Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
JetBlue Adds 15th Daily FLL-JFK  
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 33289 posts, RR: 71
Posted (11 years 9 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4683 times:

Not huge news, but I just think it is amazing that jetBlue is practically running a shuttle service between Ft. Lauderdale and JFK. They justed added a 15th frequency this Friday.

Leaving FLL-JFK @:
0610, 0745, 1040, 1055, 1150, 1230, 1300, 1355, 1635, 1735, 1755, 1900, 2000, 2100, 2230

Leaving JFK-FLL @:
0705, 0720, 0810, 0850, 0925, 1045, 1300, 1400, 1415, 1525, 1625, 1725, 1900, 2110, 2220

The new flights, BTW, are B6 349/350, leaving JFK @ 1625/Leaving FLL @ 2000.

In addition, jetBlue offers twice-daily FLL-IAD-LGB and daily FLL-LGB starting 8 May 2003.


a.
24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16370 posts, RR: 56
Reply 1, posted (11 years 9 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4645 times:

That's a remarkable amount of daily lift in one market!

It will be interesting to see what happens when Song & JetBlue go head-to-head.



Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineUN_B732 From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 4289 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (11 years 9 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4635 times:

I"m surprised, what does their loadfactor say about that?
But compare that to 5 767s and you've got an equivalent.
-Transaero Boeing 737-200



What now?
User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (11 years 9 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 4592 times:

5 767S???How many seats are there in Jetblue's 320s?Must be around 180ish?

User currently offlineSegmentKing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (11 years 9 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 4578 times:

159 I believe...

-n


User currently offlineLowfareair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (11 years 9 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 4506 times:

162. That would be about 2430 seats/day. That's about 10 763s, or 6 744s(in mixed config.)

User currently offlineScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 9 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 4484 times:

I do saw it with the flight schedules on the www.jetblue.com for myself from few week ago. It should be improve service out of FLL to JFK with fiftheen flight of the days. WoW!! I do knew that they are doing very well on jetBlue for very much. Well, talk ya later!

Regards!

Scott W.


User currently offlineAA717driver From United States of America, joined Feb 2002, 1566 posts, RR: 13
Reply 7, posted (11 years 9 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 4441 times:

Anyone know what the game plan is for JB? Will they try to fill in the middle of the country or continue the North/South and transcon stuff. They have the options to triple the size of their fleet...

I guess with UA downsizing and AA soon to follow, there will be holes to fill. Has anyone seen their big picture?TC



FL450, M.85
User currently offlineSegmentKing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (11 years 9 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4326 times:

If JetBlue keeps expanding at FLL they'll need more gates. Right now they have sole occupance of 1 gate and share another with America West.

-n


User currently offlineJBLUA320 From United States of America, joined May 2002, 3180 posts, RR: 19
Reply 9, posted (11 years 9 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4309 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I believe this is a temporary flight.

jetBlue uses gates C4 and C6 at FLL, and at peak times of the year, usually add flights onto the route. These flights almost always begin with the digit 3, and also have 3 digits, unlike the rest of the normal FLL flights.

A few years ago, I was on flight 384, and that flight was inoperative for about 10 months two weeks after my flight. It has made another come back, I see.

I wouldnt count on #15 being permanent. It is just another flight to handle capacity.

BTW- jetBlue seats 162.

JBLU


User currently offlineCoronado From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1213 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (11 years 9 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 4236 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

School and University Spring Break flights for the next couple weeks. Either that or really preamptive to Song!


The Original Coronado: First CV jet flights RG CV 990 July 1965; DL CV 880 July 1965; Spantax CV990 Feb 1973
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 33289 posts, RR: 71
Reply 11, posted (11 years 9 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 4227 times:

Miami/Ft. Lauderdale's spring break season is pretty much over. This week is the last significant week.


a.
User currently offlineHlywdCatft From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5321 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (11 years 9 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 4229 times:

We're getting closer to Jailbait spring break the next couple of weeks

What about Easter week? don't services pick up then?


User currently offlineFlyinryan99 From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 2031 posts, RR: 14
Reply 13, posted (11 years 9 months 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 4178 times:

"Jailbait spring break"

That's a new way to call it.... ::laughs:: =)

Ry


User currently offlineFsuwxman From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 439 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (11 years 9 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 4101 times:

"Jailbait" Spring Break is this week... I work with MDPS, they are off this week.


ASOS... Another Shi#y Observation Station
User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 15, posted (11 years 9 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 4082 times:

yes, I attend an MDPS school, Palmetto Senior High (I assume you are referring to the Miami Dade Public School system) and we, thankfully, have school off this week! I am going MIA-DFW-EGE-DFW-MIA this week-- skiing in Vail!


MIA777
User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8044 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (11 years 9 months 21 hours ago) and read 3925 times:

I believe that many flights between JFK and FLL should be a sign that B6 should seriously consider getting the A321-200.  Smile

User currently offlineJeff G From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 442 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (11 years 9 months 17 hours ago) and read 3870 times:

I believe that many flights between JFK and FLL should be a sign that B6 should seriously consider getting the A321-200.

No way. 18 or 24 extra seats on a limited selection of routes would not be worth the expense, complexity and bother of another type in the fleet. Better to stick with a single type that does anything and goes anywhere the airline flies. The A321 is severely limited on transcons, has a number of different parts, and would create overbooking problems in the case of a substitution with an A320. Who needs it.


User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8044 posts, RR: 5
Reply 18, posted (11 years 9 months 14 hours ago) and read 3826 times:

Jeff G,

I have some comments in regards to why I think B6 should get the A321-200:

1. The plane has enough commonality with the A320 that there is no need to expensively retrain flight, cabin and ground service crews.

2. The range issue has been pretty much solved with the new higher-MTOW versions that US put on their transcon flights between the US West Coast and PHL, PIT and CLT.

3. Given the very busy JFK-FLL and JFK-LGB routes, the A321 will be perfect to provide extra capacity without having to use up additional takeoff/landing slots at various airports.

I'm not asking B6 to buy a large fleet of A321's; at most, B6 could use about 11-14 A321's on their busier long-distance routes.


User currently offlineJeff G From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 442 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (11 years 9 months 13 hours ago) and read 3794 times:

Ray,

I appreciate your enthusiasm, but I still don't think it's a good idea.

1. The plane has enough commonality with the A320 that there is no need to expensively retrain flight, cabin and ground service crews.

I admit training is not a significant factor for the operating crew. Maintenance would be another factor. There are significant physical differences between the two types, though they're not much apparent to the pilots.

2. The range issue has been pretty much solved with the new higher-MTOW versions that US put on their transcon flights between the US West Coast and PHL, PIT and CLT.

Range isn't the problem, performance is. The airplane can physically make it, but if it's at all full, it is restricted to much lower altitudes. This has ramifications for fuel burn and passenger comfort. And the A321 has the same wing as the A320, but is forced to carry 35000 more lbs, which affects climb performance. A fully loaded A321 could not depart from LGB, SAN, and possibly other west coast stations with enough fuel to make the east coast. What's the point of most seats if you have to block them off?

3. Given the very busy JFK-FLL and JFK-LGB routes, the A321 will be perfect to provide extra capacity without having to use up additional takeoff/landing slots at various airports.

The extra seats might be useful going to FLL or other Florida stations (none of which are slot restricted), but the only way to make it work reliably would be to make a station all A321 all the time, complete with spares. JetBlue does not want to be faced with bumping 24 pax or so from a full flight because a widget broke and the only spare aircraft is an A320. How will you accommodate them, on the next (full) filght?

It's not just a simple matter of "oh, the pilots can fly either one, so they're interchangeable". They are two different aircraft, with different strengths. I'm not ruling out the A321 from ever appearing in JetBlue colors, but it's not a no-brainer decision just because airplanes are filling up.


User currently offlineScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (11 years 9 months 11 hours ago) and read 3774 times:

This is best idea B6 really need orders on the new Airbus A321-200 aircraft and kept it up for more customers on the every of the flight. This is useful for the aircraft made with daily nonstop to JFK flight. Please let's do it for jetBlue on the orders Airbus A321-200. Thanks!

Regards!


User currently offline777d From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 300 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (11 years 9 months 11 hours ago) and read 3748 times:

Jeff G,

Great points, I had no idea regarding the 321 vs 320. Interesting points, so if the 321 had a different wing and etc it would be able to have a better climb and performance? If it did have a different wing and etc, then it would lose most of it's commonality with the 320 and become a different plane all together?


777d





User currently offlineScottb From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6826 posts, RR: 32
Reply 22, posted (11 years 9 months 11 hours ago) and read 3757 times:

Yes, it does seem like jetBlue's FLL-JFK route does scale back quite a bit once summer rolls around; down to 11 daily round-trips at the beginning of June. Still a lot of seats each way, but a 27% cut from peak capacity.

I do agree with Jeff G about the unsuitability of the A321 to jetBlue's business. One of the most important things for keeping costs down, by far, is keeping their operations as simple as possible. Only one fleet type, with only one capacity, keeps scheduling and maintenance simple. What does happen when a full A321 has a mechanical and the only available spare is an A320? To compare, Southwest has only ordered and taken delivery of a single model of the NG737, the -700. And, moreover, they've configured them with the same number of seats as the 737-300's to keep scheduling simpler (consider that they could have squeezed in another row on the -700 and still had seat pitch comparable to the other majors). And offering more flights is just more convenience for your passengers; it's really only a problem when you're very short on slots (they're not) or need to offer more than, say, 30 daily round-trips. WN offers 22 daily round-trips between LAX and OAK and 29 between DAL and HOU, as an example.


User currently offlineFlairport From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (11 years 9 months 9 hours ago) and read 3708 times:

Is concourse B open yet?
jetBlue could get 3 gates there and lose the others. looks like FLL is going to be a minihub


User currently offlineScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3634 times:

Flairport,

Yes, it is for the new concourse B is already opening from January 7, 2003. No, jetBlue not doesn't go inside with the gate at concourse B either and only for useful at the concourse C with Continental Airlines. I do know America West has planned to moved into the new concourse B and jetBlue really need more space at the gate for used LGB flight. They really need additional more new third gates. Well, hope this is your help for the FLL airport. Thanks!

Regards!

Scott W.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
JetBlue Adding A 9th Daily FLL-JFK! posted Wed Oct 24 2001 04:57:58 by MAH4546
JetBlue To Offer 16 Daily FLL-JFK Flights posted Thu Jul 11 2002 17:16:25 by MAh4546
JetBlue Adds Third Daily JFK-OAK Flight 3/10 posted Fri Jan 18 2002 16:57:00 by Lindy field
JetBlue To Make 10th Daily FLL-JFK Permanent posted Mon Nov 5 2001 08:02:01 by MAH4546
JetBlue: 10th Daily FLL-JFK! posted Fri Nov 2 2001 22:39:34 by MAH4546
JetBlue Adds 7 New Gates At JFK posted Thu Jun 1 2006 16:40:15 by Planemannyc
JetBlue Adds Service To FLL posted Wed Jul 11 2001 01:17:23 by MAH4546
JetBlue Adds 2nd JFK-AUA posted Mon Oct 2 2006 00:24:41 by FA4B6
EK Adds Another Daily Flight From JFK posted Sat Jun 3 2006 15:42:54 by JFK998
JetBlue To Start JFK-PDX, Add 2nd Daily SEA-JFK posted Wed Feb 23 2005 16:05:38 by TOLtommy