Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
True Int. Into MHT  
User currently offlineDan6681 From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 91 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1411 times:

MHT has handled flights from Canada but we all know this requires no INS/ Customs procedures on arrival. With the runway expansions allowing heavy's and loaded narrow bodies on transcon. Will MHT be an international host in the future?


EWR-SIN 18.5hrs bring it on!
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUN_b732 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 4289 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1385 times:

Who knows?
-Transaero Boeing 737-200



What now?
User currently offlineJcxp15 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 997 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1357 times:

I doubt it. BOS is too close IMHO for MHT to really draw any international flights. Passengers coming from Canada will just clear customs before leaving (i.e. ala LGA style).

User currently offlineClrd2go From United States of America, joined Feb 2003, 1000 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1337 times:


There's been talk (not official) of perhaps some International charters,
and possibly Pan Am offering Caribbean service. Again, that's not official.
As I live about 15 minutes from MHT, I'd love to see Caribbean service.


Jim



What a long strange trip it's been
User currently offlineChrisNH From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 4165 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1321 times:

The 'major' international flag carriers won't come...they have a fixation on BOS, JFK, PHL, IAD et al. That's understandable. The carriers we could attract--and should be pitching to--are Monarch, Air 2000, JMC and all the other charter/holiday ones. These are the carriers that favor Sanford over Orlando, so asking them to favor Manchester over Boston is not a stretch at all.

Indeed, Manchester could be promoted as an alternative to Bangor for tech-stop purposes (to the extent that we have cheaper landing fees and overall costs). I believe, also, that Europeans wanting a ski holiday would do well to come here than 'simply' go to Switzerland. Even factoring in air fare, a trip 'all the way' to New Hampshire might well be less expensive than 'just' going to Switzerland--thanks to the value of the dollar for Europeans.

In order for this to work, we need a means of allowing these 757s, 767s, and A330s (aircraft of choice for these charter carriers) to dock at our beautiful terminal. Until the infrastructure is in place (read: customs/immigration), I believe such jets would have to pull in to the old Ammon Terminal...hardly a nice 'welcome to New Hampshire' for arriving passengers.

Yes, we'll have newly-opened Runway 17/35 at 9,250 feet this summer. But it is much more than the length of concrete that will get these charter carriers here. We need a gate that can be used for arriving jets (probably the end gate on the newly-extended 'A' pier so wingspan won't matter). Doesn't need to be a dedicated gate, because these charter flights would be few and far between. We also need the necessary barriers to funnel arriving passengers to a new processing center for customs/immigration. And we need the requisite personnel to handle all of this...probably on an as-needed basis because these flights would be sporadic. The mistake would be in trying to attract these charter carriers to Manchester without first setting the airport up for international arrivals/departures. Unless things have been going on behind the scenes relative to the above areas, I'm not sure we are there yet.

As for Pan Am, I applaud the concept of nonstop Caribbean flights on their 727s. Being Pan Am, I'll believe it when I see it. Even more to the point, I'll believe it when I see it last for a year or more. Pan Am has a propensity of being a 'here today/gone tomorrow' carrier, so it's not so much whether we attract them (yawn), it's whether they make a commitment. Ask Worcester, Gary, and even Portsmouth about Pan Am's 'commitment.' Nuff said.

Chris in NH


User currently offlineDeltAirlines From United States of America, joined May 1999, 8913 posts, RR: 12
Reply 5, posted (11 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1291 times:

As for Canadian flights, Air Canada has served MHT for the past few years, and passengers have always cleared customs at either YYZ or YUL. As for Caribbean charter ops, the flights in the past would have had to stop at BOS for clearence, then continue on to MHT.

As for a future INS component at MHT, when the build the new extension to Concourse B, I think MHT's administration will attempt to place an INS station down there.

Jeff-LGA/MHT


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Ghana Int Airlines Timetable Into DUS, LHR posted Thu Mar 24 2005 15:47:04 by Soups
Small, But True US Int'l Airports posted Sun Jul 11 2004 22:52:22 by Jetpixx
AS Int'l Flights Into SEA, Where's The Customs? posted Fri Mar 19 2004 16:22:44 by BCAInfoSys
Is It True Mig Jet Fighters Escort DL Into SVO? posted Sat Jan 31 2004 08:31:22 by ZASpringboks
Is It True You Cant Fly Vfr Into Miegs Anymore? posted Mon Oct 22 2001 00:23:00 by RC Pilot
RUMOR: New Airline Coming To MHT posted Fri Aug 28 2009 16:36:45 by Jawake
Miami Air Int'l To Cape Verde posted Tue Aug 25 2009 15:47:33 by Scxmechanic
International Airlines Into ALA (Almaty)? posted Tue Aug 25 2009 08:04:04 by KL1291
B787 First Flight : Late '09. Entry Into Service? posted Mon Aug 24 2009 04:16:15 by Keesje
BA Website Turning Into FR Website? posted Fri Aug 21 2009 12:39:08 by Sam1987