Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
KAL 747 Crash Stansted 1999  
User currently offlinePositive rate From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 2143 posts, RR: 1
Posted (11 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3414 times:

What was the actual cause of the KAL 747-200 crash at Stansted airport in December 1999?? I don't recall any cause having ever been mentioned in the news and i'm wondering was it the cargo that caused it to explode??

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (11 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3354 times:

http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/special/hl7451/hl7451s.htm

Looks like the captain's ADI went tits up.


User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12322 posts, RR: 35
Reply 2, posted (11 years 1 month 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3191 times:

Yes, similar cause to AI 747 on New Year's day '78 (in fact, only a very few minutes into '78) - the ADI worked loose and the aircraft went into the water.

In the KAL accident, I don't think there was anything inherently dangerous about the cargo; it was carrying a substantial amount of fuel which would have caused the explosion on impact.


User currently offlineBackfire From Germany, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 1 month 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 3109 times:

As far as I'm aware there is no final report into this accident yet.

User currently offlinePositive rate From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 2143 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (11 years 1 month 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2999 times:

Shouldn't the captain have cross checked his ADI with the FO's ADI? If the crew knew the Captains ADI was "unreliable" then shouldn't they have been weary when it displayed differently to the FO's? This is why there are 2 ADI's fitted to IFR aircraft to prevent an accident if one fails.

User currently offlineKAL_LM From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 497 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2867 times:

Yes, he probably should have, but there were certain cultural infuences on the situation as well. Even if the captain had been wrong, the FO would not have said much, and even if he did the captain would have ignored him, because he was the captain. It is the whole senior/junior idea (and in KAL the whole military vs civilian) that seems to permeate Korean culture (I'm not an expert, I just work with them!). This puts a huge damper on crew communication and resource management. Also, this is why after the crash, a program was put into place at KE to hire ex-pat. pilots and to increase the number of civilian trained pilots and to start working the older military minded pilots out. So even if the FO had noticed that the ADI was wrong (which from what I gather he did and the FE as well) the Captain would have overidden them and their concerns, as he was the most senior man on-board and in control. Unfortunately we all know what happened.

(note: I'm not making any judgements, just relaying observations)

regards,
Tom



is that a light at the end of the tunnel or just a train?
User currently offlinePositive rate From Australia, joined Sep 2001, 2143 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 2836 times:

I understand what you are talking about! I've heard of those things within some carriers too. It just seems like such a waste to lose a 747 over something as mundane as an ADI fault! Imagine if that 747 had been carrying pax instead of freight???

User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (11 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2790 times:

It's all very well for someone to sit in an office and declare "crews should use CRM!" and "if THIS happens then do THIS." In reality, that doesn't happen. You ask a pilot "what do you do if your ADI fails" and they'll give you a straight answer. However, put them in a 747-200, 1000ft above the ground at take-off power in cloudy conditions and fail the PF's ADI, without any warnings, and you've seen what happens.

A good example of a similar situation was the British Midland 734 that crash a few metres from EMA, on the M1. The crew shut down the wrong engine! How rediculous! Yet it still happened. It's all very well to say "determin which engine hsa the problem and shut it down", but at 33000ft both crew are under a lot of stress. Mistakes, even major ones, are easy to make.


User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 7927 posts, RR: 54
Reply 8, posted (11 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2778 times:

The Air-India 747 that crashed near Mumbai a few minutes into New Year's Day 1978 was caused by disorientation, not a fault with the ADI. The captain was diabetic, had been drinking, and the entire flight profile was off. While in a turn, the captain got disorientated and mismanaged the controls. They rolled over and hit the water inverted. All the ADIs matched, and the comparator did not sound an alarm. Btw there are THREE independent ADIs onboard, one each for the main panels and one backup instrument on the centre panel. The reason a lot of attention was paid to the ADI theory is cos that is what the Captain thought had failed. He shouted something out to that effect, and the co-pilot, who hadn't been monitoring the instruments, looked down and saw his was showing an unusual attitude as well (which the captain had flown them into), and incorrectly drew the conclusion that his had failed too. The flight engineer could see what was going on the whole time and pointed at the centre panel, with the backup instrument. "No captain, look at this one." Too late.


fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
KAL 747-400 Near-crash Zig-zag Landing Video File. posted Fri Jan 11 2002 23:54:48 by Bobcat
747 Crash At Stansted! posted Wed Dec 22 1999 20:19:50 by Kaitak
Qantas 747 At Stansted posted Sun Jan 22 2006 22:00:28 by LHRneighbour
KAL 747 posted Thu Jun 2 2005 19:17:34 by Torch23
Air Atlanta 747 Crash At SHJ 7-Nov-2004 posted Sun Nov 7 2004 15:40:23 by IL76TD
Updated Info On Halifax 747 Crash posted Fri Oct 22 2004 21:15:30 by Frmyqr
China (Mandarin) MD11 Crash In 1999 posted Sun Apr 11 2004 16:23:53 by Pecoua
The Avianca 747 Crash In New York posted Fri Mar 12 2004 05:23:04 by Hugojimenez
Mandarin Air MD11 Crash In 1999 posted Wed Mar 3 2004 12:24:48 by Mika
First And Only Photo Of The KAL A300 Crash In '94? posted Thu Dec 4 2003 17:13:36 by Hoons90