Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Paris CDG Security Question  
User currently offlineBoeing 747-311 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 795 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 8 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 2966 times:

When i was in CDG, terminal 3, satelite 5 i belive, the security checkpoint was no more then 20 yards to the gates, and less then a hundred yards to the planes itself. IS this a regular thing in paris? are they all like this. i mean couldnt someone with some explosives in there back or something blown up the planes from that close? i mean is that really safe? because ill be honest didnt feel safe when i was in CDG that the security checkpoints were that close? is it like that in all the satelites?

thanks


Come fly with US
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineVarig md-11 From France, joined Jul 2000, 1605 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (11 years 8 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 2940 times:

hi

you were probably at CDG terminal 1
there are no satellites in terminal 3 or 2 for that matter

yes all the check-points are that close
it's due to the fact the airport was designed when bombing and highjacking wasn't so popular...after what you know, evertything had too be done in a hurry

if you feel so unsecure about it, how about many airlines which use a van transportable X-ray to scan some interline bags just under the plane??

these kind of "under" the plane x-ray are used for ,say, bags coming from the middle-east and interline on some US airlines...

feel more comfortable now?



AF TW AA NW DL UA CO BA U2 TP UX LH SK AZ MP KL SN VY HV LS SS TK SQ PC RG IW SE
User currently offlineBoeing 747-311 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 795 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 8 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 2926 times:

Yes, sorry about that, i was at terminal one. I got a little confused.

Why do they have these vans? Are you really serious about this? because that is really scary if you think about, becuase its right under the plane. Are they doing anything to move these security checkpoints back or anything like that?



Come fly with US
User currently offlineTreg From Estonia, joined Oct 2001, 538 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 8 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 2900 times:

What difference it makes??? As long as the potential hijacker is detected before the plane takes off, there is no difference.

If someone wants to blow himself up, then why should he go to the airport? Go to the subway during the rush-hour and the damage is much larger!


User currently offlineBoeing 747-311 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 795 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (11 years 8 months 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 2876 times:

well what difference does it make if the person sets off the bomb on the ground or in the air, theres still the same amount of people. acually there is probably more people, because off all the planes along with it. when someone sets off a powerful enough bomb that it can get that close to like 5 airliners, it can do a lot of damage.


Come fly with US
User currently offlineBoeing 747-311 From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 795 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 8 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2854 times:

Also, is it like this at other airports in europe? do you feel safe when the checkpoints are this close?


Come fly with US
User currently offlineDocpepz From Singapore, joined May 2001, 1971 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (11 years 8 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2850 times:

In airports like SIN and AMS, there is no one fixed security checkpoint after immigration. Each boarding gate has its own security, which makes it really really really close to the aircraft.

User currently offlineQantas744 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 246 posts, RR: 5
Reply 7, posted (11 years 8 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2812 times:

At SIN all passenger baggage is put through an X-ray machine prior to entering the check in area and is subsequently labelled to show it has been screened, although the terminal is full of transit pax whose bags have no such labels so it would appear to be fairly easy to get an unchecked bag into the terminals.

Matt



you can't buy time but you can sell your soul and the closest thing to heaven is to rock'n'roll
User currently offlineA330 From Belgium, joined May 1999, 649 posts, RR: 7
Reply 8, posted (11 years 8 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2793 times:

Boeing 747.311,

I feel a lot safer in Europe than in the US...
People are WAY too paranoid nowadays. Get a life for god's sake!! Where are we going too in aviation, no more metal knives but plastic ones which are actually far sharper than the steel ones, locked cockpits so that vital interaction with cabin crew is now completely lost, even our children are now refused a jumpseat, lunatic U.S. screeners who don't allow me to take my maglite into the cockpit while I have a VERY sharp and deadly axe behind my seat...



Shiek!
User currently offlineJumbolino From Germany, joined Mar 2001, 490 posts, RR: 18
Reply 9, posted (11 years 8 months 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2775 times:

Boeing 747-311,
you are paranoid, I like our european airports and I never feel unsafe but I will immediately stop flying if all this security bullshit will get along this way (meanwhile I feel unsafe when I see a security guy because I don't know what he will do with me or in which way he will threaten me this time and be my friend I prefer a short life in liberty and freedom than a long life in a way like living in a Dictatorship, yeah and I like my cigarettes, my beer in the evening ....). As mentioned before if you want to make terror it's not necessary to go to an airport, you can kill much more people if you go to the underground as mentioned before or to the market place at sunday time or to the next university, theatre ..... much more places I could mention here where you might have luck .......

Jumbolino.



Kind Regards, Jutta.
User currently offlineCschleic From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 1286 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (11 years 8 months 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 2747 times:

There are plenty of airports where checkpoints are close to the gates. Dallas/Ft. Worth, some Minneapolis gates, etc. etc. It's not that unusual.

User currently offlineJkent95 From Canada, joined Aug 1999, 42 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (11 years 8 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2735 times:

I flew out of that same satellite in January and I remember commenting to myself on how lax the security was. Firstly the security personnel at the x-ray machine were more interested in their conversation than checking their monitors. Secondly the doorway to the inner walkway that led to the jetway was not secured as it is in most airports. It was left partway open with a "chain" hanging from the latch. Imagine my surprise when a passenger just walked through the door to ask one of the gate personnel a question.

User currently offlineVarig md-11 From France, joined Jul 2000, 1605 posts, RR: 7
Reply 12, posted (11 years 8 months 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 2702 times:

ok that does it now!!

For 5 years I've been one of the security supervisor in this terminal ,and what I read here is too insulting

1st : the situation in this terminal is not at the top, and it's not at the top in most terminals throughout the world (cf latest case of journalist going thru SFO security with lead-lined suitcase)

wherever you go you'll find screeners chit-chatting and you have the feeling they're wanking around instead of working

2nd : as mentionned before this CDG1 is not the only terminal in the world using close-to-plane x-ray and frankly it remains to be proved it's more dangerous

we could do as in Turkey : only pax having a ticket enter the terminal and bags are screened and customs searched when entering the terminal...I'd go for it, and I wish I was there when "I-know-everything-I'm-an-expert" pax would create a scene too because old'ma needs smb to carry the 50kg suitcase

3rd : Jkent95 I perfectly know what you're talking about and you're right, these f*cking crap doors installed after 9/11 are trash

Nevertheless, contrarily to what people think, it is not the mess it looks like, considering that when you reach that point, you're supposed to be a "clean" pax who went thru security... plus when you pass these doors there are others electronically locked before you reach the planes

I sincerely hope this thread wasn't aiming at discrediting some EU airports in particular because that would be gross



AF TW AA NW DL UA CO BA U2 TP UX LH SK AZ MP KL SN VY HV LS SS TK SQ PC RG IW SE
User currently offlineJhooper From United States of America, joined Dec 2001, 6204 posts, RR: 12
Reply 13, posted (11 years 8 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2678 times:



For 5 years I've been one of the security supervisor in this terminal ,and what I read here is too insulting

wherever you go you'll find screeners chit-chatting and you have the feeling they're wanking around instead of working



Obviously, if the supervisor doesn't have a problem with it, then it has become an accepted practice! Hold your people accountable for doing their jobs, please.



Last year 1,944 New Yorkers saw something and said something.
User currently offlineVarig md-11 From France, joined Jul 2000, 1605 posts, RR: 7
Reply 14, posted (11 years 8 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2652 times:

No I don't have a problem with it

when you're on duty at a security check for 8 hours,with a rota of 20 minutes behind the screen and 20 minutes at metal detector, it's normal and human you chit-chat
it doesn't prevent you from doing your job that's what it has become an accepted practice, including in the US

and as far as your rude remark is concerned, what don't you spend some time at managing teams in an international airport and come back and tell us your experience?



AF TW AA NW DL UA CO BA U2 TP UX LH SK AZ MP KL SN VY HV LS SS TK SQ PC RG IW SE
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Paris CDG Airport Question posted Fri May 9 2003 18:04:56 by Sabena332
Question For Paris CDG Insiders posted Mon Apr 12 2004 11:55:49 by Mozart
Security Question posted Fri Dec 8 2006 04:41:19 by Tonytifao
Paris CDG Airport posted Sat Aug 19 2006 00:52:00 by Kaitak744
How Does This Work? Security Question posted Sat Aug 12 2006 21:04:04 by Tonytifao
Paris CDG Info On Transfers And Gate Info posted Mon Jul 24 2006 18:16:53 by 9W77W
Flying From Paris CDG/ORY To Bristol/Cardiff posted Tue Jul 11 2006 23:37:04 by Alespesl
European Security Question. posted Mon Mar 6 2006 17:48:04 by Letsgetwet
CDG T1 Question posted Mon Jan 30 2006 20:34:32 by BlueFlyer
Who Handle's BA At Paris CDG? posted Sun Dec 4 2005 15:25:14 by Concorde001