybe TWA800 was part of the confusion.

I also fully agree to "MD-11 forever" ...



Smooth as silk - Royal Orchid Service /// Suid-Afrikaanse Lugdiens - Springbok
User currently offlineAviationMaster From Switzerland, joined Oct 1999, 2481 posts, RR: 34
Reply 4, posted (11 years 7 months 1 week 2 days ago) and read 2560 times:

Like MD-11 forever said, this IFE got an FAA approval, so I think this disaster could have been avoided had the FAA and also Swissair looked at the system more carefully.

-Christian


User currently offlineBackfire From Germany, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2530 times:

First they say it was a Jumbo Jet and later they go for MD11. It was an MD11 (HB-IWF) which crashed, not a Jumbo Jet (747) but maybe TWA800 was part of the confusion.


Jumbo Jet is a generic name for any widebody aircraft. It's been associated with the 747 but I've seen it applied to everything from the L-1011 to the DC-10 to the MD-11. It's a bit presumptive to assume that, in such an in-depth article, someone confused two completely different accidents...


User currently offlineMD-11 forever From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2496 times:

Finally I could find some time to read the whole report. It is very interesting, and well researched. What makes one wonder is the fact, that the FAA obviously knew about the bad business behaviours of some parties involved to this sad story. I wonder why they didn't check the certification process more in depth as it seems to be appropriate when one handles such a complex STC issue. As far as I know about FAA certification rules, the last signature comes from the FAA itself, not from any outsourced FAA consultant or whatever.
Another issue are the findings that the Canadian Transportation Safety board made concerning wiring materials and insulation blankets. Also in thos cases, the FAA seems to have acted very unlucky and too late, although the dangers were known..........
Will be interesting to see what comes out when the court cases are dealt with!


User currently offlineTeva From France, joined Jan 2001, 1872 posts, RR: 15
Reply 7, posted (11 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2399 times:

this is a very interesting report.
that's what happens when people try to put profit in front of safety.
very sad
teva



Ecoute les orgues, Elles jouent pour toi...C'est le requiem pour un con
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Interesting Article On The Florida Market posted Sun Oct 15 2006 23:53:55 by JetBlueNYFL
Interesting Article On HA, AQ, And Mesa posted Tue Feb 28 2006 18:38:31 by HikesWithEyes
Interesting Article On MO And Wright Amendment posted Fri Oct 21 2005 16:28:19 by MrSTL
Interesting Article On NW/DL Bankruptcies posted Sun Sep 18 2005 12:20:54 by IRelayer
Interesting Article On Airbus' Leahy posted Wed Apr 13 2005 15:56:23 by LON-CHI
Interesting Article On Airlines Maybe Being To CHE posted Mon Nov 29 2004 20:14:55 by Luv2fly
Interesting Article On The SQ Super Long Haul posted Tue Jul 20 2004 07:41:47 by Rupesnz
Interesting Article On DFW's Low-fare Future posted Wed Apr 7 2004 06:39:29 by Ssides
Interesting Article On B6 posted Tue Mar 23 2004 22:35:36 by COEWRNJ
Very Interesting Reply On Flyertalk Fourm posted Sun Feb 22 2004 22:54:12 by Cmckeithen