Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Delta ATL-LAX With The 777?  
User currently offlineSoku39 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 1797 posts, RR: 9
Posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 3915 times:

Just heard rumors once they pulled the MD-11 off the route they'd be using 777s. Just wondering if this was true.


The Ohio Player
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11151 posts, RR: 59
Reply 1, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 3904 times:

I don't see why not. It's the only aircraft that can fill in the role of the MD-11 on any route.

764ERs aren't quite as big. Either 777, or increase in frequencies on smaller aircraft.

Regards



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16345 posts, RR: 86
Reply 2, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 3875 times:

I'm not so sure they do operate 777s on the route. They no longer fly to Tokyo from LAX / KLAX), USA - California">LAX.

They're flying the MD-11s after they get them off the Atlantic, to replace 763s that are being reconfigured for International.

N

[Edited 2003-03-14 02:55:18]

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 3858 times:

764ERs aren't quite as big. Either 777, or increase in frequencies on smaller aircraft.

Actually, DL's 764ERs carry more people than their 772ERs... and were designed/bought for transcons  Big grin


User currently offlineFlyPNS1 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 6477 posts, RR: 24
Reply 4, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 3857 times:

764ERs aren't quite as big. Either 777, or increase in frequencies on smaller aircraft.

DL's 764ER's are actually bigger than the 777 because of the way DL configures them. 764's have a relatively small domestic F cabin and very large coach cabin and seat a total of 287 passengers. The 777's have a larger BE cabin and smaller coach cabin and they seat 277.

If DL configured the 777 the same way the 764 is configured, then indeed it would carry more passengers (300+). However, the 764's and 777's have different missions.


User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 3667 times:

Delta brought the 767-400 into service as a replacement for the L-1011s, which once the 777s came in, were put onto domestic service until their retirement. With the 777 being Delta's primary international service a/c (along with the 767-300), once the MD-11s are retired, you may see 777s on the ATL-LAX route, at least until Delta TechOps has 777 trained MX staff in LAX. For the most part, ATL-LAX will be with 767-400s. You will not see the 767-400 on any flights longer than East Coast-West Coast, because the airline and their pilots cannot agree on crew rest areas on the a/c. I think that if Continental can do flights to Europe using the 767-400, why can't Delta get their act together with their pilots and start using them on Transatlantic flights as well?

User currently offlinePanamair From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 4792 posts, RR: 25
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3587 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

You're not likely to see 777s on ATL-LAX for the forseeable future unless all international travel collapses due to the war or other reasons. DL only has 8 777s around and will not get any new ones until well into 2004. With the retirement of most of the MD11s, the 777s are needed for international flights and a few ATL-MCO runs. In addition, with the planned retirement of the last 3 MD11s in early 2004, ATL-NRT will have to be flown with the 777s (it will take up 3 of the 8 aircraft). Right now, for the summer schedule, ATL-LAX will have a combination of 767-300ERs, 767-300s, 767-400s, and a 757 or so. Some of the 763s will be the internationally-BizElite-configured a/c (these are the ones with flight numbers between 1 and 179 or between 1960 and 1999) while others will be domestic 763s (with F and Y cabins).

User currently offlineSoku39 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 1797 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 3535 times:

Oh I thought DL had more than 8 777s. so 763 or 4s it is.


The Ohio Player
User currently offlineDeltAirlines From United States of America, joined May 1999, 8867 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3517 times:

When is the next 777 scheduled for arrival? March 2004?

Jeff


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3415 times:

I think that if Continental can do flights to Europe using the 767-400, why can't Delta get their act together with their pilots and start using them on Transatlantic flights as well?

probably because DL never wanted to do that with them in the first place. The whole row between DL & DALPA was primarily because the latter would accept no less than BusinessElite seats for rest areas on flights longer than 7hr59min. Since DL had no intention of putting BizE seats in the 764ER, they chose to restrict the plane to flights shorter than that duration. The only route which suffered as a result was ATL-HNL, which had to be transferred to SLC  Sad


User currently offlineIndustrialPate From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 3332 times:

ConcordeBoy,

DFW-HNL was another casualty.

IMO, I don't believe DL wished to fly ATL/DFW-HNL anymore. ATL-HNL is about the same distance as ATL-LAX-HNL and according to DL's internal research, many (most?) passengers felt the ATL-HNL flight was too long and preferred a stop at LAX/SFO anyway. It probably makes more sense to DL (including economically) to launch their Hawaii flights from the West.

Interestingly, DL’s presence in Hawaii continues to shrink while the other majors continue to grow. DL now operates only two LAX-HNL, one LAX-OGG, one SFO-HNL and one SLC-HNL flights.



User currently offlineHlywdCatft From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5321 posts, RR: 7
Reply 11, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 3326 times:

What about Delta's 764s and MD-11s on the MCO-ATL routes? What is the difference in configuration?

Last summer I was supposed to fly an MD-11 from ATL-MCO, but it was replaced by a 764. When I booked the flight there were only 3-4 seats left on the MD-11 a month ahead so it was probably full by the time I was to fly. There didn't seem to be any problems at the gate.



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Upcoming Flight On Delta ATL-LAX posted Mon Apr 24 2006 00:52:54 by Ajiggity3
Asiana Adds LAX With A New 777 posted Tue Jan 24 2006 08:41:41 by HeeseokKoo
Delta's ATL-NRT To Be A 777 As Of 1/1/04 posted Mon May 5 2003 20:25:16 by Ord
Delta's Future With The Big Stuff posted Sun Sep 24 2000 20:17:22 by Delta777-XXX
Delta Adding 777 To ATL-LAX posted Tue Oct 14 2003 00:44:15 by Ord
What's Up With Delta And The 777-200 LR posted Fri Mar 22 2002 03:16:08 by Hawkeye2
Delta MSY-LAX. Southwest Missed The Boat. posted Sat Sep 23 2006 19:16:13 by MSYtristar
Delta & LAX: Back To The Future posted Tue Jul 25 2006 03:07:49 by Fewsolarge
Delta Flight ATL-LAX Full posted Tue Apr 25 2006 19:40:15 by ATLAaron
When Will Delta Stop With The Technical Stops? posted Sun Mar 12 2006 22:46:10 by Thegooddoctor
Upcoming Flight On Delta ATL-LAX posted Mon Apr 24 2006 00:52:54 by Ajiggity3
Asiana Adds LAX With A New 777 posted Tue Jan 24 2006 08:41:41 by HeeseokKoo
Delta's ATL-NRT To Be A 777 As Of 1/1/04 posted Mon May 5 2003 20:25:16 by Ord
Delta's Future With The Big Stuff posted Sun Sep 24 2000 20:17:22 by Delta777-XXX
Delta Adding 777 To ATL-LAX posted Tue Oct 14 2003 00:44:15 by Ord
What's Up With Delta And The 777-200 LR posted Fri Mar 22 2002 03:16:08 by Hawkeye2
Why Didn't Delta Stick With The Rotunda At JFK? posted Sat Feb 4 2012 07:22:16 by washingtonian