Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
JetBlue LGB-ATL, FLL  
User currently offlineElwood64151 From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 2477 posts, RR: 6
Posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3886 times:

JetBlue To Connect LA/Long Beach And Atlanta, GA Three Times A Day

-- Low-fare Carrier Will Serve Seven Cities from Long Beach in May --
From Long Beach, JetBlue plans to serve Atlanta with three flights a day. The airline will also operate convenient connecting service to Atlanta from both Oakland, CA, near San Francisco, and Las Vegas, NV, via Long Beach.

"It's been more than a decade since there has been low-fare competition on the LA-Atlanta route," said David Neeleman, JetBlue's CEO. "As well as JetBlue's low fares, personal service and unique amenities, such as 24 channels of DIRECTV at every seat, we're looking forward to introducing Georgia travelers to the ease, simplicity and accessibility of Long Beach Airport. Once they try Long Beach they won't want to fly to LAX again."

The new nonstop service will complement the low-fare carrier's existing flights from Long Beach to New York City, Washington, D.C, Oakland, CA, Las Vegas, NV and Salt Lake City, UT and its newly announced service between Long Beach and Fort Lauderdale, FL, also scheduled to launch May 8. Last week, JetBlue announced plans to add a third daily service between Long Beach and Washington, DC, on May 1 and a seventh daily flight between Long Beach and New York/JFK starting June 26.

JetBlue has flown more than one million customers to/from Long Beach since the airline began serving the airport in August 2001. Located just 20 miles south of LAX, Long Beach Airport offers convenient access to downtown LA as well as all the region's major attractions.

The low-fare carrier is offering an introductory sale fare between Long Beach and Atlanta of $104* each way, or $99* each way if booked at www.jetblue.com. This sale fare, which requires a seven-day advance purchase, must be booked by May 8 and is valid for travel through June 25. Customers are encouraged to book early as seats are limited.

JetBlue's regular fares between Long Beach and Atlanta will range from $119* to $299* each way. Regular fares for connecting service between Oakland and Atlanta will range from $129* to $349* each way and between Las Vegas and Atlanta from $119* to $349* each way. All fares are discounted $5 each way if booked via JetBlue's web site, www.jetblue.com, by March 31.

JetBlue's daily schedules between Long Beach and Atlanta will be as follows:

Long Beach (LGB) to Atlanta (ATL) Atlanta to Long Beach
Depart - Arrive Depart - Arrive
7:00am - 2:00pm
11:45am - 7:00pm
9:50pm - 5:00am (next day) 7:05am - 8:55am
2:55pm - 4:45pm
7:55pm - 9:45pm


JetBlue is a low-fare, low-cost passenger airline, which provides high-quality customer service. Since launching operations in February 2000, the airline has carried more than 11 million passengers. JetBlue operates a fleet of 39 new Airbus A320 aircraft and is scheduled to place into service another 13 A320s by the end of 2003. All JetBlue aircraft feature roomy all-leather seats each equipped with free live satellite television, offering up to 24 channels of DIRECTV Programming at every seat.**

From its base at New York City's John F. Kennedy International Airport, JetBlue flies to: Fort Lauderdale, Fort Myers, Orlando, Tampa and West Palm Beach, FL; Buffalo, Rochester and Syracuse, NY; Long Beach, Oakland and Ontario, CA; Burlington, VT; Denver, CO; Las Vegas, NV; New Orleans, LA; Salt Lake City, UT; San Juan, Puerto Rico; and Seattle, WA. From Washington DC, the airline serves Fort Lauderdale, FL, and Long Beach and Oakland, CA.

With JetBlue, all seats are assigned, all travel is ticketless, all fares are one-way, and a Saturday night stay is never required. For more information, schedules and fares, please visit www.jetblue.com or call JetBlue reservations at 1-800-JETBLUE (538-2583). This press release, as well as past press releases, can be found on www.jetblue.com.

*Fares do not include Passenger Facility Charges of up to $9 each way, September 11th Security Fees of up to $5 each way and a Federal Segment Tax of $3 per segment

**DIRECTV® service is not available on flights between New York City and San Juan, Puerto Rico.


This press release contains statements of a forward-looking nature which represent our management's beliefs and assumptions concerning future events. Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are based on information currently available to us. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed in the forward looking statements due to many factors, including without limitation, our ability to implement our growth strategy and our dependence on the New York market, our fixed obligations and our limited operating history, seasonal fluctuations in our operating results, increases in maintenance costs, fuel prices and interest rates, our competitive environment, increased potential of war or hostilities in Iraq, the Middle East or other regions, our reliance on sole suppliers and one type of aircraft, government regulation, our failure to properly integrate LiveTV or enforce its patents, the loss of key personnel and potential problems with our workforce including work stoppages, and continuing changes in the airline industry following the September 11th terrorist attacks and the increased risk of future attacks. Additional information concerning these and other factors is contained in the Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including but not limited to, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this release.



MEDIA CONTACTS:

JetBlue Corporate Communications
718-709-3089


Source:http://www.jetblue.com/learnmore/pressDetail.asp?newsId=170


Over a decade since there has been low-fare competition in Atlanta-LA routes? What was Vanguard? Chopped liver? And Frontier? What about them?

Still, good news for people in ATL who lost their LCC routes to the west coast.


Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it in summer school.
31 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineWestjet_8 From Canada, joined Jan 2001, 451 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3828 times:

Already posted search for the old topic


Canadian. RIP 1999
User currently offlineFlyer732 From Namibia, joined Nov 1999, 1363 posts, RR: 22
Reply 2, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 3735 times:

Nonstop service, Vanguard and Frontier all stop.

jetBlue will have competition by the end of the year.....


User currently offlineScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 3716 times:

It's already old topic with the news of Jetblue few days ago for itself. So this is good news for jetBlue from ATL-LGB & FLL-LGB. I've can do try for fly on jetBlue for same day into the future. Well, catch ya later!

User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4490 posts, RR: 33
Reply 4, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3644 times:

THe only thread I could find on the search was a speculative one started by Srbmod on 2/7. There had been no announcement at that point. Good for JetBlue--yet another major market gets reasonably-priced transcon flights. This new route may put pressure on AirTran to make a decision about long-haul flights. Note the JetBlue is *not* starting ATL-New York--B6 apparently doesn't want to compete with AirTran.

What's the status of slots at LGB these days? I'd imagine that Mullin will have goon lawyers putting horses' heads in the beds of Long Beach city councilpeople the way AA did last year. He's not going to want to put Song planes on ATL-LAX and hurt yields for the mainline.

JetBlue seems to be settling on transcons and Florida as its two big growth areas. Sure, the highest and easiest yields are on these routes. But so is the wrath of the Cartel-network carriers. JetBlue would do well to resume building up some East coast and Midwest spokes from JFK, to diversify its traffic base. The network carriers aren't going to fight over CMH-JFK, CLE-JFK, MHT-JFK or MKE-JFK. These routes would produce dependable yields, if not the eye-popping yields that transcons and Florida can produce. JetBlue may well need these sorts of markets if Song proves successful.

Also, if JetBlue wants to be a major low-fare carrier, their hub strategy at uncongested airports gives them an excellent means by which to concentrate pax for connections. People Express built a solid high-volume connecting hub at the NYC market that would be there today if it weren't for the airline's bad management and Frontier purchase. JetBlue should not lose sight of the JFK hub goal articulated when they first went into business.

Jim


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3624 times:

Note the JetBlue is *not* starting ATL-New York--B6 apparently doesn't want to compete with AirTran.

I'd be inclined to say it has more to do with Delta upping ATL-JFK frequency by 500%, than any feelings of amnesty toward AirTran  Laugh out loud


User currently offlineFlyPNS1 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 6584 posts, RR: 24
Reply 6, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3593 times:

Here is the original thread about JBLU launching ATL-LGB.

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1028192/

It's very poorly titled, but it does relate to the topic.

I don't forsee DL launching any major campaign to get slots at LGB. In fact, JBLU is the one looking for more slots as they have already maxed out the number they have. Any future growth for LGB will require a larger allocation of slots.

DL currently has no plans to put Song in ATL. Even JBLU's recent announcement doesn't change that. If Song is successful and can inflict enough pain on JBLU in NYC, the ATL-LGB route won't be a big deal.

As for JFK, it's not exactly an uncongested airport. In the late afternoon and evening, JFK is extremely crowded. The rest of day it's not so crowded, but with future growth by AA,DL and JBLU, it's likely that JBLU will become a much more congested place to do business.


User currently offlineOuboy79 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 4567 posts, RR: 23
Reply 7, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3596 times:

Ahhh Mr. Cartel is back with the same old "cartel-network" rubbish. JetBlue's benchmark in the past has been the ability to fill 2 A-320s a day before they'll commit to a route. JetBlue is going to remain building up these longer routes and connecting the points to increase revenue and maintain relatively low costs. As soon as they get into markets like CMH, CLE, and MHT - they are shorting their stage lengths and running into massive competition...in the end raising their costs. Will they ever be in those shorter haul markets? Probably...but not until they have plenty of long haul routes to make up for losses on the shorter routes. Besides...they need to be concerned with Song taking off in 2 months and the effects that may have.

User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4490 posts, RR: 33
Reply 8, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 3532 times:

It's unclear if there are any points to O's post, but it's worth untangling anyway.

Ahhh Mr. Cartel is back with the same old "cartel-network" rubbish. JetBlue's benchmark in the past has been the ability to fill 2 A-320s a day before they'll commit to a route.

All of these routes would support two or more A320's a day if history is a worthwhile guide. Your point?

JetBlue is going to remain building up these longer routes and connecting the points to increase revenue and maintain relatively low costs.

THey've got a passel of long routes and will keep adding more, which will keep downward pressure on their costs. Your point?

As soon as they get into markets like CMH, CLE, and MHT - they are shorting their stage lengths and running into massive competition...in the end raising their costs.

There's more to life as a carrier with 400-plane ambitions than long stage lengths. There's depth and breadth of market distribution to think about, and that means some shorter stage lengths. And what "massive competition" will they encounter, at say, CMH? At BUF, ROC, SYR, and BTV, the cartel-network carriers didn't respond at all. There's a good possibility they wouldn't bother at other short-to-medium stage markets either. Your point?

Will they ever be in those shorter haul markets? Probably...but not until they have plenty of long haul routes to make up for losses on the shorter routes.

Lower profit margins on some routes aren't losses. It would not make sense for JetBlue to serve a market where they couldn't make a profit. Again, big-airline ambitions aren't built on the easy yields alone. Your point?

Besides...they need to be concerned with Song taking off in 2 months and the effects that may have.

Which may include....fewer people flying JetBlue to Florida. JetBlue may find it needs to redistribute some planes. I for one hope not, would love to see them spank Song. But the likelier possibility is that both airlines emerge as strong competitors on the Northeast-Florida corridor, with JetBlue perhaps a little smaller in the market than it is now.

Jim



User currently onlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32620 posts, RR: 72
Reply 9, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 3521 times:

Which may include....fewer people flying JetBlue to Florida. JetBlue may find it needs to redistribute some planes. I for one hope not, would love to see them spank Song. But the likelier possibility is that both airlines emerge as strong competitors on the Northeast-Florida corridor, with JetBlue perhaps a little smaller in the market than it is now.

If any market can handle overcapacity, it is NYC-Florida, lucky for both jetBlue and Song. jetBlue just added four extra FLL-JFK frequencies in the past two weeks for a total of 14 daily round-trips, some leaving within 30 minutes of each other. They succsessfully co-exist with Delta's 14 (I think it is 14, maybe a little less) daily FLL-NYC flights, though DL splits them between all four airports. Song will most likely not pull loyal B6 fliers, IMHO. However, everything else is up in the air. For Delta FF'ers and other high mileage folks, Song offers a huge advantage and I cannot see why they would not choose Song over jetBlue, but for the average consumer that just want's to get from New York to Florida and visa-versa, it will come down to price.

Another advantage jetBlue has over Song is it's connections from BUF, SYR, ROC, and BTV. Though Song does counter because they will offer non-stop service form DL / KBDL), USA - Connecticut">BDL, BOS, WAS, and three major NYC airports, whereareas jetBlue only has FLL-IAD. Also rumours are that jetBlue is looking at a Caribbean build-up from FLL. That has been on the rumour board for a long time with little having come from it, but I think FLL-SJU will be reality by winter. I think jetBlue could do well offering services FLL-AUA and -POS, because those are markets that have high O&D and good business traffic from the area with ridiculously high fares. jetBlue has publicly mentioned Aruba has a possibility, but that was before they decided on the LGB build-up.

I also hear that Song is not just about NE-FL. It will also be about California-Florida (FLL/MCO/TPA-LAX/OAK). Things will get interesting, but I feel both will be able to coexist and prosper.



a.
User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 3508 times:

Of course, an interesting issue would be if Southwest decided to offer LAX-FLL non-stop service as well...slowly but surely jetBlue is stepping on WN's toes, and at some point it's going to impact both carriers.

Steve


User currently onlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32620 posts, RR: 72
Reply 11, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 3494 times:

Of course, an interesting issue would be if Southwest decided to offer LAX-FLL non-stop service as well...slowly but surely jetBlue is stepping on WN's toes, and at some point it's going to impact both carriers.

Yes, very intersting. I have a feeling that if WN takes thier trans-con plans outside of BWI, than either FLL or TPA will be next. And WN just six weeks ago moved into thier all-new and expanded terminal space at FLL at T1, right next door to jetBlue.



a.
User currently offlineScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 3475 times:

Mark,

Where did you hear about Jetblue was rumors going nonstop from FLL-AUA/POS flight into the future? It's could be get do very well for the expanded more passengers for after recovery by Sept 11. I surely hope that chance ever had new nonstop from FLL-LAX for SWA and directly by the one-stop into MSY connecting to LAX. I was there with the new concourse B from six weeks ago of January 6, 2003 for the party at grand opening. We do had a very wonderful time for everybody at the party. The new concourse B is great and see on the top with the screening. I do remember that one for 5 gates at SWA. Let's hope see how is thing doing at FLL. Well, catch ya later!

Regards!


User currently onlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32620 posts, RR: 72
Reply 13, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3442 times:

There are no rumours of FLL-POS, I just think it could do well because Port of Spain is a lucrative market with a lot of high-yield traffic and AA and BWIA charge fares that are through the roof from MIA.

Neelman discussed the possibility of Aruba in a Miami Herald article that was published back in the spring of 2001.



a.
User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3344 times:

About Delta upping ATL-JFK, nearly all of Delta's flights are with RJs, so really all Delta is doing is adding frequencies of little consequence in terms of capacity. JetBlue could come in with 3-4 flights a day ATL-JFK and have nearly as much capacity on those flights as the RJs Delta Connection is flying on the route. AirTran doesn't even fly into JFK, they only fly into LGA and EWR, so JetBlue really couldn't even be considered a competitor to AirTran if JetBlue were to start ATL-JFK flights (I'll even go as far to say that JetBlue will start ATL-JFK flights by Oct. 1, 2003, if not earlier).

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3298 times:

About Delta upping ATL-JFK, nearly all of Delta's flights are with RJs, so really all Delta is doing is adding frequencies of little consequence in terms of capacity

Which is exactly what they needed to do in order to cater to the O&D between the two markets. Adding capacity would have aided transfer, not O&D, and I think we all know who has the transfer advantage in ATL....


User currently offlineJcxp15 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 997 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3283 times:

If JBLU really wanted to get at DL in a minor sense, they could definately start JFK-ATL service. I believe the A320's are cheaper to operate especially with JBLU than the RJ's with DL. Even with JBLU making little or no profit on such a route, they can really tear into DL sales. I mean, I don't know if it's in their best interest to operate a route if they make little or no money, but there is a lot of O & D from NYC to ATL, and if JBLU wanted to start such a route and charge extremely low fares, it would take a lot of O & D traffic away from DL.
There are some negatives to this though. Firstly, JBLU is out of JFK. Chances are the business traveler going from NYC to ATL would rather fly out of LGA than JFK, and therefore might choose DL. The business traveler probably also has FF miles on DL. Also, if you notice DL operates large aircraft every hour to LGA from ATL, where as from JFK to ATL (*and vice versa), they operate like 3 connecting international aircraft (763's), or CRJ's. It'd be interesting to see how many people would schlep to JFK for a lower fare (I guess it'd depend on how much cheaper JBLU could offer the fare).

JBLU can really capitalize on JFK-ATL service by adding some ATL-Carribean routes IMHO. (i.e. San Juan, or the Dominican Republic). If they can manage to charge a cheaper fare than DL or AA from NYC to the Carribean, I guarantee a lot of the NYC hispanic population would go JBLU, and you also fill up JFK-ATL flights. You can also use the ATL-Carribean service for passengers connecting from LGB. The only problem there is that you go against AA at JFK with their flights to the carribean, and I don't know how wise it would be for JBLU to go at both AA and DL. I was on a DL 763 from LGA to ATL this summer, and probably 70% of the flight was connecting to San Juan P.R. That's only on a DL flight. I'm sure there are also many people going non-stop on AA from JFK to San Juan who wouldn't mind making a quick stop in ATL on a comfortable aircraft with DirecTV (only on the JFK-ATL I guess though) to save money. If JBLU can somehow make an ATL-Carribean flight profitable and keep the fares below it's competitors I think they could be really successful not just on JFK-ATL, but ATL-Carribean flights.
Anyway, any comments on if this could be a good or bad plan?


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 17, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3268 times:

jetBlue already flies JFK to San Juan...

I think they have significant Caribbean expansion potential, but I think they should do it from JFK to take on American, as they've already demonstrated they love to do.

If they went to ATL, I bet both Airtran and Delta would hop to right away to take care of it.

N


User currently offlineDCA-ROCguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 4490 posts, RR: 33
Reply 18, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3262 times:

I'd be inclined to say it has more to do with Delta upping ATL-JFK frequency by 500%, than any feelings of amnesty toward AirTran

How do you get the idea "feelings of amnesty towards AirTran" out of my phrase "probably doesn't want to compete with AirTran?," ConcordeBoy? I speculated that JetBlue doesn't want to compete with AirTran on ATL-New York low-fare market, for the (I thought) obvious reason that AirTran is established and has deeper pockets, and low-fare carriers have generally steered clear of direct competition. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

Jcxp15, JetBlue flights on ATL-SJU could certainly work if there's the leisure O & D potential you mention. JetBlue seems to be doing fine going up against AA's SJU service at JFK. If the leisure percentage of ATL-SJU is high, it would be less susceptible to DL's FF marketing and B6 could run a couple of 320's per day. As for JFK-ATL, some additional thoughts: the leisure percentage isn't nearly as dense on JFK-ATL as say JFK-FLL. The market has a higher percentage of business travelers, and B6 may not be eager to go up directly against DL and FL on such a route, esp. when FL serves LGA and B6 doesn't.

Jim


User currently offlineUN_B732 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 4289 posts, RR: 4
Reply 19, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3261 times:

Excuse me, but jetBlue's load factor into BTV is great.... Never been on a plan with oh.... less than 80% load factor, and they only have 2 A320s a day, we need more than that. What are the load factors with ROC, SYR, BUF and other short-range destinations.
-Transaero Boeing 737-200



What now?
User currently offlineDeltAirlines From United States of America, joined May 1999, 8894 posts, RR: 12
Reply 20, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3258 times:

I don't think JetBlue would be able to get the gates needed at ATL for that many new flights, especially at International Terminal E. Delta enjoys parking its widebodies at E, and DL needs pretty much every gate they have at ATL (they have around 100 gates; with about 600 daily mainline flights, they need these gates (6 turns a day/gate is a pretty good number).

Maybe when the new South Terminal opens in 2008 could we see that, but I'm sure Delta will be anxious to grab AirTran's 20 gates in C for expansion between now and then.

Jeff


User currently offlineJcxp15 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 997 posts, RR: 5
Reply 21, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 3250 times:

Jeff:

Yea that was going to be my next question... How is AirTran going to expand out of ATL? I heard they are at max capacity with gates, and I assume DL isn't going to hand over any of theirs (unless they're forced to)...

Also, what gate is JBLU going to come into? Are the flights going to be handled by B6 employees, or are they going to contract like AirTran or some other carrier to help out?

Thanks


User currently offlineSegmentKing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 3230 times:

actually another airline (not spirit) is looking at POS-FLL...

-n


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3212 times:

How do you get the idea "feelings of amnesty towards AirTran" out of my phrase "probably doesn't want to compete with AirTran?," ConcordeBoy?

Tell me, do you take everything in an absolutely literal sense (regardless of the context at hand) or just discussions about aircraft?




JBLU can really capitalize on JFK-ATL service by adding some ATL-Carribean routes IMHO

There are easier ways to commit suicide.....


User currently offlineJcxp15 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 997 posts, RR: 5
Reply 24, posted (11 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3198 times:

ConcordeBoy:

Care to explain.. I'm sure you would have said the same thing about B6 going into ATL...


25 Post contains images ConcordeBoy : I'm sure you would have said the same thing about B6 going into ATL... Actually, I do.... Kinda like what I said about WN at SFO
26 BR715-A1-30 : Maybe when the new South Terminal opens in 2008 could we see that, but I'm sure Delta will be anxious to grab AirTran's 20 gates in C for expansion be
27 FLAIRPORT : Where are JetBlues gates.... D or E. And Can't Delta just park some Comair/ASA planes at the ops center or whatever and run a bus to allow more space
28 Rumorboy : Actually Airtran has 26 gates. 22 on the C concourse and 4 on the D concourse. We are only using the 2 on D full time right now for Jet Connect and so
29 ScottysAir : Can you please answer me about which jetBlue gate is at the concourse? Please leave with the postings for me. ok? I'm just want to know about jetBlue
30 Rumorboy : probably D concourse
31 USAFHummer : FLL-SJU would be stepping into AA and Spirit's court...could two low fares and a major work on that route??? Greg
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
JetBlue To Reduce LGB-ATL To One Redeye Only! posted Sun Jul 20 2003 02:37:41 by IslandHopper
JetBlue, ATL-FLL, ATL-MCO, ATL-JFK (hypothetical) posted Sat May 31 2003 04:04:26 by FLAIRPORT
Jetblue In ATL=AirTran Codeshare To LGB? posted Tue Feb 25 2003 06:13:13 by Tu154m
Will Jetblue Add RIC-FLL/AUS-FLL? posted Thu Jan 19 2006 16:40:38 by InTheSky74
JetBlue 9504 JAX-FLL posted Thu Nov 25 2004 02:14:46 by Flairport
JetBlue Looking At FLL-EWR/ISP/NAS And MIA-JFK posted Sat Sep 18 2004 05:56:13 by MAH4546
Jetblue's LGB Hub Plans posted Thu May 20 2004 21:53:36 by Nycfuturepilot
DL ATL-FLL Now All Boeing 737 And 767! posted Mon Apr 5 2004 06:21:57 by Flairport
DL FLL-ATL-FLL In Jun posted Sat Feb 21 2004 06:43:05 by Flairport
DL Flight ATL-FLL-RSW-ATL posted Sun Feb 8 2004 06:19:22 by Flairport