Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Now That's A Repulsive Airbus Commercial ...  
User currently offlineNoUFO From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 7916 posts, RR: 12
Posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 2790 times:

... but funny!  Big thumbs up
Mind the details, such as the appearance of the aircraft (are both of them actually Airbus'?), the child "crossing the border" at the end of the commercial and the embarrassment of one lonesome employee.

http://www.airbus.com/video/media/advertising/departure.mpg

Have phun, don't start a war.
NoUFO


I support the right to arm bears
22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 2638 times:

what a waste of advertisement money  Nuts

User currently offlineDanielbk From Israel, joined Feb 2003, 197 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 1 month 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 2619 times:

This ad is really a waste... (IMOH)..
does that look like EGLL?



cockpit? it's that little room in the front of the plane where the pilots seat.. but that's not important now
User currently offlineElwood64151 From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 2477 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2429 times:

Yeah. It's repulsive. Especially since some of us avoid Airbus like the plague. I've flown 7X7s, -9s and variants, and A3XXs, and I have to say I'd rather fly American because they're more comfortable and laid out better (at least in my experiences).

Sorry, Airbus, but I'll fly Boeing whenever I can!



Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it in summer school.
User currently offlineIlyushin96M From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2609 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 2416 times:

Nothing repulsive about it. It's just an ad. This thread is what's a waste of space.

User currently offlineBoeing4ever From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2390 times:

Nothing repulsive about it. It's just an ad. This thread is what's a waste of space.

He's allowed to have an opinion, and this forum is for discussing aviation. That is a commercial for an aviation company, so your rebuke of this thread is the real waste of space.

As for the commercial, I have no real opinion.

B4e-Forever New Frontiers


User currently offlineAq737 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 612 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2370 times:

There are a couple technical errors. First of all, why did they use an airbus airplane at the other airline's gate also? It gives an impression that their A300/310 line sucks! Next, the passengers board from a jetway, but board on stairs. I can see why they did this - to show off their plane, but it is not very accurate.

Aq737


User currently offlineAvroArrow From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 1045 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2349 times:

Yeah, multimillion dollar plane and a $100 commercial, but at least it was an aviation commercial, you don't get to see many of those from an actual manufacturer.


Give me a mile of road and I can take you a mile. Give me a mile of runway and I can show you the world.
User currently offlineIlyushin96M From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2609 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2336 times:

Funny response, Boeing4ever. "He's allowed to have an opinion, and this forum is for discussing aviation. That is a commercial for an aviation company, so your rebuke of this thread is the real waste of space."

So my opinion is invalid? Talk about double standards...


User currently offlineBrons2 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 2991 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2258 times:

What is the other plane supposed to be, the one at Gate 20? From the nose of it, looks like another Airbus! lol....


Firings, if well done, are good for employee morale.
User currently offlineNoUFO From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 7916 posts, RR: 12
Reply 10, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2150 times:

Exactly, Brons2 and Ag737, I really think it is just another Airbus with old-style engines (silver, no paint) and a yellowed fuselage. When you look closely, the plane appears as a duckling as if they have shorten the landing gear (most likely some computer work).
Maybe they have choosen another Airbus to avoid a restraining order or similar legal steps.

This thread is what's a waste of space.
I'm sorry to hear that, Ilyushin, but if you don't like discussing aviation commercials, I'm sure there is another "The most beautiful f/a" thread around. Big grin

NoUFO



I support the right to arm bears
User currently offlineAcidradio From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 1867 posts, RR: 10
Reply 11, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2035 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Well it seems to me that the A300/310 is not made in passenger variant anymore (at least they don't want to sell any), so of course they are going to push the A340, even at the possible expense of the A300/310 passenger versions. They are not going to put a competitor's product up there as that starts to become libelous/slanderous.


Ich haben zwei Platzspielen und ein Microphone
User currently offlineDouglas DC-9 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 303 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2015 times:

Oh well, I don't see how it's THAT bad. I mean Airbus just wants to play dirty. If I was a CEO of an airline, or aircraft mfg. I would do something like that. Wouldn't you? Think about it... the message they're trying to send to promote their product is clear. But I still like "Fly Douglas Aircraft" some of the commercials McDonnell Douglas, as well as Douglas put out were not bad at all. I think the aircraft at gate 20 is a 767. I'm almost 100% sure it's a 767-XXX, not sure what model 767 it is.

Thanks Much,
Daniel


User currently offlineN754pr From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1999 times:

As Airbus are now the best selling airliners I guess they can sell them how they want to !!  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

User currently offlineDIA From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3273 posts, RR: 28
Reply 14, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1951 times:

Okay, okay . . .so what do we have here? An Airbus ad, not that bad, kind of humorous in a way, and probably not humerous depending on how much it offends any die-hard Boeing or Airbus fan. Although, I can't figure out why Airbus would use an A300-type a/c as the "dog" in their own commercial. Airbus is still producing the A300, albiet mostly cargo versions, but just made a bunch of pax versions in the last three years.

Even so, I still couldn't see Boeing making a commercial like this using one of their own a/c as the "what-not-to-fly-on" a/c.

Instead of getting into the obvoius nitty gritty here, I just wanted to point out a couple of my own notes of interest: First of all, the plane on the left looks like an A300 with ERJ-170 engines (they look smaller than normal). Secondly, not that it matters, has anybody else noticed the A300 Super Transporter in the background as they show the people boarding the A340. It's to the left, in front of the large buildings.

Does anybody know when is this advertisement aired and to whom does it target?


DIA



Ding! You are now free to keep supporting Frontier.
User currently offlineDanielbk From Israel, joined Feb 2003, 197 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1944 times:

Also,

it seems like the passangers are about to go thourgh a gate, and then
the next cut shows them boarding the plane through air-stairs..



cockpit? it's that little room in the front of the plane where the pilots seat.. but that's not important now
User currently offlineNoUFO From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 7916 posts, RR: 12
Reply 16, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1919 times:

Does anybody know when is this advertisement aired and to whom does it target?

AFAIK, it is the most recent ad but I could't find an exact date.
Airbus says, they would make TV ads "in order to communicate with the Customers of its Customers."

NoUFO



I support the right to arm bears
User currently offlineDIA From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3273 posts, RR: 28
Reply 17, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1879 times:

Thanks NoUFO for the quick response.

I wonder why Airbus is thinking. . ."Airbus says, they would make TV ads "in order to communicate with the Customers of its Customers."

My friends, coworkers, cousins? They all fly all the time, but they hardly care what they're flying on.

Airbuses "target market" would have to be preety small I'm guessing. Maybe it's the business fliers who fly all the time and have somewhat of an idea of what Boeing and Airbus makes. . .I guess. . .but that still isn't figuring to me.

DIA



Ding! You are now free to keep supporting Frontier.
User currently offlineCanadianNorth From Canada, joined Aug 2002, 3387 posts, RR: 9
Reply 18, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1829 times:

Well to me that commercial is just a waste.... its full of errors like the ones listed above, including the gate 20 a/c beeing another airbus from the looks of it, the pax goin throu a gate then up the airstairs, all that crap... Plus I had to play it over a few times trying to figure out what their point was...
As ussual Id take a Boeing over an Airbus anyday!

CanadianNorth



What could possibly go wrong?
User currently offlineRacko From Germany, joined Nov 2001, 4856 posts, RR: 20
Reply 19, posted (11 years 1 month 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1825 times:

They have to use an own aircraft, as if they would use a Boeing, Boeing could sue them. Remember, this is aimed at the average customer, not an aviation fan. The average customers get it this way: "Airbus good, other aircraft bad", they don't know anything about the type of the other plane. Airbus wants to place their brand in the minds of the pax.

User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4537 posts, RR: 42
Reply 20, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1662 times:

With regard to the issue of the bridge/stairs, if you look at the opening scene of the advertisement, you will see very clearly that the aircraft is not attached to any bridge at all, but sitting with stairs up against it. The area passengers are walking into is to is not an aerobridge at all, but the stairs down to tarmac level.

As for the advert itself, both manufacturers constantly say how everyone prefers their respective aircraft, and wouldn't want to travel on the competition, so I don't really see what the problem is.

V/F



"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
User currently offlineBoeing4ever From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 1618 times:

Funny response, Boeing4ever. "He's allowed to have an opinion, and this forum is for discussing aviation. That is a commercial for an aviation company, so your rebuke of this thread is the real waste of space."

So my opinion is invalid? Talk about double standards...


Careful throwing the term "double standards" around as you see NoUFO's opinions as invalid. If you don't like the thread, why waste your time bitching about it. Certain users on these forums like attack others for posts they see as "low quality". Your "opinion" was an attack.

B4e-Forever New Frontiers


User currently offlineHmmmm... From Canada, joined May 1999, 2104 posts, RR: 5
Reply 22, posted (11 years 1 month 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1576 times:

The reason why the "dog" aircraft is not a Boeing, is that Airbus doesn't want legal trouble. Be honest, these days, lawsuits start from almost nothing. And Boeing could use the money.

Kick Saddam's ass for good this time.



An optimist robs himself of the joy of being pleasantly surprised
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Now That Gas Prices Have Come Down... posted Mon Dec 15 2008 02:55:06 by PA101
Now That's A Long Trip For A 737! posted Tue Sep 30 2008 09:34:50 by Futurestar68
Now That AA's SJU Downsizing... posted Sun Sep 14 2008 07:57:06 by N701AA
Map That Displays US Commercial Air Traffic. posted Mon May 5 2008 20:40:11 by Apollo13
Now That's A Great Livery Change! posted Sat May 6 2006 18:23:09 by RootsAir
Now That Song Is Going....Is Ted Next? posted Wed Apr 19 2006 00:53:33 by Spartanmjf
What Will Happen With Kbtv Now That Indy Is Gone? posted Thu Jan 5 2006 19:27:33 by KLM672
That Repulsive Guy Next To You posted Mon Jan 2 2006 00:35:31 by WF2BNN
Now That's An Alliance: NW/KL posted Sat Aug 28 2004 00:41:12 by Premobrimo
Now That Concorde Is Gone Which Is Fastest Com. Ac posted Fri Apr 2 2004 01:27:34 by Tony Lu