Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Cathay Cuts In Total 37% Of Capacity -  
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13742 posts, RR: 19
Posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2193 times:

Cathay Pacific has announced that it is cutting 37% of capacity, the equivalent of 184 weekly flights.

"The cities to which services have been reduced are: Amsterdam, Bangkok, Denpasar, Frankfurt, Jakarta, Kuala Lumpur, London, Los Angeles, Manila, Melbourne, Nagoya, Osaka, Paris, Seoul, Singapore, Sydney, Taipei, Tokyo and Vancouver."

"Cathay Pacific is being badly affected by the fall in passenger demand and we must therefore take action to conserve cash and minimise spending. With lingering uncertainty in the Middle East and the profound impact that fear of atypical pneumonia has had globally, we do not know how long the current weakness in travel demand will continue. It is therefore not possible, at this stage, to quantify the potential impact on the company," said CEO David Turnbull.

A full list of cancellations is available at the Cathay Pacific Press Room


Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineVr-hkg From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 182 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2179 times:

...and Singapore is cutting flights too. Big whoop.

It is sickening to see a member of the aviation community rejoicing in the misfortunes of any airline. I don't see the CX crowd gleefully posting about every one of SQ's problems.


User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13742 posts, RR: 19
Reply 2, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 2172 times:

Wow(!). I bet no one saw a post like yours coming up.

Rejoicing? I'd like you to find a quote of rejoice in the starter post.

"I don't see the CX crowd gleefully posting about every one of SQ's problems."

Look harder.



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineVr-hkg From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 182 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2169 times:

I've seen enough of your past posts to be well aware why you posted this in a new thread when there was already another thread (gee - started by you!) with the exact same news.

User currently offlineAirbus Lover From Malaysia, joined Apr 2000, 3248 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2150 times:

Well it is true that S_air posts many of such news, but I believe in the other thread it was a separate press release.

User currently offlineBuckfifty From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 1316 posts, RR: 19
Reply 5, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2141 times:

Although it's going a bit too far to call Singapore_Air names, this constant posting of news by percentile is really counterproductive.

I mean, I just read a posting claiming 33% cancelled. Another one at 37%? A little bit of useless and overdone information. There really is no point to this that I can see.

The same goes for all the posts of flight cancellations. This is taking on the proportions of the war vs. no war threads over in the non-av forum.

I think a good policy is to consolidate threads in this forum. Reduce a bit of the clutter...


User currently offlineVr-hkg From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 182 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2129 times:

My point exactly, and Singapore_Air started both of those threads. He apparently feels the extra 4% merits a new thread and some more gloating.

User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13742 posts, RR: 19
Reply 7, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2118 times:

Such posts are not useless and are not made for gloating.

I suggest we get back to the topic at hand and stop this bickering and senseless 'conflict of words'.



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineCx flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6605 posts, RR: 55
Reply 8, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2115 times:

Not made for gloating?! Who are you kidding SQ_boy?

"I suggest we get back to the topic at hand and stop this bickering and senseless 'conflict of words'." - you mean why doesn't everyone shut up and just let you post all the negative topics you can find about CX? I can almost see the big grin on your face.


User currently offlineBuckfifty From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 1316 posts, RR: 19
Reply 9, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2111 times:

If it's not useless, what do you expect people to say in this thread that is any different than the 33% thread?

"I knew it! I told you it was going to be 37%. Oh poor Cathay..."

Perhaps you may reduce the amount of people flaming you by posting all of your news in one thread instead. That way, no one can accuse you of gloating.


User currently offlineB-HXB From New Zealand, joined Jan 2001, 745 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2114 times:

To be fair to Singapore_air, his earlier thread was posted well earlier than the press release by CX which only came out today. Although I do agree with Buckfifty re: consolidation.

Logistics aside, this is very sad news - some of these destinations are being severely cut in capacity, such as Vancouver which is going from a twice daily to a daily, and Paris who is seeing a +50% reduction in capacity (from daily flights to thrice weekly).

It seems like that the only long-haul destinations not yet affected by flight cuts are Auckland, Rome, San Francisco, Toronto and New York. How long will that last, I wonder?


User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13742 posts, RR: 19
Reply 11, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2093 times:

"Perhaps you may reduce the amount of people flaming you by posting all of your news in one thread instead. That way, no one can accuse you of gloating."

True Buckfifity, that consolidation should have been adopted in this case. However, I shouldn't have to stop posting anything to stop people accusing me of gloating.

It's most unfortunate how certain people misconstrue the actual purpose of a news thread and turn it into a slanging match in the hopes that the whole thread is deleted.

Such forms of impertinent childishness can be so very easily avioded.



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineCx flyboy From Hong Kong, joined Dec 1999, 6605 posts, RR: 55
Reply 12, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2088 times:

SQ_boy, I think you are quite hilarious.

User currently offlineVr-hkg From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 182 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2088 times:

Ditto, thoroughly hilarious.

User currently offlineB-HOP From Hong Kong, joined Nov 2000, 637 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 2020 times:

Yes, really hilarious matey


Live life to max!!!
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13742 posts, RR: 19
Reply 15, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 2006 times:

3 irrelevant posts and what do those three users (replies 12 to 14 inclusive) have in common....? Exactly. Says something doesn't it  Insane


Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineDynkrisolo From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1866 posts, RR: 7
Reply 16, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 2003 times:

I think you guys are being way over sensitive. He was transcribing or summarizing what was reported in the press. The titles he used were nearly identical to what I read in the Wall Street Journal. Then, you guys probably should write to the editors of many newspapers and ask them to stop gloating! If he only posted CX's cuts and made no mention of SQ's cuts, then you guys might have a point. But this is simply not the case here. I guess you guys probably have gotten the SAPS (Singapore_Air Paranoia Syndrome).  Acting devilish

User currently offline9V-SPK From Hong Kong, joined Aug 2001, 1646 posts, RR: 6
Reply 17, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1997 times:

How come I'm a Hong Kee and I have no hard feelings on S_Air? Because I'm more biased on SQ. But that does not mean I hate CX, in fact I reckon CX is a great airline too and I've flown them, and I have friends that like CX and SQ too.

But on this net the Hong Kees hate SQ (S_Air) a lot but for the Singaporeans they don't really care. What a shame.

Best Regards


User currently offlineJames From Taiwan, joined Dec 2002, 53 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1958 times:

Can't everyone agree that the SARS issue is a problem for all carriers? Why this senseless back and fourth bickering over SQ and CX. Makes no sense to me.

User currently offlineHkg82 From Hong Kong, joined Apr 2002, 1297 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1918 times:

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, many a.net members here are way too sensitive. The topic is about CX making further cuts to its network, but it has degenerated into the typical pointless discussions about Singapore_Air, posting of CX & SQ news, and all that gibberish.

Is it so difficult for those of you (you know who you are) to just stay on the topic? It’s getting ridiculous to be honest.

Right, now that’s out of the way, does anyone know how CX’s fifth freedom routes are performing?

Hkg82.


User currently offlineCXCPA From Hong Kong, joined May 2000, 387 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (11 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1889 times:

It is really a sad news.  Sad

Now no one want to travel to Hong Kong and not welcome Hong Kong people because of the stupid mainland government. So CX lose of much business and it annouced profit warning. They never did it before! Hope the SARS problem can be solved soon


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Bad Is The Shortage Of Capacity In Europe posted Sun Apr 3 2005 21:15:20 by MACDADDY
STL New Flight Total After AA Cuts In Nov? posted Tue Sep 16 2003 21:24:16 by Atcboy73
Singapore Airlines Cuts 19.7% Of Capacity posted Fri Apr 11 2003 12:38:28 by Singapore_Air
Iberia Cuts 20% The Salaries Of Its Pilots posted Tue Apr 17 2012 09:37:22 by spantax
Manx2 Crash Landing In The Isle Of Man posted Sat Mar 10 2012 12:01:31 by Cabincrewifly
WN & FL Cuts In Florida? posted Sat Jan 28 2012 21:05:42 by olddominion727
Total No. Of DL Economy Comfort Seats On Regionals? posted Wed Dec 14 2011 21:08:03 by crj200faguy
BA B733 In DAR, 1st Of December posted Fri Dec 3 2010 11:17:39 by migair54
AZ Cuts In Half The Losses (1st Half '10 Vs '09) posted Mon Aug 2 2010 05:02:12 by 777
Spotting In Colombia -short Of A Crime posted Mon May 31 2010 12:28:26 by ACES320