Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Bigger Aircraft Carrying Less Passengers  
User currently offlineTu144d From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 198 posts, RR: 2
Posted (11 years 6 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 1552 times:

I was looking at American Airlnes fleet page today it was evident that their "largest aircraft" in terms of passenger capacity was the A-300 and not the 777. The A-300 is configured for 251 passengers and the 777 for 224/245. I'm curious as to why the much larger 777 aircraft carries fewer passengers than the A-300. Is this to take advantage of extra cargo capacity?.

-Vikram-

[Edited 2003-03-01 00:08:22]

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN175dz From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2000, 274 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 6 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 1530 times:

It's all to do with cabin layout. AA's A300's have 16 First class seats at 40" pitch and the rest is coach. In contrast, AA's 777's (Atlantic Fleet) have 16 first class Flagship suite/bed, then 35 business seats at 60" pitch, then coach.

In short, there is more room taken up in the a/c by the premium cabins (i.e. less seats) in the 777's, leaving less room for coach seating.

Hope this helps.
Phil.


User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8706 posts, RR: 43
Reply 2, posted (11 years 6 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 1515 times:

In addition to what Phil posted: There's no need for crew rests (bunks) on an AA300 Big grin like it is on a 777. I don't know whether the AA 777 have bunks upstairs like DL's have, but I'm pretty sure more cabin space is needed for crew rests on the 777 than on the A300.


Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineFanofjets From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 1977 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (11 years 6 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 1468 times:

Often the bigger aircraft fly longer distances; the airline must sacrifice the weight of a more seats to accommodate extra fuel for the long flight. I even heard of people being bumped from trans-Pacific 744 flights because the airline needed to carry extra fuel to compensate for head winds.


The aeroplane has unveiled for us the true face of the earth. -Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
BA Aircraft Management / Less (1) 777 posted Tue Jul 15 2008 14:37:38 by BP1
Why Do Pilots Get Paid More For Bigger Aircraft? posted Mon Feb 19 2007 22:58:58 by Sacamojus
B762ER / Other Aircraft - Flap-less Take-off posted Tue May 9 2006 23:15:50 by Orlando666
Bigger Aircraft On Gulf Air Sydney-Cairo Route posted Thu Jun 9 2005 23:29:46 by GF-A330
Bigger Aircraft For Christmas / New Year Holidays posted Sat Dec 11 2004 23:36:31 by JoKeR
B777-300 Carrying 500 Passengers posted Mon Oct 13 2003 02:41:36 by Malot767
757-200 Carrying 389 Passengers? posted Sun Jun 2 2002 18:15:17 by A388
Less Passengers = More Comfort? posted Fri Oct 5 2001 14:45:08 by TR
AirTran And Bigger Aircraft posted Tue Jun 26 2001 15:30:11 by B777UA
Bigger Aircraft To ABQ posted Thu Mar 9 2000 02:42:21 by ABQ757