Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Whats Wrong With The New 777-200LR And 777-300ER  
User currently offlineUnited777 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1657 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 7981 times:

I really hope this topic does not start a bad debate and make people hate each other but after reading that news Thai Airways will order the A340-500/ -600 I was thinking about this.

What does the A340-500 /-600 have the Boeing 777-200LR /-300ER doesn't! The 772LR is aimed at the A345 and the 773ER at the A346. It seems like more airline are picking the 340 series! Iberia Airlines picked the 340 over the 777-300ER. The new 340 aircrafts have many more customer than the new 777s. Yea the 772LR comes out a few years after the A345 but it has more range. The 777 has always been picked over the A340 by airlines and passengers! Do the new 340s have new interiors to compete with the award winning 777 interior.

Also the airlines that have ordered the 340-500 and A340-600 have ordered more aircraft than the airline that have ordered the 777-200LR and 777-300ER.

Do you think Boeing should be worried that all potential 777LR and 773ER customers are already order the 340-500 and A340-600?

I'll have to say in my personal opinion the A340-600 has a very bright future more than the 777-300ER. I know some might not agree with me of course.

35 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineArtsyman From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4745 posts, RR: 34
Reply 1, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 7951 times:

I would say that the economy and the fact that American companies are feeling a pretty heavy backlash due to Americas pretty poor image in the rest of the world.

User currently offlineMarcus From Mexico, joined Apr 2001, 1808 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 7924 times:

Really?..............I would expect one thing to be boycotting Mc Donald's or French wine because of personal views......but an airline company getting in that silly game?


Kids!....we are going to the happiest place on earth...TIJUANA! signed: Krusty the Clown
User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 3, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 7894 times:

That's America's childish views about just France.

The whole world has a problem with us right now, and rightfully so.

That aside, I know few passengers that are not aviation fanatics that prefer 3-3-3 or 2-5-2 to the 2-4-2 on the A340.

N


User currently offlineArtsyman From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4745 posts, RR: 34
Reply 4, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 7876 times:

I agree, right or wrong, the worlds opinion of America has never been lower. This is not to suggest that this is the only reason, just one of the reasons.

User currently offlineUnited777 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1657 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 7862 times:

Alright fella's back to my topic! Damm it I know this would happen.  Smile

User currently offlineN79969 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 7829 times:

I don't think anything is wrong with the 777NG. First, neither plane is in service. That inhibits some carriers from ordering the types. Second these aircraft have already garnered a respectable number of order considering to the best of my recollection:

Firm 773ER orders:

JAL
ANA
AF
BR
PK
GECAS

Prospective:
CX
Emirates
ILFC?

The last Yahoo! press release I saw quoted an executive from Thai saying that the Airbus 340s would be $100 million each. After reading, I assumed they had to be getting 343s judging by the price. Again to the best of my recollection, the standard 777-300 (not ER) is the most expensive product Boeing sells at over $200 million catalog. I think we can safely assume that the 773ER will cost more.

Airbus gave Thai an incredible deal apparently. That is no shortcoming of the 777.


User currently offlineArtsyman From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4745 posts, RR: 34
Reply 7, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 7751 times:

I still think it has a lot to do with the economy. Of the top 6 airlines in the US, Delta, Continental, United, American all use the 777, and US and NW don't. If the economy for the US carriers was better, then you would probably see some of these aircraft going to them, but that isnt going to happen any time in the near term

User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16907 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 7712 times:

Oh please, Countries like Thailand are gobbling up US Military equipment exports.

And Spain is one of the Nations Supporting the coalition to disarm Saddam's regime.

They "could" boycott Boeing's Commercial aviation division, but no way they would not buy American made military equipment.

US Military technology is far superior to anything EADS or Russia produces, and that advantage is one reason why Boeing can ride this economic downturn and Airbus (EADS) will have to go back to the well (subsidies).



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineB-HOP From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2000, 657 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 7705 times:

Poor US image
ETOPS (mightbe?)
Exclusive GE engines



Live life to max!!!
User currently offlineHamlet69 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2754 posts, RR: 58
Reply 10, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 7676 times:

United777,

Actually, I hold the exact opposite viewpoint you do.

If we look at the sales of the A340NG vs. the 777LR, we notice that the A340-500 is beating the 777-200LR by a significant margin, while the A340-600/777-300ER battle is virtually a dead heat. However, one must first take into consideration that the A340NG has been offered for nearly 3 years longer than the 777LR. This immediately should add credence to the Boeing twin.

Next, let us also look at the specific orders. When we do, we find that, so far, both aircraft have captured 'expected' orders (i.e., orders from previous A340/777 operators, respectively):

A340NG
Aerolineas Argentinas (4 A342) orders 6 A346.
Air Canada (8 A343) orders 2 A345 and 3 A346.
Iberia (18 A343) orders 8 A346.
Lufthansa (7 A342 and 28 A343) orders 10 A346.
Virgin Atlantic (7 A343) orders 10 A346.
China Eastern (5 A343) orders 5 A346.
Qatar Amiri (1 A342) orders 1 A345.

777LR
All Nippon (15 772, 4 772ER, 15 773) orders 6 773ER.
Japan Airlines (7 772, 11 772ER, 8 773) orders 8 773ER.

At first glance, this tells us that current operators are sticking with a particular airframe. However, it should be noted that Virign Atlantic, Qatar Amiri (and I've heard rumors of China Eastern) are using their newly ordered aircraft, not as expansion, but to replace their current fleet. This should immediately tell us that there is something wrong with the A340-300, as a 10 year old aircraft should not need replacement (a la MD-11).


Now, we must look at those orders that we could consider 'decisive.' In other words, customers who have either both A340 & 777, or neither aircraft in their current fleet.

both
Singapore (17 A343, 772ER, 8 773) orders 5 A345.
Air France (14 + 4 A343, 18 772ER) orders 10 773ER.
EgyptAir (3 A342, 5 772ER) orders 2 A346.

neither
Pakistan Int'l orders 3 772ER, 2 772LR, 3 773ER.
EVA Air orders 3 772LR and 4 773ER (+ 8 UFO 773ER).
South African orders 6 A343 and 6 A346.

Here we again see a virtual dead heat. Three customers have gone A340, while three have gone 777. One last note is that Singapore ordered the A345 before the decision to replace the A343 fleet, and before the specifications for the 777-200LR was finalized. At the time, the -200X was very much an under-performing airframe. Not so with the -200LR. There has been constant talk of SQ going ahead with a -200LR order to replace the -500. It can only be speculated if this will actually occur or not.

Finally, we have Emirates, who is a 777 operator (an A330) and has ordered the A340-500, and is expected to sign a 777-300ER order at Paris. This airline is difficult to gauge, as they seem willing to buy just about anything that comes out. However, they are also one of the more performance-oriented airlines, which can be very telling.

Overall, I don't see the A340NG capturing too many more significant orders. I will discuss both Thai and Cathay at a later date, as they are both interesting cases. However, after we have looked at the current customer list, it should be apparent that those current A340 customers who are in a position to order the A340NG have done so, while most major 777 operators have yet to ante-up to the 777LR, mostly due to the later development schedule and current economic climate. When the time comes, 777LR orders should soar.

Regards,

Hamlet69

P.S. - Much more to say, but this is getting rather long.



Honor the warriors, not the war.
User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 21
Reply 11, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 7644 times:

Poor US image will not affect aircraft sales too much IMO.The poor world economy is the biggest hinderance to 777NG sales followed by the GE exclusivity deal IMO.

User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16907 posts, RR: 51
Reply 12, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 7626 times:

Air France is a 777-300ER customer, they might even be the launch customer.


Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineDonder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6660 posts, RR: 21
Reply 13, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 7597 times:

They are the launch customer AFAIK.Aren't they going to use it to replace the 744/2/3s or as a complement?

User currently offlineHamlet69 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2754 posts, RR: 58
Reply 14, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 7586 times:

Neither a poor U.S. world image nor GE exclusitivity are large factors in 777LR sales. The former, as this rarely affects multi-billion dollar contracts to begin with, unless it is from politically controlled entities. The latter, as GE has proven that performance and maintanence issues far outweigh training. This has been witnessed with JAL and ANA, as well as comments from CX stating they didn't consider engine commonality a factor (CX is strongly rumored to be close to a deal for the 777-300ER) while SQ has flat out stated that this is a non-issue. Also remember that the A340NG have virtual engine exclusitivity as well - for an engine family not available on the A340-200/-300.

Purchase price, OTOH, is a large factor.

Regards,

Hamlet69



Honor the warriors, not the war.
User currently offlineSllevin From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 3376 posts, RR: 6
Reply 15, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 7556 times:

The Iberia deal is in itself instructive. Airbus had to give significant concessions to get the deal, far beyond the price of the aircraft itself. Specifically, Airbus has guaranteed a resale value to Iberia should Iberia opt to sell the fleet.

Why is that significant? Because the A340, while more expensive to operate, costs less than the 777. For Iberia, that means that if things are slow, and they fly the planes less, they spend less money. In short, the 340 'eats less' when sitting unused on the ramp.

When times are good, and you are flying more, then the hourly costs will become more significant.

Iberia has the best of both worlds. In the short term, they hedge by buying Airbus. If flying picks up, they have the option of getting out of the 340's without significant financial consequences.

The future will be interesting, indeed.

Steve


User currently offlineLuisca From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 7452 times:

Also remember that The rumored UPS Deal could sway the balance to the 777-200LR instead of the A345.

User currently offlineIkarus From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 3524 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 7398 times:

Hamlet69: I thought Virgin is using the A346 to replace 747 classics, not A343s?

What's going to happen to the VS A343s, then?


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 7300 times:

perhaps some of you are also forgetting that the A340NGs had about a 2.5yr headstart on the 777LRs!

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 7266 times:

Also remember that The rumored UPS Deal could sway the balance to the 777-200LR instead of the A345.

And EK & LH Cargo to that as well... both of whom expressed interest in a 90Ton 772LRF  Big grin


User currently offlineCrj 900 From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 595 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 7250 times:

i'm wondering if Thai just wants 4 engined long haul a/c? Personally i'd buy the Boeing product, but I'm not the one buying.

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 7232 times:

could be... it's worth noting that TG did withdraw operating its 773As under ETOPS120, which is pretty pathetic IYAM.


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 22, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 7164 times:

Virgin is indeed replacing 742s with the 346 - not replacing 343s.

Qatar's Amiri flight likes their 342 fine... but as we know, the 342 isn't the best shrink in the world.

N


User currently offlineCloudy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 7109 times:

This should immediately tell us that there is something wrong with the A340-300, as a 10 year old aircraft should not need replacement (a la MD-11).
----

The thing that went wrong with the A-340 was that the "Superfan" program died. Airbus was counting on a vastly superior engine to sell this bird. When that failed to materialize, the A340 was a sitting duck for the 777.

Airbus hopes the -500 and -600 fulfill the original promise of the A340. As to the 777LR - from what I've heard- the economic advantages of a twin over a quad start to fade over the kind of distances these planes operate. Yet the 777 will probably have more cargo volume, so we will have to see....

Anyway, Boeing is now taking the same risk with the 7E7 as Airbus took with the A340. Because it has a more or less conventional configuration - most of the 7E7's savings will have to come from newer materials and better engines. If Boeing's suppliers and the major enginemakers can't make it happen - Boeing could end up giving much less then they are promising now. Its a risky game......


User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (11 years 8 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 7076 times:

from what I've heard- the economic advantages of a twin over a quad start to fade over the kind of distances these planes operate

methinks someone's been reading a little too much airbus.com propaganda.... especially considering that this claim isnt supported by other sources of evidence (not to mention Boeing  Nuts)



Yet the 777 will probably have more cargo volume

actually, the A340NGs are to have more available cargo volume... though the 777NGs are to carry greater payload.


25 Dynkrisolo : VS original plan was to replace the older 742s with the 346s. After 9/11, VS wanted to cancel the 346 order. Airbus renegotiated with VS. At the end,
26 BWIA 772 : If memory serves me correctly the orginal 340s were launched and in service before the 777. The 777 came and was like a good ole can wup a$$ for the
27 GKirk : Maybe the airlines actually done months of research into both aircraft and found that the A340 was better for their individual needs. Whereas some peo
28 Hamlet69 : Sllevin, It went unnoticed at the time, but Iberia let slip a little detail about their A340-300 order that Leahy didn't want disclosed. According to
29 Post contains images Hkg82 : The General Electric GE90-115B engines that will power these aircraft are absolutely fucking massive!!!! I don't know how the wings can hold that on t
30 Post contains images ConcordeBoy : Can you imagine FOUR of those F^ck that... the 777 is a TWINJET par excellence.... the reason it's so great! I seem to recall reading somewhere that P
31 United777 : Thanks for the comments fella's! I think these are great products both Airbus and Boeing have made, just they are coming into service during bad times
32 ConcordeBoy : the case could be made that the 777NGs are Boeing's answer to the A380... medium-capacity/ultralongrange/point-to-point versus superhigh-capcity/longr
33 Hamlet69 : Airbus has just released their March '03 updates, and there is an interesting detail that (obviously) went unreported earlier. As part of the deal for
34 ConcordeBoy : Hammy, what wonderful news. I do believe that it was reported, the the language left many of us confused as to whether or not the order was cancelled
35 Hamlet69 : "MS operates PW-powered 772ERs, correct?" Correct. Which means that no matter which route they take (A346 or 773ER), they will be introducing a new en
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Whats Wrong With The MD-11? posted Tue Mar 9 2004 20:40:10 by Avi8tir
AZ 777, What's Wrong With The Color? posted Wed Sep 24 2003 20:52:12 by A388
Air Wisconsin And It's Role With The New US posted Wed Sep 28 2005 20:43:48 by ATWZW170
Wassup Now With The AI 777? posted Tue Dec 14 2004 17:25:30 by MrNiji
Whats The Deal With The New Terminal @ ISP? posted Sat Jun 26 2004 03:56:04 by IslipWN
Largest U.S. Airport With The Fewest 777's posted Fri Aug 22 2003 20:46:52 by Luv2fly
When Did The 767's Get The New 777-style Interior? posted Wed Aug 21 2002 00:03:18 by QatarAirways
What's Wrong With The A380 Delays? posted Wed Oct 18 2006 10:19:03 by MBJ2000
What's Going On With The 2 New AS 738s? posted Fri Sep 1 2006 07:03:45 by RobK
What Is So Wrong With The MD-11? posted Tue May 23 2006 21:25:05 by Bh4007