Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Would DL Consider Hubbing At DEN?  
User currently offlineNickofatlanta From Australia, joined May 2000, 1493 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 2768 times:

Have read all the posts about CO closing down CLE and moving back into DEN. Am curious as to whether DL would consider beating them to it and moving from SLC to DEN. DL has made noises about not being happy with their SLC hub over high taxes and the like. Any thoughts ...

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineScottysAir From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2723 times:

Are you trying to tell me exactly about DL wanting move to DEN and I don't think so either for SLC Hub. It's should be remain as same Hub very much long time. I don't want make to be move out from SLC to DEN either. It's should be alright for DL. Well, talk ya later!


Scott W.

User currently offlineHlywdCatft From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5321 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2707 times:

yeah and DFW isnt exactly that far either,

but then again look at USAirways.

I think if Delta wanted anything else in the west it would want LAX, SEA or SFO for a Pacific gateway.

User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2660 times:

I doubt it. I think though that as the industry slowly restructures, some of DL hubs are likely to be pared down or de-emphasized entirely. DFW comes to my mind as the obvious one. It is much smaller than AA at DFW and it would make sense to redeploy capacity at other mainline DL hubs like CVG and ATL. I also think the long-term survival of the SLC hub is in question. I read in the paper a while ago that DL's SLC hub is extremely costly to operate, but who knows.

I don't think DL is going to hub at DEN.


User currently offlineUal777contrail From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2647 times:

Why would DL hub in DEN? They say the landing fees are outrageous here. If they don't like SLC I bet they wouldntt like DEN. Plus they would have to get rid of UAL and that wont happen.

ual 777 contrail

User currently offlineKramri From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 74 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 2516 times:

All of this talk is based on UA shutting down in DEN. United has the lion's share of the airport at around 60 gates, and I think there are only 2 vacant gates at the airport right now (concourse C). So there is no assurances that anyone is making a move to Denver.
Additionally, if DL is not happy with the taxes in SLC, then they should stay as far away from DEN as they can!
I think it would be much more feasible for CO to make the move to DEN and recreate a western hub. With airlines in the economic position they are, DL moving to DEN would make no sense.

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2501 times:

Despite the high costs... DEN has O&D that SLC could never dream of. That could be something DL might be interested in once UAL dies; but hard to say if that could justify relocating their 3rd largest hub. Perhaps they'd rather just move the SLC hub equipment into SFO/LAX once UA kicks the bucket?

User currently offlineNonrevman From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 1326 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 2441 times:

I think that DL will maintain SLC as the hub in the West. DEN is more expensive and besides, DL is not that fond of sharing hubs. If a hub has to be cut, I agree that DFW will be the first. It all depends on what happens in the coming months.

User currently offlineThomacf From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 550 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2391 times:

I think DL would not close SLC for DEN however the possibility of SFO or LAX I could see in the event of a UA liquidation. If that happened I can't believe no one any any forums I have seen has mentioned DL moving from CVG to ORD if UA goes under. It seems DL has decreased mainline service over the past few years in CVG and would love all the O&D that Chicago has to offer. With AA struggling they would seem like the best fit to absorb all the UA gates at ORD and go head to head with AA. Hubs in ATL, SFO or LAX and ORD would be incredible for them!!!

User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 8141 posts, RR: 26
Reply 9, posted (13 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 2382 times:

You know, there is so much talk on here about airlines switching, dropping, swapping, buying, selling, eating, bartering, liquidating, and digesting various hubs. I'll tell you what, most of it is just water under the bridge. Some of these comments have no validity whatsoever.

Stop and think for a minute how difficult it would be to relocated a hub. This is not an easy process at all. There are so many aspects that need to be changed that it cannot be done overnight. You cannot just simply pick up and move hub operations at once. You cannot get out of airport leases that easily. Then new leases at the new airport have to be negotiated. Then there is the whole employee issue. Are you going relocate all the hub employees too? let alone how many would actually like to transfer. Then you have to move aircraft and ground equipment. It would be no easy to task to relocate a couple thousand pieces of ground equipment. Then now you've completely abandoned your customer base in one city, stranding numerous very elite customers. Now you walk into a new city where you have to build up a new customer base. Then you have to deal with your customers at the spoke cities too. Don't forget having suitable maintenance facilities for overnight checks too. What about your regional partners too? Or getting governmental approval to operate international flights. What about the political struggle, bribes, and deals that will be offered to keep the hub in one city versus another.

This is not an easy task to accomplish. I don't know of anytime in the past that such a move has been accomplished. Let alone, the financial state of the industry, such a move would be a grave mistake on any airline's part. You would start to turn a profit from the start. In order to accomplish such a feat, you would have to gradually draw down flights from the one hub and gradually build up operations in the new city. Even when AA closed up BNA, RDU, and SJC (the first time) they didn't just halt operations overnight. Instead it happened over a couple year period. At the same time MIA was being built up. The HP situation at CMH is different, that was barely a hub, if you even wanted to call it that. It was nowhere even close to the magitude of an ORD, DEN, or SLC. Any other airline would call it a focus city.

Right now there is too much capacity in the industry. Its been said that the loss of any one (or even two) hubs would not create a "gaping hole" in the US airline system. The hub city would obviously lose numerous city pairs and flights, but the O&D traffic would have more than enough opportunites to travel to other airline's hubs or on some point-to-point routes. Airlines would operate larger equipment and you might see a few new routes, but the hub would not be necessary right away.

Everyone has been calling for UA's death, well they were all calling for US to fall too....it hasn't.......nor who is to think that UA will or will not. Same goes for the fate of AA.

The only facts are:
1) HP is closing its hub at CMH (not even noticable in the big picture of things)
2) CO has given a warning to CLE
3) US has given a warning to PIT

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Just Used The Dual-Exit Gate At DEN; Saw DL Emerg. posted Thu Oct 12 2006 16:47:32 by DIA
American Airlines Stuck In The Snow At DEN posted Wed Dec 20 2006 21:48:33 by Graphic
F9 Ramper Run Over By Plane At DEN posted Mon Dec 4 2006 01:05:30 by Aviacentre
What Would DL & US Look Like..... posted Thu Nov 16 2006 19:02:50 by MEACEDAR
DL Sales Staff At Disney World posted Thu Nov 16 2006 08:03:56 by GFA330
Connecting From DL To NW At MSP posted Mon Nov 6 2006 07:31:41 by Copaair737
AA 777 At DEN On 21 October posted Fri Nov 3 2006 06:39:06 by Longhornmaniac
DL Landing Incident At Denver Int'l Airport posted Thu Oct 12 2006 02:50:17 by Brick
Would Have BA Stayed At SAN With A 747SP? posted Mon Aug 21 2006 04:43:18 by Hockey55dude
Would DL Have Been Better Keeping Their MD-11s posted Sun Jul 16 2006 15:50:23 by RobertS975