Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Actual Pitch Measurments Of "suite Seats"  
User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (11 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2002 times:

Just wanted to see if there was anyone out there that knew the actual pitch measurements for the first class "suite seats" that are used by United, British Airways, Singapore, etc. I know they advertise that they fold out to 6'6", but I wanted to know what the actual pitch was.

I like to "dink" around with my own seating arrangements for a "fantasy airline", but haven't been able to figure out aircraft other than widebodies. Thanks.

Regards

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCF-CPI From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 991 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1996 times:

Off the top of my head, I believe UA was touting an 88" pitch for their suites, the others I don't know.

FYI, on all the Airbus aircraft and on Boeing narrowbodies, two windows = 38" (standard F class pitch), while for the 767 and 777 I believe two windows = 42" (possibly 41"). Often it's possible to get a feel for a given airline's pitch by using this as a reference when looking at interior pics.


User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (11 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1987 times:

Good numbers to remember--each Airbus window is 21.3", each Boeing narrowbody is 19.5". If you put the Suites in the herringbone fashion, it is 7 windows for two rows, 10 for three, and so on.

F L Y 7 7 7 U A L


User currently offlineCF-CPI From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 991 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1959 times:

If each Airbus window is 21.3", then two windows = 42.6" (duh) and then I stand corrected ..... their window spacing is more akin to the 767/777. Looks like I'll have to revise my thinking when I play amateur designer.

User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (11 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1948 times:

I assume when you guys are reffering to the windows being xx.x inches apart that it is just like the seat pitch. The back of one window to the back of the next window, correct?

User currently offlineCF-CPI From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 991 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1935 times:

Boeing nut, yes, we mean center to center, or back-to-back, same distance. It just means the distance from a given point on one window to the same point on the neighbouring one. So yes, it is a similar idea to the seat pitch.

User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 1927 times:

CF-CPI,

Thanks for the info, much appreciated. I was wondering because I was curious how many of these sleeper seats would have fit on United's older premium tri-class seating arrangement when they had 36 sleeper seats. Or even possibly an entire 744 with these seats. I was also curious how many could go on a narrowbody.

Regards


User currently offlineFLY777UAL From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4512 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (11 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1904 times:

On the old "OO" configuration of the 747-400 in United's fleet, there were two different configurations for the 36 FC cabin--18 seats, galley, and 18 more seats, as well as a straight 36 seats with the galley behind. The plan was to revert to the latter configuration with the Suites, installing 26 in the herringbone pattern until about 1/2 way between doors 1 and 2.

As for narrowbodies, if you want the herringbone pattern, and also taking into consideration room for galleys, crew rest facilities, closets, and lavs sufficient for long-haul flights, a 737-700 would be able to be equipped with 24 suites, two abreast. A 757 would have 40.

F L Y 7 7 7 U A L


User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (11 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1890 times:

FLY777UAL,

Oh thanks a lot man!! You took all the fun out of it for me!!  Laugh out loud Actually, thanks a lot for that info. By the way, would you happen to know what the pitch would be in the herringbone pattern for the narrow bodies?

Regards


User currently offlineCF-CPI From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 991 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (11 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1871 times:

Makes one wonder if all-suite 737s or 757s would be a viable entity transatlantic. I had the impression that a good fraction of transatlantic pax actually pay for premium class -if not F then certainly C.

User currently offlineBoeing nut From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (11 years 1 month 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1868 times:

My thoughts as well. My vision would be of a fleet of BBJ's and "BBJ3"s. (752LR) with the configurations mentioned by FLY777UAL's last post. But I'd still like to figure out arrangements for other aircraft as well.

Regards


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Actual "Pitch" Of First Class "Suite Seats" ? posted Fri Sep 23 2005 17:49:47 by Boeing Nut
"Leaders" Of Airline Alliances posted Thu Feb 15 2007 19:39:38 by 1337Delta764
Status Of "Puffer" Bomb Detectors? posted Tue Feb 13 2007 19:40:24 by DeltaDAWG
Documentary Of "Helios 522" On Discovery Wings posted Sat Feb 3 2007 02:42:44 by Dogfighter2111
New Series Of "Air Disaster" On Nat Geog. posted Fri Feb 2 2007 20:01:41 by Kaitak
Aboulafia's Book Review Of "Boeing Versus Airbus" posted Fri Dec 22 2006 09:04:03 by Leelaw
Southwest N363SW "Heroes Of The Heart" posted Sat Aug 12 2006 20:21:24 by Jakbar
Chances Of Y3 Being A "Sonic Cruiser" posted Thu Jul 20 2006 00:31:47 by Ruscoe
Chicago "Future Of Aviation Conference" posted Sun Jul 2 2006 01:02:16 by ORDTerminal1
Chances Of Getting The "new DL" Product On August? posted Wed Jun 21 2006 18:40:42 by Gokmengs