ERJ135 From Aruba, joined Nov 2000, 723 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2348 times:
I'm not 100% sure but I think American has some sort of clause over Eagle which prevent Eagle from using large quantities of aircraft over a certain size, 50 seats I think. This is why they went for a large order of ERJ 140's.They van have as many of those as they like and can use.
Still I guess they could have a 777 but I couldn't imagine it used anywhere on the network, it would have to be an hour or more flight and replace 9 ERJ's in a day. Doesn't offer a lot of flexibility.
Caribb From Canada, joined Nov 1999, 1649 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 2289 times:
I remember back in the 80s Nordair and Quebecair in Canada (both regional airlines) bought or leased 707s (QB) and DC-8-62s (QB/ND) to fly charter flights even though their scheduled market was relatively regional (Quebec/Ontario (QB) or Quebec/Nunavut/NWTT (ND) ).. so for a carrier flying 737s and smaller they suddenly had planes with intercontinental range. They found a niche charter market to the Caribbean and Europe they could serve outside of their traditional roles as regional carriers. It didn't last long. Both carriers eventually were bought up and merged into Canadian airlines.
Srbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 2188 times:
They definitely could if their markets made it viable. Piedmont bought 767-200s to fly CLT-LGW, and Piedmont was basically a regional airline (most flights were within the Southeastern U.S.). If a regional airline wanted to boost capacity on certain heavy routes to slot controlled airports (like DCA, LGA, JFK) they could add something like a 757 to add additional seats without changing the number of flights they offer to that city.
Doug_Or From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3573 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 2173 times:
Aby airline can buy any plane, if they have the green. The cannot paint it however they want. Trans States, for instance, couldn't just paint a 738 in American connection colors and start flying from STL to wherever. this would violate Americans scope clasue with their pilots and probably he contract between Trans States and american. it would be more likely with an independant regioanl like big sky used to be, or perhaps like Mesa.
Elwood64151 From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 2477 posts, RR: 5
Reply 7, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 2105 times:
Isn't TransStates owned by AA now that they bought TW?
Most regionals *are* owned by a major carrier. Eagle is owned by AMR Corp. Comair is owned by Delta. MESA is owned by USAirways.
Can a regional carrier buy/lease and operate a larger carrier? Sure! Why not? Would a regional carrier owned by a major carrier operate them? Not likely. Could a regional carrier own an aircraft that is operated by their parent company? Absolutely.
There's no reason why, for example, Great Plains couldn't buy some old MD-87s and operate those, if they thought it would be profitable and they had the cash.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it in summer school.
ATL2CDG From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 296 posts, RR: 10
Reply 8, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 2080 times:
You are incorrect.
Eagle is owned by AMR.
Comair and ASA are owned by DAL.
CoEx (Express Jet) is owned by CAL, although I believe it's been IPO'ed.
Piedmont, Allegheny and PSA are owned by US.
Pinnacle (ExpressOne) was IPO'ed by NWAC.
Horizon is owned by AS.
BigSky is owned by Mesaba.
Chicago Express is owned by ATA.
Mesa (HP, US, F9) is independent (note that Mesa has over a half dozen alter-ego airlines that it owns/operates as independent entities).
SkyWest (DL, UA) is independent.
ACA (DL, UA) is independent.
Chautauqua (DL, US) is independent.
Trans-states (AA) is independent.
Air Wisconsin (UA, F1) is independent.
Mesaba (NW) is independent.
Great Lakes (UA, F9) is indepenedent.
Colgan Air (US) is independent.
Gulfstream (CO) is indedendent.
As you can see from this short and incomplete list that independents outnumber wholly-owneds.
Back to the original question, most regional carriers cannot purchase "larger" aircraft because the pilots unions of the mainline affiliates often place caps on the equipment their "feeders" can operate - it's a form of job protection. Where management at mainline carriers able to feed out mainline growth to regional carriers at regional costs, they would - but the pilots unions have protected themselves with scope clauses, etc. Force majeure has seen the lifting of some fleet size restrictions, but I don't think management will ever be able to weasal 73s, 75s, or any other mainline equipment into their regional affiliates.
Propilotjw From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 590 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (13 years 1 month 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 1984 times:
Trans States also does work for USAirways express as well as AA connection. Chautauqua is an independant regional that does work for AA Connection, USAirways Express, Delta Connection, and America West Express.