Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
JetBlue's Future A32X Orders  
User currently offlineDIA From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3273 posts, RR: 27
Posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 3271 times:

Just wondering what the latest news is with JetBlue's future orders.

Weren't they considering the A321?

Are they still recieving A320s on a steady basis? How many?


Ding! You are now free to keep supporting Frontier.
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGreg From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 3232 times:

They are/were pressuring Airbus to build the A320.5 with two more seat rows (to get it up to 738 size). So far, the response has been very cool.

It is my understanding they are sticking with only the 320...which apparently is only 'slightly' smaller in capacity than they would like.

My information is soley based on articles and interviews I've read about the carrier. No insider info.


User currently offlineDeltaMD11 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 1701 posts, RR: 34
Reply 2, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 3224 times:

B6 are receiving 2 A320's per month to my current knowledge, but that is old information (has to be a few months old), so maybe someone can update us on that. B6 wants Airbus to research what is known as the A320-500 series. The aircraft will basically be a lengthened A320. I think their point of view in this is that they do not want the capacity of the A320, but rather something with a few more seats and more range than an A320-200. More range? This is something that has posed a question in my mind too as they are able to complete JFK-LGB and SEA which is a pretty long haul for an A320. The only reasoning I could see in giving it extended range is that less stress would be put on the aircraft in that you can distibute the fuel to another tank within the aircraft instead of having the wings full to the brim, and if needed can extend their routes to some destinations in Canada and Mexico. I haven't heard anything on this issue as of recent though.

Bryan
Chat Operator Delta767



Too often we ... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. - John Fitzgerald Kennedy
User currently offlineDIA From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3273 posts, RR: 27
Reply 3, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 3181 times:

I asked about the A320.5 a few months ago on A.net and got a response saying that Airbus has formally said they will not build it, especially for just one airline. I didn't know Jetblue wanted increased range though. . .makes sense I guess.
DIA



Ding! You are now free to keep supporting Frontier.
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 4, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 3120 times:

I hadn't heard anything about increased range... the A320 already has industry leading range for that size class and I bet increasing it would be a little on the tough side.

Its not like jetBlue wants 150 of these new A320.5s, I bet they just want a handful. Airbus is staying the right course with this one.

N


User currently offlineScorpio From Belgium, joined Oct 2001, 5037 posts, RR: 44
Reply 5, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3055 times:

JetBlue currently operates 40 A320s, and by year-end the fleet will grow to 52. Total firm orders currently stand at 78, all A320s.

User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3013 times:

Why not take a page out of Easyjet's book and take out a lav so you can fit an extra few rows? Airbus does need to develop an aircraft that bridges the capacity gap between the A320 and the A321; Boeing has nearly got the gap between the 737 and the 757-200 bridged with the 737-900. I think there would be a broader market for the A320-500, not only from exsisting A320 customers, but also from A319 customers as well.

User currently offlineRacko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4857 posts, RR: 20
Reply 7, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2990 times:

I think once Airbus gets to developing a "NG" version of the A320 in some years (probably after the development of the A380 has finished in the last third of this decade), they'll make the A320 a bit bigger, probably up to the capacity of the B738. Until then, I doubt Airbus will move. After all, there currently is no need to come up with something new.

User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8018 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2825 times:

Hold it right there. Isn't the seating capacity of the A320 and 737-800 almost identical based on the standard Airbus and Boeing suggested seating configurations for these planes?

I still think B6 will likely order the higher MTOW A321 due to the fact they could use the larger plane on the JFK-FLL and JFK-LGB routes.


User currently offlineDeltaMD11 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 1701 posts, RR: 34
Reply 9, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2816 times:

No, the 737-800 seats about 20 more in a standard 2-class configuration.


Too often we ... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. - John Fitzgerald Kennedy
User currently offlineONT 737 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 590 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2717 times:

I was talking to an Airbus lobbyist in DC and asked him if they would consider making the A320.5 jetBlue has mentioned. He just replied "It depends on how many they are talking about." I would be suprised to see it actually happen though. But that is the least on my mind, I have a job interview with them on Monday  Big thumbs up


"The world is run by C students"-Harry Truman
User currently offlineCloudy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2653 times:

I suspect that two other reasons for not building the A320.5 in come in to play.

1. Airbus knows that Jetblue is pretty much locked in to the A320 series. Even Jetblue's orders for A320.5 will likely only come at the expense of the A320.

2.Airbus likely payed a considerable price to lock JetBlue in, by taking less of a profit per plane. They don't want to waste this money.

This is like Airtran and the 717-300. The main reason the 717-300 may be built and the 320.5 probably won't is that Airtran can credibly threaten to go to a competitor. And, as has been mentioned before, only Jetblue seems to want the 320.5 while there are many airlines who may order the 717 just because the -300 is available.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Future 737NG/A32X Orders posted Tue Dec 21 2004 19:51:21 by FCKC
JetBlue's Future Orders?Major LCC? posted Sat Mar 13 2004 16:08:35 by AirplanePeanut
Boeing A32X Orders posted Thu Aug 17 2006 16:15:39 by Flying-Tiger
Engine Selection Of Current And Future 787 Orders posted Mon Dec 19 2005 03:26:47 by 1337Delta764
JetBlue Future Cities? posted Sun Nov 20 2005 17:06:33 by InTheSky74
'Love' In Jetblue's Future? posted Wed Oct 12 2005 16:44:37 by Aaway
JetBlue Future OAK Plans? posted Wed Sep 21 2005 03:00:27 by InTheSky74
BA: Future Aircraft Orders posted Sat Mar 5 2005 07:45:00 by Scotron11
Future EMB Orders posted Mon Jul 12 2004 20:40:53 by Erikwilliam
Jetblue Future Locations posted Thu May 13 2004 01:29:04 by Airbus3801