Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Flybe Poised For DH4 Order  
User currently offlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1406 posts, RR: 3
Posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2914 times:

Flybe British European is in the final stages of closing a deal with Bombardier Aerospace to trade in its entire DH1/DH3/CR1 fleets for newer, larger DH4 variants. The number of aircraft in the deal (which includes the replacement of 2 146-100s) is to be 17 new DH8-400s.

This will help simplify the Flybe. fleet to two types, the Q400 and the BAe146.

regards

Mike

19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2871 times:

Knowing Jersey...errrr.....British....errrrr.....FlyBe, 2 weeks down the line they'll decide that the CRJ is actually their aircraft of choice, and get rid of all the Dash 8s and 146s.

User currently offlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1406 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2822 times:

i appreciate the humour, but this one is set in stone.

I have to say that whilst the company has made mistakes in the past, they are'nt proud in admitting they're wrong and seem to be heading in the right direction.

regards

Mike


User currently offline777236ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2804 times:

It's not just a case of admitting they're wrong, FlyBE has to be the most disorganised airline in the UK right now.

User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12428 posts, RR: 37
Reply 4, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2780 times:

Also disorganised as far as its identity is concerned; what is it trying to be? Low cost or a hybrid. The latter has been a minefield for other airlines. As good an aircraft (when it works) as the 8-400 is, I hardly think it's ideal for low cost operations.

Surely they could acquire something more appropriate for a real operation: A319s or 73Gs, for example. Although considerably larger than the 146s, at the rate aircraft prices are going, there must be good deals available, especially if a larger operator were to go under, releasing many A319s onto the market . . .


User currently onlineThomas_Jaeger From Switzerland, joined Apr 2002, 2382 posts, RR: 28
Reply 5, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2769 times:

I think that the regional low-cost concept of Flybe. can work out fine. You have to take into account that offering flexible types of fares especially targeting business travellers Flybe. is able to get a higher yield than other low-cost airlines. Together with the lower operating costs of an aircraft like the Dash 8-400 I am convinced that they can be successful, they of course also need high load-factors above 70% I'd say to be profitable. However, I think it's the only way to survive for regional carriers to offer flights in niche market with a combined low-cost/business model offering cheap fares to leisure travellers and more expensive fares still cheaper than C Class or Y Class full fares at traditional airlines for business travellers who need flexibility.


Swiss aviation news junkie living all over the place
User currently offlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1406 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2708 times:

THANKYOU!

The Q400 has lower operating costs than the Airbus and Boeing series and the reliability of the Q400 is in the high nineties at the moment!

The company may have been a bit disorganised in recent years but to be quite honest i think the flexibility shown since 9/11 has been exemplary.

And to say the company will fail is ridiculous, we are on course for profit this year DUE to the changes we have made and our Southampton-Geneva as just one example is running at a 82% load factor in the first month of operations alone!

The 737/32s series are TOO BIG for flybe, and in any case, BE could not operate either type on their AF routes anyway! I WISH flybe would order the 717 to replace the 146s, it would be ideal for low fares operations and wouldnt present any operational problems where AF are concerned.

regards

Mike


User currently offlineAirX From United Kingdom, joined May 2002, 105 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2651 times:

What will happen to some of the lower capacity routes with the DH1/DH3s? Likely to be discontinued or to have lower frequencies? To be honest I am quite fond of the DH4 so it is welcome news.

Regards Adrian.


User currently offlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1406 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2589 times:

Flybe is currently reviewing its poorest performing routes, but it is not in any rush to cancel any existing routes as the Q400 has the same operating costs as the Q200  Smile

The ones i've heard to be under considerable review are Belfast City-Bristol and the Exeter routes.

regards

Mike


User currently offlineTeahan From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 5293 posts, RR: 61
Reply 9, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2569 times:

HUYfan,

Just wondering what your source is re the Q400 being cheaper to operate per seat compared to the B737NG/A32S family? It would seem quite a feat for a much a smaller aircraft.

Jeremiah



Goodbye SR-LX MD-11 / 6th of March 1991 to the 31st of October 2004
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29792 posts, RR: 58
Reply 10, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 2525 times:

Correct me if I am wrong but isn't a Dh1 a Chipmunk and a DH3 an Otter.

It so, going to a Dash-8-400 is a big jump.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © John Olafson
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Neville Murphy




OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineAvroArrow From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 1045 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 2524 times:

Hehe, yes L-188 I think you are right, although I'd happily fly on a Chipmunk or an Otter. I think you can attribute the DH1 and DH3 in this thread to lazy typing for Dash8-100 and Dash8-300.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


Give me a mile of road and I can take you a mile. Give me a mile of runway and I can show you the world.
User currently offlineT prop From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 1028 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2506 times:

"We look for the best seat-mile cost for the two aircraft types we operate- a 75 seat turboprop and a 110- seat jet. And for the turboprop requirement. the Q400- and I don't think anyone will deny this- has BY FAR the lowest seat cost. So for our operations, the turboprop is absolutely critical."

-Jim French
Managing Director FlyBE.

Regional Airline World Jan/Feb 2003.
----------------------------------------
Sounds like he likes it.

T prop.


User currently offlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1406 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2459 times:

He IS very keen on the aircraft and personally i love it too  Smile

For flybe's markets, the Q400 is cheaper. It can fill a 78 seat Q400 on SOU-BGY for example, but a 737-700 for example would go half full, so relative to flybe., the Q400 is best. And i much prefer the 2-2 layout of the Q400.

regards

Mike


User currently offlineBestWestern From Hong Kong, joined Sep 2000, 7114 posts, RR: 57
Reply 14, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 2444 times:

Me thinks that FlyBe should move to a 100% Q400 fleet, including switching the AF operations. Have the JY LHR operations suffered of late... The morning TLS rotation was dropped, and fares to LYS have fallen dramatically.

Its time for Mr french to be ruthless to save the company. If routes dont work on a Q-400 they should be dropped, as should any marginal base operation.



The world is really getting smaller these days
User currently offlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1406 posts, RR: 3
Reply 15, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2356 times:

Air france refuse to allow us to use prop equipment on the CDG routes. they are also too small in capacity for these routes.

BE/AF LHR routes never seem to be full apart from at weekends, but the fares charged are quite high so the yields are'nt too bad.

regards

Mike


User currently offlineAvt007 From Canada, joined Jul 2000, 2132 posts, RR: 5
Reply 16, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2342 times:

I'd be surprised if the 400 has the same operating costs as a 200. The engines are twice the size, although it will carry twice the pax. If you have 37 pax in a 200, and 37 in a 400, which one is making money?

User currently offlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1406 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2295 times:

It is difficult to say whether EITHER is making money, there are too many variables such as sector length, ticket price etc.

If a Q200 left BHD for BRS with 37 pax and a Q400 did the same with 37 pax, there would be very little difference in costs. I suppose you could look at it in the same way that older 757-200s cost more to operate than 757-300s  Smile

Regards

Mike


User currently offlineAvt007 From Canada, joined Jul 2000, 2132 posts, RR: 5
Reply 18, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2291 times:

What I am saying is, are the direct operating costs per hour the same? Or, on the same leg, given the higher speed of the 400, how do they compare? I know that at CRA, the operating costs for the 100 and 300 were very close, with the 300 slightly higher, but not much.

User currently offlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1406 posts, RR: 3
Reply 19, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2306 times:

The Q4 incorprates many tchnological and cost saving advances over its older siblings.

In flybe's case fleet commonality would make the Q4 cheaper overall.

regards

mike


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
FI: NW Poised For Big E175 Order. posted Wed Sep 20 2006 02:13:12 by Remcor
Flybe Expansion For Summer 2007 posted Sat Nov 25 2006 01:11:16 by SQNo1
DH4 Order From Tassili Airlines posted Tue Aug 1 2006 08:44:06 by PRGLY
QF Offered Greater London Access For Airbus Order posted Mon Mar 27 2006 05:01:08 by Atmx2000
WSJ: SQ Likely To Tap Boeing For New Order-Sources posted Fri Dec 23 2005 05:22:14 by N328KF
RR Poised For A350 Breakthrough posted Wed Jun 22 2005 00:19:23 by YUL332LX
PAL Poised For Narrowbody Choice posted Fri Dec 10 2004 22:16:47 by FCKC
SIA & Boeing In Final Talks For 7E7 For Aug Order posted Sat Jul 3 2004 10:01:35 by Singapore_Air
Virgin Atlantic Looks To 777s, A340s For £1B Order posted Tue Oct 28 2003 09:31:55 by Singapore_Air
KLM Selects GE Engines For Widebody Order posted Wed Jun 26 2002 09:35:41 by Skippy777